"The Native Canadian and Friends", Needs a Hand..

Rideau Canal Museum and Wood Mill at night, Smith Falls, Ontario..

With the ever increasing amount of people wanting to be counted and be involved in fighting the good fight against the feminasties, their lying ways and total dishonesty, we have another new brother in arms, who is patiently going where some fear to tread..

Over the years we have witnessed the procedures that feminists follow and the methodology they use to spread their poison. It would appear that no one is safe from that, not even smaller cities and towns, all which are open slather. Any place regardless of size will eventually bare the brunt of those messengers of hate and evil. If we can reduce their hate message and interference, then we have at least achieved something and it does all help..

Here is one such site and it relates to Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada. Not that far from the border of the US.

I would like you to have a look at his site, support it by becoming a follower or leave a comment and lets see if we can help him fight the scourge that he has been fighting as well as we all have, for years..

I have been under attack by the local radicals for a while, the more join the more i can scare them.

More information..

EMC Smiths falls, objectivity out the door, promoters of feminist untruths, radicalism and parental alienation.

This is a local post, for Lanark county and Smiths falls Ontario. In response to the Smiths falls EMC's refusal to publish the truth.
I have daughters and a grand daughter, by no means is this about women, it is about the destructive ideals of radical feminism and their effort to destroy the family.
-The family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process." -- Linda Gordon
-We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." Robin Morgan
-Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
-Every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin

What families experience at the hand of the local woman's shelter and social programs under it's anti parent directors and the staff in the Lanark county area, is destroying the very fabric of family life, therefore the nation itself. I believe that exposing the untruth been spewed out by these people need to be told. I will not go after all shelters because it would not be right, this blog supports the original ideas of the woman's shelter promoted by Erin Pizzey.(Pizzey said that militant feminists hijacked her cause and used it to try to demonise all men, not only in Britain, but internationally).
I can only speak about local experiences and provide undeniable proof that the propaganda been imposed on the local population is nothing other than a response to this blog.
After been told that this blog is been closely scrutinized by the shelters directors, "some" of her supporters in the police, I am glad they read it and do not like what is been written. And nothing makes me happier. The truth hurts.

The local paper the Emc smiths falls, has been a propaganda tool for the local radical left wing feminist for a long time, refusing to publish local horror stories coming out of the social programs. The shelter, the local school, (St John in Perth), with Ontario works, open doors, connections, family services and all others have been increasing their funding by going after teens, specifically teen girls. We have a saying in Smiths falls, "in the spring go downtown and see how many children are pushing strollers". Welfare on demand seems to be the local governments idea of economic recovery, in turn, teen drug abuse, crime, are a big problem and downtown businesses are becoming an extinct thing of the past. There was a study performed by local officials about this problem and when parents tried to get involved they were turned away, so much for their study. Those responsible for the problem, are in charge of studying the problem, makes sense doesn't it?

How Men can Decode "Women's" Menstrual Cycle..

 Pick the blond clones..

This information is what feminist have been trying to hide, delete and deny for many a decade. They are of the opinion that the menstrual cycle is irrelevant and superfluous to their cause and one can understand why when one looks at the studies on how women are affected by it.

In the worst case scenarios, their behaviour are effected to such a degree as to make them totally dysfunctional and even bedridden for the period(intended) of the cycle. The other side of the argument is ofcourse that it is swept under the carpet and not discussed or taken seriously..

Just some added benefits from feminism, as they live in ignorant, self induced silence..

How men can decode women’s menstrual cycles

Men can actually tell from a woman's voice when she is having her period, a new study has claimed.

For the study, conducted by Nathan Pipitone at Adams State College and Gordon Gallup from SUNY-Albany, the researchers asked three groups of men to listen to voice recordings of ten women who counted from one to five at four different points over their menstrual cycle.


According to Popular Science, all four recordings were played in a random order and then the first group of men were asked to guess which were made while the women were on their period. The tests revealed that the men were correct 35 per cent of the time, which was described as a 'significant' result.

A study by the two scientists four years ago had already shown that men find the voices of ovulating women more attractive than voice recordings at other points in their period cycle. So to update their research, they swapped the recordings that were nearest to ovulation with those from a less fertile day. The second group in the new study still spotted the voice during menstruation 34 per cent of the time. In fact, Pipitone and Gallup said all three groups pinpointed the 'period' voices more than any other recordings.

Evidence has already shown that men subconsciously judge where a woman is in her menstrual cycle. According to the men taking part in the experiments, they could tell the women were menstruating by four key indicators in the recordings - mood, quality, pitch and speed. Some said that the menstrual recordings appeared lower in pitch, quality and mood.

In evolutionary terms, an aversion to menstruation, whether conscious or subconscious, is logical because males will seek females who are ovulating in order to pass on their genes.


"The men seemed to determine menstrual voices by picking the most unattractive voice," the Daily Mail quoted Pipitone as saying. He added that it is hormones that give the women away, by inducing vocal change. "Vocal production is closely tied to our biology. For example, cells from the larynx and vagina are very similar and show similar hormone receptors," he said. Gallup concluded that "the sound of a person's voice contains a surprising amount of reproductively relevant information." The study has been published in the journal Ethology.
Link..

Tickling the Cortex..

Comedy does come in many forms and as the saying goes "A picure is worth a thousand words" is one hundred percent spot on..

Here's proof..

Someone having fun with Photoshop..

If only..

Erm..

The Force is strong with this one..

Kids using unidentifiable new hand held devices..

Canine Comment ?..

I wonder if they stand for the same meaning..

And ofcourse we cannot escape the verbals for humour..

Craigslist: Best Super Bowl Ad..

The add below is apparently peaking on Alexa as the most popular hit at the moment. Thought I would just demonstrate how one enterprising being is going to get himself into some serious bother just to make a few bucks. This is one of the more interesting money raising ideas I have come across but definitely not the brightest..



The best Craigslist ad for Super Bowl tickets we've seen in XLVI years.

What Black Men Think: Why he Hates You..

The feminist's nightmare, the family

I have on my Google reader a site named "What Black Men Think", having been pointed in that direction quite a few years a go and keeping an interest in my coloured brothers has always been there as I have met many and have a very good personal friend as well..

The other side of the coin was the endless expose of black women, especially by Hollywood, who appear to be determined to expose them as heartless, nasty and totally obnoxious bitches, which has appeared to have worked where I am concerned. Couple that with the endless examples of their penchant to banging thugs and being the majority of single mothers (70%) and one does have to wonder what the hell is going on. It's would appear to be a problem with no possibility of change..

So meanwhile we have all black men cast as useless individuals by those exact mommas, just like all men are now derided and castigated by any and most females at will. One has to wonder who is going to wakeup first, as it is obviously not working out and also, who will actual admit to being the major culprit for creating, what is obviously becoming, a totally dysfunctional society..

Yes well, someone somewhere has to start the reversing methodology of that soceity destroying attitude and there are a lot of good guys out there trying hard..

What Black Men Think..

My inquisitive nature wondered why black men, especially the Hip-Hop crowd, started caning the piss out of the sistas a few years back, also wondered if this was just an example, indicator or expression of what they really thought about their women. Think back to when some women bandied together and tried to censure and eliminate that level of vitriol against their own sex, just because it was there and they really did not care why, or the reason it surfaced to begin with, they just wanted it stopped. The girls had their reasons of ensuring their broken pedestal was not completely shattered and destroyed. So they worked at changing the wording of those songs, via threat, denigration and hubris, and it would appear that it did to some degree, work.

But the relentless downhill slide which appears to have affected all poorer communities more, is still rampant as new generations of boys are raised by a majority of single mothers even though we know that women cannot raise a son on their own and still expect that individual to be a normal, happy, balanced human being. The odds are against that as studies clearly demonstrate, a woman is incapable of joining in the ruff and tumble of boisterous lads, as many mothers will happily attest, and also incapable of exposing him to areas that would ensure his ability to prosper, as all he ever would get is the female perspective, not good.

In normal families the mother would educate their son/s on specific areas like affection, hygiene, diet and general physical presentation (they all overlap between parents) but a Father's presence (without him speaking a word) can have a major affect on his thinking by just demonstrating how he interacts with the woman in his life(the boy's mother). Children see a lot more than they hear, learn by example more than lecturing. If that relationship is stable, loving and happy, then it sets a benchmark for his own outlook and behavioral patterns. Feminists are quite aware of this, which is why one of their goals is to destroy the family and give all rights of possession of the child to the mother..

So we have this book and you can read the first chapter on that link supplied. It is about the usual problems that most face and have to deal with but there are more problems created with the influx and expansion of single mothers that can, will and are just way too big to handle, seeing that life already brings copious challenges as it is, without the help of creating more unrequested and undeserved ones..

It is not a matter of a boy needing his dad or male company, it's a matter of having to. Males seek male company desperately, particularly when exposed to the opposite sex for a period of time. The idiosyncrasies of the female mind as well as the endless conversational levels, is just something way too hard to deal with on a constant level. It is akin to escaping a prison cell with the volume turned up and one does have to escape that, if one admits that necessity in all honesty. It is not the case of, if, it's when..

Why He Hates You..

Single mothers would serve their sons better by letting him spend more time at other boy's homes, preferably a married stable home where both parents are present as this with counter the endless single presence of a female, where male company is not only wanted but desperately required, desperately needed. Mothers can only teach boys half of what they need to know. That's a fact as studies have continually demonstrated and that goes for girls as well. They learn a lot by just watching..
The blame is ofcourse not mainly pointed to one sex but I just refuse to include the standard disclaimer as I normally view that as excusing the one or apologising, where an apology is not in most cases warranted..

WHY IS THIS THE CRITICAL ISSUE?

Dear Daddy..

82.3% is the number of African American children born since 1990 that will not live in the same home as their biological fathers before graduating High School. Today, a generation of African American youth, have not had sustained access to positive paternal or male role models. Consequently, the concept of a residential father is often too removed from these children’s reality. Many of us know the statistics; too many of us have attempted to affect the multiple social, economic and educational dilemmas facing the African American community.Through outreach media, iYAGO Entertainment Group has dedicated its works to familial reconciliation and healing.

Spare Us the 'Women's" Politics..

Please, spare us the 'women’s politics' 

The Left's vision of feminism and women's issues, treating women as a homogenous group, is ridiculous, argues Ruth Porter.

Gee, if only that was possible. We have been bombarded by that endless sickening "What women want" hysteria for so long that the majority of generations on this planet was raised up with it. They actually know of nothing else. The endless hype, screaming rhetoric and demands, that we have had over the years were purely generated by marxist feminists in order to achieve their own fantasised Utopia. The marxist version which has over the centuries never eventauated to begin with. That marxist dream consists of seeing who could murder the most amount of people within a given time limit. More people died while marxists reigned than did all the wars combined and you could probably thrown in the additional headcount from death by disease as well..

But that did not stop feminists from having another go at it nad probably with the help of the global warmist movement, they were seeking that same outcome. Strangely enough, they were actually trying to outdo each other in finding ways to disperse as much money as possible onto the least deserved..

So we have that tired old boring and in this day and age, inane bickering over feminism and that tired, well trodden or bled to death topic, "women"..

Is there no end..

Obviously not. Out they drag the narcissists to once again raise that old topic but this time with a difference, it's actually got two females debating it, for a change, gee, which basically means that they both get to argue, and thrash to death, that same old tired topic once again and keep it insanely alive..

Girls, girls, girls: it’s time we draw a line under the obsession with women and "our" issues. The level of debate over feminism reached a new low this week with the discussion between Laurie Penny and Louise Mensch on Newsnight.
The media is fascinated by this issue, either focusing on the “battleground for women’s votes” or on topics such as whether BBCRadio 4's Today programme has enough of us on. Newsnight seems to be leading the charge with its all-women panels. I suspect it’s got to a point where feminism is now being given disproportionate air time, but no one’s done a study on this yet.

Oh yes, if this had been a promotion for a product, it would have been banned because of oversell, people would have complained to the company and to the appropriate licensing department, filed about being bored to death and would never in return buy the product. The product would have been banned as tasteless and useless, for it's failure to live up to expectation and refunds would be demanded. All money spent on the product, to be returned The company would have to go into liquidation, never to rear it unworthy head again, one can dream..

There's more unfortunately..

There are many different types of feminism, some based on ideas of sexual difference, others on a focus on androgyny; there are schools of feminism in a neo-Marxist tradition that look at power relationships between people, and there are others focused on the rights agenda. Some of them must logically be wrong, as they are trying to accomplish entirely contradictory things from each other.

What was that I was saying about marxism again..

Anyway, I can't take any more of that useless blathering. If your prone to self inflicting punishment.. Here is the link..

Liz Jones: I am Such A Victim of Everything..

Oh no! Liz Jones again. We have had the misfortune of commenting about this feminist before, one who could well be classed as a male hater, as all feminists can be graded as such because of their voluntary involvement with that male hating hegemony. Feminism has clearly demonstrated that beyond doubt, demonstrated it so clearly that even a child could comprehend it but we still have the nay-sayers clinging to their fanciful notion that being a feminist automatically ensures their own interpretations are paramount and no other explanation exists. Like I said, Childish, immature, baseless thinking that needs to be thrown in the rubbish bin along with the belief that feminism is about equality..
Anyway, back to Jones. Gee, where does one begin. One would have to be able to interpret it's fantasies from reality while loaded on crack. Cognitive dissonance would not even go any where near explaining the missteps this woman has wallowed through..

Liz Jones : " I want a BABY..

Feminist Liz Jones to Suffer Another Christmas Alone, Sniff.!!

To LIZ JONES: Women Killed Chivalry, Too Hard To Learn ?

As you can see, she has raised it's narcissistic head before and it was not pretty. But once again we notice that same CD(cog. dis.) level has not evaporated at all as one would imagine to be the case as one's years increase on this planet. Nope, it appears that only some learn and some just keep flogging that same dead horse that hasn't moved for ten years..

If you have run out of tissues, as one does when reading the warped insolence of Jones, use a towel..

Why do women like me still cling to the fantasy of being swept off our feet? (... even at the age of 53!)


That could be regarded as an obvious question, it borders on reasonable, even for Jones' standards, but it follows the same irrational depth defying logic as she usually does..

A good sport, he texted me this: ‘I’ve been wondering, Liz, why you are alone. And it’s because you know most men aren’t worthy of you.’ This is true: special women hold out for longer, ever hopeful. We believe he is out there, somewhere, that one-in-a-million man, that white knight.

OMNIA VANITAS, (all is vanity). I wondered if Jones actually noticed the sarcasm or whether she actually assumed that that no one deserved of her diety, royal assent, acceptance. One only has to read a couple of her comments to see that that is precisely true. Jones is the typical feminist female who has such a high opinion of herself that she could not possibly regard anyone en par with such a brilliant, exciting, more exciting, enthralling and hallowed prize as herself. All men should, at the drop of a hat, queue at the stable door for her assessment and be prepared for the inevitable "penis comparison test", just so she can demonstrate her superior girlishness. In reality, it has the sex appeal of fellow feminastie, Maureen Dowd (same whining ages and moans about the exact same issue, no one wants a bar of em!) and the manners of a foraging Canadian Wolverine on heat. Don't believe me, than have a look at this photograph and tell me how exited you are and how you would go out of your way to avoid wish to meet it. She is epitome of the saying that "If you can't do it, teach it"..

Bloody hell, it would frighten kids as it looks like a participant in the Salem Witch Trials and survived.

Our standards are impossibly high. Endlessly disappointed, like Madonna we never made relationships a priority. We believed that success, money, power and nice things would be enough. Unfortunately, we have discovered they aren’t.

Using Madonna as an example is like getting PETA to promote a local abattoir. 


Yep, she got conned like so many other women her own age did and accepted the feminists mantra "You can have it all", erm no you can't, but went onto screwing up it's own life and where has that got her, apart from endless bitching about how hard life is and how hard it is to find a man according to some imaginary, unlimited yardstick. In reality, I think she is just a pain in the arse. I think this women is way too obnoxious in more ways than one to even be considered as a partner unless you enjoy the endless "dick" comparison activity at the end of every day, as you greet it at the door, along with it's endless demands for you to entertain her while she in return, returns nothing.  She will ofcourse ensure  bitter annoyance and endless entitlement. As all feminists have already demonstrated, to partner one could only be compared to living a life of self denial and facing the endless demands of ensuring that you did half the washing up and took your turn at any other efforts that is normally required on a daily basis for existence. Fancy having to spend endless days being rammed through the wringer on every minutiae of daily existence just because she decides it should be the case..


Nope, give that a miss, thank you very much..
I will probably have nightmares after seeing that image..

Even the Bern waxes lyrical on the topic..

Dr Greg Canning: Give Blokes a Fair GO!

Great to see all round good guy and blog follower Dr.Greg Canning, demonstrate what it takes to get the message out and spread the word. Greg states a few obvious issues that need to be stated and demonstrates also that the need for a good solid Men's Coalition in Australia is way overdue..

We have already exposed the fact that radical feminists have infiltrated the Gillard Government with her blessing, granted tax payer dollars to the tune of 2 Billion dollars to feminist interests and have already influenced legislation that is designed to limit, if not take it away all together, Men's fundamental Basic Human rights. The legislation already introduced is for any man to be automatically found guilty at the "word" of one single female, without proof or witnesses or even substantiated by professional evidence as one would have if one was assaulted or robbed.
This is a basic human rights issue as no one should be able be imprisoned, according to existing laws or held guilty without that person being able to have their day in court with a jury present, to argue their case. This has already been the case as many Men in Australia and world-wide can already testify..

So it's with great enthusiasm that I bring this great news and congratulate Greg on his great effort. Well Done. This has really made my day..

For the rest of the article..

Obama and the Birthers..

I have never been a fan of Obama as he is just too close to Marxism for me to be comfortable with. He has confirmed my fears by granting high government positions to his fellow marxists as well. That cannot not be for the good of the country, I would have thought.
Marxism is directly opposed to the capital market system which works that well that the communists dictators in China even promoted it, but are now in the process to winding it back if they can. Watch for some interesting activity in China in 2012..

This post may indeed come close to being a "conspiracy theorist dream" which I resist and definitely do not promote. Too many about about already. But I have been following the Obama "Birthers"(started by Hillary Clinton) arguments about Obama right to office if he is not an actual US citizen and I have found the MSM avoiding any mention of it or just presenting some indifferent commentary on such an important topic.

So for the sake of argument, have a peak at the case in Georgia this week, where the Judge failed to fined against the defendant Barack Hussein Obama, and here is a running commentary on the case which I found rather interesting to say the least. It is third party assessment and commentary, so it can be taken with a pinch of salt. But interesting just the same..

Thursday, January 26, 2012

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW


By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am



Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.


The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.


Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.



After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.




Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.



Game on.

5 minutes.

10 minutes.

15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

20 minutes.

It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.

 Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? 

Is he directly ignoring the courts subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?

Certainly not.

Court is called to order.


Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.


Obama’s fathers place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.



Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.



Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s fathers status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs. Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs. Happersett opinion.



It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs. Happersett opinion.



The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.



Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.



Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.



2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.



Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.



Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.



RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.



DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.



Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.



Dreams From My Father entered.



Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.



Discovery received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This discovery contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.



This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.



At this point, the judge takes a recess.



The judge returns.



David Farrar takes the stand.



Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indonesian. Deemed not relevant by the judge.



Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.



Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.



State Licensed PI takes the stand.



She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.



Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.



Next witness takes the stand.



This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop.. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.



Linda Jordan takes the stand.



Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.



Next witness.



Mr. Gogt.



Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.



Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.



States this is a product of layering.



Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.



Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.



Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.



Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.



Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.



Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.



Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.



Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.



Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.



Taitz takes the stand herself.



Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.



Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.



Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.



And with that, the judge closes the hearing.



What can we take away from this?



Its interesting.

Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records

Women out of control..

One does have to wonder where this is all heading. we have the latest saga about a female prison psychologist faking a "I BEEN RAPED" scene in order to get her husband to move to another swankier suburb, yep a qualified, recognised, licensed professional, supposedly grown up female, resorts to acting like a child just to get her own way..

The court was told Martinez, 36, engaged the help of her friend, Nicole April Snyder, 33, to stage the bogus crime in April last year. Before dialling 911, she split her own lip, wet her pants, ripped her blouse, and had a friend punch her in the face. When police arrived, she was crying hysterically, and told officers she had found a stranger in the house who knocked her out, raped her and fled taking two laptops, an Xbox and her purse. But she was allegedly caught out when a colleague told police she had faked the entire event.

Martinez staged the entire ordeal, scraping her own knuckles with sandpaper and used a pin to cut her lip, court papers allege. She ripped open own her shirt to expose her breasts and wet herself to persuade police she had been knocked unconscious, according to the documents. Her friend allegedly used specially bought boxing gloves to bruise her friend's face.

And the Pussy Pass, the automatically assumed and expected reduced sentence that only women receive was --

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Kevin J. McCormick sentenced Laurie Ann Martinez to five years probation, six months of electronic monitoring and ordered her to pay $4,463.32 in restitution for the police investigation. On top of that comes the personal cost - her husband has divorced her, and she was fired from her job as a psychologist at California State Prison, Sacramento.

The only real justice in this case was that her husband had the sense to give this lunatic the flick..
Link..
Meanwhile..

Mother who staged phony kidnapping and later found with daughter at Disney World gets eight years in prison for stealing more than $1million

The suburban mom arrested at Disney World after calling in a hoax kidnapping of her daughter nearly three years ago was sentenced to 100 months in jail after she was convicted of stealing more than $1million from her boss and a relative.

'She's convulsing': Demi Moore 911 call reveals actress 'smoked something'... but drug details are edited out

A tape of a 911 call that was made from Demi Moore's home the night she was rushed to hospital has been released. In the recording, a panicked female caller can be heard saying: 'She smoked something. It's not marijuana, but it's similar to incense. She added that Demi was 'convulsing' and 'semi-conscious, barely.'

Poor Demi Moore facing a rather lonely existance after the split up which in my opinion always takes two to instigate and deliberately work on, in the majority of cases. Even her million dollar plastic refit did not postpone the inevitable. Toy boys will always win out in the end. The sooner those ludicrous, youth seeking, women realise that the better for their own sanity, health and wellbeing..

And what length won't they go to to achieve fame ?

'My boob implants swelled to the size of my head... then EXPLODED!'


Exploding is not just a little over the top, it's way over, as they just leaked. But that's another story..

Now someone has to pay because they stuck foreign material behind their mammary glands..
All fascinating and entertaining stuff. Just like in them girlie magazines..