31.7.09

Stripper 'raped' man at buck's night..

Now some may have a little laugh at this and imagine that it was just another event that should be put down to "just manning up"..

But, it goes to explain a lot about what women get away with being abusive..

I am amazed that this actually surfaced on the anti-male media and I am surprised it actually got some air-time..

Just demonstrates that we are having an effect and the "MSM (Main Stream Media)" can no longer ignore us and our issues..

Earlier in the case, the jury was told to keep their sympathy, emotion or bias out of their minds at the trial.
What ! are the courts finally getting male friendly ?

Stripper 'raped' man at buck's night
Yahoo!7 July 30, 2009, 10:52 am

A court's been told a stripper accused of raping a man at a buck's night told him it was "just a joke", after he complained about being violated by a sex toy.

The alleged victim told the Victorian County Court that he he urged stripper Linda Maree Naggs not to put the pink strap-on dildo into his anus and was shocked when she did.

"I was pretty upset at that stage," he said.

"I could feel something was there."

40-year-old Naggs is accused of raping the alleged victim.

He told the court he scuffled with Naggs and told her to leave after the incident.

"She said it was just a joke, just a joke.

"I knew that there was something wrong down there."

The man said he went to the toilet and returned with a bloody tissue that he showed to Naggs.

He said when he asked for his money back, the stripper threatened to call in bikies.

Earlier in the case, the jury was told to keep their sympathy, emotion or bias out of their minds at the trial.

Linda Maree Naggs has pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Naggs' barrister has suggested the man placed himself in close proximity to the dildo for a reason.

The man allegedly asked Naggs not go near his anus with the dildo, and she reportedly said she wouldn't.

The court's heard the man then complained to police later that day while a medical examination showed a small abrasion below is anal verge.

Medical examiners believe the abrasion was "most likely caused by blunt trauma."

Fairfax reports Naggs is a working mother and a professional dancer of 13 years.

Link..

Why did the MET Office get it wrong..

The Wet Office! Weathermen get it wrong in one in four of their forecasts

By Fiona Macrae

31st July 2009


Glorious Goodwood

Not so glorious: A race fan at the Glorious Goodwood Festival in Essex dashes through yesterday's torrential rain

It is already under a cloud for getting its seasonal forecast very, very wrong.

Now it appears the Met Office can't even be trusted on the weather a few days ahead.

A Daily Mail investigation found that its weathermen get the three-day forecast wrong more than one day in four, with the Manchester weather being the most problematic.

Our researchers focused on the three-day forecast, noting its predictions for five parts of the country - and checking on the day whether they were right.

For example, on a Wednesday, the Met Office's predictions for the coming Saturday were recorded. Then on the Saturday, they were compared with the actual weather.

The survey was carried out over a month earlier this summer in London, Newcastle, Manchester, Birmingham and Bristol.

Forty of the 153 forecasts recorded were wrong - slightly more than one in four.

In some cases, much-longed for sunny days turned into washouts, in others predicted cloud and rain never materialised.

Least reliable were the Manchester forecasts, where 13 out of 32, or 40 per cent, were wrong. London weather also proved difficult, with 31 per cent of forecasts inaccurate.

The forecasters had more luck with Birmingham and Bristol, making mistakes just 20 per cent of the time. Top of the pile was Newcastle, where just 17 per cent - or one in six forecasts - proved bad.

In one of the more disappointing mistakes, the light rain showers forecast for Birmingham turned into torrential downpours.

Less than 50 miles away, near Ashbourne in Derbyshire, a 'mini-tornado' struck a music festival, wrecking the stage and sending portable toilets spiralling in the air.

A forecast made three days in advance cannot be expected to be as accurate as one made the day before.

Heavy rain falls during the Glorious Goodwood Festival

Downpour: People dive for cover during torrential conditions at the Glorious Goodwood Festival

 Supporters

Taking cover: It was a frustrating day for cricket fans at Edgbaston as the wet conditions meant play could not get started until five o'clock

However, many people rely on the three-day forecast when making-their plans for the weekend and end up bitterly disappointed when rain spoils their barbecue or family outing.

Seaside resorts are so fed up with the Met Office getting it wrong that they are broadcasting their own forecasts.

Water sits on the outfield as rain delays the start of the third Ashes Test match between England and Australia at Edgbaston in Birmingham Water sits on the outfield as rain delays the start of the third Ashes Test match between England and Australia at Edgbaston in Birmingham

Unexpected: Racegoers shelter from the rain as the Met Office revises predictions of a sunny summer

Unexpected: Racegoers shelter from the rain as the Met Office revises predictions of a sunny summer

Blackpool tourism chiefs started transmitting daily weather updates on the internet earlier this month and Bournemouth is about to start using a webcam so visitors can judge the conditions for themselves.

The Dorset town claims to have lost £1million in May after the Met Office wrongly predicted bad weather for bank holiday Monday.

rain

Great British summer? This couple were caught out in the rain while punting in London

A Met Office spokesman said: 'Forecasting the weather in this country is extremely difficult - it's notoriously changeable.'

The spokesman added that its four-day forecast is now as accurate as the one-day one was 20 years ago and the forecast for the next day is right six days in seven.

As for the 'barbecue summer' that never arrived, the office yesterday admitted officially that its prediction had been hopelessly wrong.

Earlier on: BBC weather predicted rain was on the way all over the UK

Earlier on: BBC weather predicted rain was on the way all over the UK

In April, its weathermen had joyfully proclaimed the chances were 'odds-on for a barbecue summer'. The chances of summer being a washout were a measly 30 per cent, they declared.

But July saw almost a month's worth of rain falling in the first two weeks alone. And the 'revised seasonal forecast' warns the weather will remain unsettled well into August.

The Met Office, or 'Wet Office' as it has been nicknamed, defended itself by saying seasonal forecasting was still a new science.

Mac


Why indeed ? Did their "global Warming" hysteria counter for it's non-event ?

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/the-big-question-why-did-the-met-office-get-it-so-wrong-1764529.html

Grumpy Old Sod..


Independent..

The woman charged with ripping baby from dead mother's womb..

So what's new..

The woman charged with ripping baby from dead mother's womb



Why a third of women want to give up work to look after their children

Jill Kirby, director of the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank, said: ‘Once again a survey is telling us that the Government’s got it wrong.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1203295/Why-women-want-work-look-children.html#ixzz0MqIA1QY8


Link..


'I'll go abroad to keep my baby': Pregnant again mother of 13 vows to save new baby as sister calls for her to be sterilised.

The mother-of-three told the Daily Mirror: 'She should be sterilised. She's going to end up with 20 kids taken into care.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1203124/Pregnant-mother-13-babies-taken-care.html#ixzz0MqIYWEKz


Link..


No, I dont write this stuff..

'I've never been unfaithful to my wife' declares Peter Andre..

Did you know that today's media representatives, re: journalist, are actually fighting against the charge that they are not cheapening, distorting and lying in their positions but they suggesting that they are neither biased, sexist or have any predilection at all..

Bacon landed on my plate this morning..

For their lies, again they pay out..

I wonder which magazine printed it..?

The Australian singer accepted substantial undisclosed legal damages over a report in The People
Would that be one of those magazines favoured by the opposite sex by any chance ?

'I've never been unfaithful to my wife' declares Peter Andre after winning libel case

By Emily Sheridan
Last updated at 1:13 PM on 31st July 2009

A jubilant Peter Andre left the High Court today after winning his legal battle against a Sunday Newspaper.

The Australian singer accepted substantial undisclosed legal damages over a report in The People in May which claimed Andre had made inappropriate sexual advances to another woman while still in a relationship with his now-estranged wife Katie Price.

The newspaper, owned by the MGN Ltd group, apologised to Andre, admitting the allegations were untrue.

Peter Andre

Triumphant: A pleased Peter Andre leaves the High Court after winning a libel case in London today

As well as their apology and libel damages, MGN have also agreed to pay Andre's legal costs.

Andre had complained over an article in May - the same month he split from Price - which claimed he had made sexual advances to a Jordan lookalike named Shira Jones in the Movida nightclub last December.

Andre's solicitor Mike Brookes said his client had briefly met Jones at the venue and gave her friend permission to photograph them together.

Speaking to Mr Justice Eady, Brooke said: 'These allegations were very upsetting and offensive to Mr Andre, as they are untrue.'

Peter Andre makes a statement outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Friday, July 31, 2009

Pleased: Andre said he had never been unfaithful to his estranged wife

MGN solicitor Sarah Toolan, said: 'The defendant wishes to apologise to Mr Andre and is joining in the making of this statement in the hope that it will assist in setting the record straight.'

Katie Price and Peter Andre

Happier times: Andre with his estranged wife Katie Price

Leaving the Royal Courts of Justice this morning, Peter read a statement as he was flanked by his brother Michael and solicitor.

He said: 'This story has led to a lot of speculation about whether I was faithful to my estranged wife, which even led her to mention it on a breakfast television show last week.

'I have never been unfaithful to my wife, not with this girl or with anyone else. I'm pleased that the Sunday People have now accepted that their story was untrue and hurtful to myself.'

He added: 'When things are untrue, I have to take action. I've not only got an estranged wife, I've got kids as well.'

Andre has two children with Price; a son Junior, four, and daughter Princess Tiaamii, two.

He is also stepfather to seven-year-old Harvey, from Price's previous relationship to footballer Dwight Yorke.

Andre and Price announced they were splitting up in May after less than four years of marriage.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1203441/Ive-unfaithful-wife-declares-Peter-Andre-winning-libel-case.html#ixzz0MqCNsLJu

Celebrity fat club..

As one comedian states when approached after a show where he dared to make a comment on the "big momma" poundage..

She was a big boned girl..

She said " You are a fatist"..

" No" he said " I think you are the fatist"..

What does it take to stop shoving food in your mouth and get off their ever spreading arse so you do not end up looking like this..

A bit of self control, maybe ?

The "new" version of the new woman ?

I thing I will weight this out..

Another hamburger with fries, anyone ?

Celebrity fat club: The pictures the skinniest celebrities never want you to see

By Daily Mail Reporter
31st July 2009

Even celebrities have fat days - but they will be hoping they never have them this bad.

A series of photos have emerged of some of the skinniest and most desirable celebrities looking as if they have been let loose at a hamburger stand.

There is Jordan, looking as if she has been on the alcopops and late-night kebabs, and the normally mini Keira Knightley looking like she has been gorging on cheesey chips.

Katie Price
.Keira Knightley.

Roll up, Roll up: How Katie Price (left) and Keira Knightley might look if they piled on the pounds

Even the ever-skinny Victoria Beckham has a double chin and an enormous pair of breasts.

But for all those rubbing their hands in glee, the pictures are merely the work of a group of Photoshop whizzkids.

The pictures are part of a selection of celebrity portraits composed by readers of website Worth1000 in an online art contest.

Victoria Beckham.
Paris Hilton

Striking a pose: They are famous for their slim figures, but Victoria Beckham and Paris Hilton might not be top of the A-list if they had these waistlines

Those entering particularly picked on those famous for their miniscule waistlines, long legs and enviably flat stomachs.

Hotel heriess Paris Hitlon is pictured with a huge belly, chubby calves, a double chin and bingo wings.

Madonna is virtually unrecognisable, looking more like a beachball, and less like the sinewy figure fans are used to seeing.

But while some of the pictures take the stars from underweight to positively obese, some of the doctored pictures actually make the celebrities look healthy.

Amy Winehouse, who has had periods being painfully thin, has a double chin in her portrait, and rather a curvaceous waistline.

amy
Madonna.

Little to large: Amy Winehouse (left) and Madonna look as if they've bulked up, but it's all Photoshop wizardry


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1203305/Celebrity-fat-club-The-pictures-skinniest-celebrities-want-see.html#ixzz0Mq9SEbNX


Gotta love the effect...

What's next ? Miss Fat World ?

Feminists just hate other feminists..

Oh ! Look, a response, by a feminist harpy to the earlier blog on feminists attacking each other..

More amusement..get the popcorn out..

Note the standard feminasties response and it's inane, incomprehensible rambling..

If you can suffer it ? it's worth at least 15 seconds just so the mantra can be exposed..

You go girl..

EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND ITS CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE ON MEN..

Okay, fun time is over, back to reality..

EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND ITS CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE ON MEN

In a cracking article at the weekend and following the resignation of another director at the Equalities Commission (see previous post), David Green of think tank Civitas wrote in the Telegraph that Trevor Phillips was a victim of a campaign because he did not believe in multi-culturalism and the victim group mentality at play.

It has always been a conundrum for this site because the site is about creating an environment where men and women receive support as individuals not because of gender, though of course, each gender has unique issues to contend with. However, as we have had 30 years (at least) of an anti-male culture it was natural for a site like this to want for men the same rights and treatment as women. We do not want more, or special treatment, we want the same treatment. What David Green's article shows how easily it is for representatives of one group or t'other to falls into the trap of wanting more, that is, positive action. We have to be careful.

Putting those musing aside, what is happening at the Commission and what is revealed by those who are leaving, is the absence of a voice for men. The battles for gender equality ignores 50% of the population as this can be played out by the ignorance of the Commission on a number of areas especially boys' education, domestic violence, male cancers, the family courts (the list could go on).

In a previous example, If you compare the elbow grease put in by the Commission on issues such as the gender pay gap and the map of gaps with their silence on those issues where men need help, it is frightening.

As mentioned in the previous post, Phillips and others have tentatively commented (on black and white boys' education and parental leave) on male subjects but there has been a backlash, obviously internally.

These are the barriers we men face, the inner sanctum of the Commission is anti-male, let no one forget this. Not one of the Commissioners (see Annual Report page 19), whether still there or not, represented a male perspective at all.


Shamelessly ratted from here..

The Rights Of Men..
I have his link on the right..

A Water-Powered Jetpack

Some light refreshment time and having a look at what the lads are doing around the world..

A water powered jetpack !!

Hmmm..

Not normally a great supporter of Popular Science ever since they went politically correct but do like to have the occasional sticky..

A Water-Powered Jetpack


The Jetlev-Flyer propels itself using a torrent of water

Up, Up and Away: Controlled with a throttle on the handgrip, Raymond Li’s Jetlev-Flyer (shown here operated by Steven J. Grey, one of Li’s official demonstrators) can provide up to two hours of continuous flight. Courtesy D.G. Hubbard

When Raymond Li decided to build a jetpack propelled by water instead of rocket fuel, most of his friends thought he had gone crazy. Worse, engineers told him it would be impossible to manage the water’s mass and thrust to keep it stable in the air.

Over the Sea: The boat is towed about five feet behind, making it easy for the operator to keep it clear of obstacles in the water. Courtesy D.G. Hubbard
Li, however, figured that if he attached a hose to his pack, and put the engine and water pump in a separate vessel that dragged behind him, he could seriously reduce his weight, and therefore the amount of thrust needed to stay aloft. In theory, a stiff hose filled with heavy, pressurized water would also add drag to stabilize the jetpack for better forward flight control.

It took four prototypes and more than 200 flight tests to get it right. But now, with a mere 30-pound pack, the Jetlev-Flyer is almost ready for production, generating 430 pounds of thrust and letting Li fly forward at 22 mph up to three stories high. His next unit will get up to 35 mph. Want one? Late this year, the craft will go on sale—just be ready to dish out close to 130 grand.

Modelling a Jetlev-Flyer: Courtesy D.G. Hubbard

How the Jetlev-Flyer Works


Li built the backrest out of fiberglass, glued a thick layer of rubber foam to the front so it wouldn’t sink when he takes off and lands, and attached a four-point racecar-style harness to lock himself in. He also added a crotch belt, a unicycle-like seat and an acrobat’s trapeze for a footrest; all help to keep the operator in optimal flying position.

POWER
Li custom-built the first boat unit out of plywood and fiberglass, but his latest prototype is an extensively modified Jet-Ski with a 215-horsepower engine, which powers an onboard pump attached to it by a direct-drive shaft. The pump connects to a 33-foot-long, four-inch-diameter polyester-and-rubber hose. The production craft, a smaller and lighter pod, will come with a 260hp engine.

THRUST
The Y-shaped assembly on the back, as well as the jet nozzles and the handlebars that steer them, are custom-fabricated aluminum tubes. Li attached the assembly to the harness above the body’s center of gravity so that, in flight, the operator is suspended beneath it. He takes off from the water, hits a trigger on the handgrip to start the pump on the pod behind him, turns the throttle, and two streams of high-velocity water of up to 60 psi lift him as high as 30 feet in the air. To go forward, he pushes down slightly on the handlebars, angling the nozzles to a maximum of 45 degrees.

Get Vertical: To stop the Jetlev-Flyer, the operator just eases off the throttle and lowers into the water. Courtesy D.G. Hubbard




While we're on jets, have a gawk at this..

Why Are Reebok's EasyTone Sneakers For Ladies Only?..

So !!!

Why Are Reebok's EasyTone Sneakers For Ladies Only?

Oh the injustice!

EasyTone by Reebok (In Cucumber) Reebok

Who doesn’t want firm buttocks and rock hard thighs? That’s the question men everywhere should be asking Reebok after they became the first major shoe manufacturer to bring out their own leg-toning walking shoe, marketed, just like similar shoes before it, only to the ladies. You know the footwear in question--the shoes with the lopsided soles, which force wearers to work a bit harder to walk, toning all the while.

While men should thank Reebok for helping to further tone the gams of the fairer sex, shouldn't we demand equal access in pursuit of a tighter tush?

The EasyTone ($100), which launched worldwide this month, has two pods with air pockets centered on the heel and forefoot. The pods are designed to look and behave like the balance balls at gyms (used by both men and women) across the country that intentionally keep the wearer off-balance. The instability requires an increase in muscle activity. As the (female) wearer shifts weight from the heel to the toe, the pods transfer air back and forth. Reebok leveraged its internal expertise with air transfer from their decades of Pump designs in developing the shoe.

The idea of intentional instability isn’t new to the footwear industry, but with Reebok, the technology is finding its way into the mainstream for hte first time. MBT footwear (available for both sexes) has been around for several years with its easily recognizable curved sole that seemingly turns your foot into a rocking chair. Reebok concedes that the EasyTone is pursuing the same ultimate benefit but is quick to point out distinctions. First and foremost, MBT shoes look different. They market themselves as the anti-shoe and those wearing a pair should get used to the attention. The EasyTone look like any other shoe once on the foot. The Reebok shoe also has two pods, one in the heel and forefoot, while MBT is designed around one larger pod.

Says Head of Womens at Reebok, Katrin Ley, “We believe every woman has the right to a nice butt but for busy women, trying to fit this into their hectic lives is not an option. Reebok EasyTone allows them to tone as they go about their everyday business. The combination of the balance pod technology and great styling means it’s a shoe they are not ashamed to be seen wearing either.”

But what about the buttocks of men, Reebok? What about the buttocks of men?

“When you talk about toning from the gluts on down, that seems to talk directly to women,” said Bill McInnis, the head of Reebok’s Advanced Innovation Division. “Guys aren’t spending a lot of time thinking about how their legs are toned up.”

As much as I'd love to just let Reebok dictate how I choose to live my life, I wanted to go against the wishes of Bill and Katrin and try some EasyTones for myself. But despite my willingness to ignore color palettes for the sake of science, Reebok doesn’t even offer an EasyTone in a women’s equivalent to a men’s size 12.

Determined, however, to conduct an objective and unbiased evaluation, I turned to the closest test subject I could find – my wife. The subject immediately noticed a distinct instability after putting the shoes on. While walking forward, a slight wobble of the foot could even be seen by an observer standing behind. That said, after a few days of wearing the shoe, she couldn’t discern muscle fatigue or soreness suggesting a significant increase in muscle activation.

As is often her wont, the subject next broke the rules for suggested usage deciding to jog in the footwear. Unlike the walking evaluation, the subject felt an immediate difference commenting that it was “just a lot harder to run,” with clear muscular soreness in the calves, thighs and buttock. She added that it felt like she “did lunges and squats during the jog”. McInnis emphasizes that the shoe is being sold as a walking shoe and that the components are tuned for walking but admits that a running version could be close behind (thought we’d fear, given the market research, still ahead of a men’s version).

And as for that men's shoe, Reebok won’t offer a peep in terms of any expected timeline for its gender-politics-defying debut. So, in the meantime, we’re endorsing a protest where men everywhere stop walking in their Reeboks altogether, pausing to appreciate the fruits of EasyTone's labor while sitting on a park bench and enjoying the view.

Don't write off organic food..

One does not like to be ignorant, so here is the defense for organic foods and don't forget that not only is it personal choice but it does support a billion dollars worth of business around the world..

You decide..



Don't write off organic food
The Food Standards Agency’s report completely failed to address the long-term effects of farming chemicals on human health, writes Molly Conisbee.


By Molly Conisbee
Published: 3:11PM BST 30 Jul 2009

Sweet, crunchy, nutritious...and covered in chemicals

Did you know that the average industrially-produced apple may have been sprayed up to 16 times with 30 different chemicals? Or that exposure to pesticides has been linked to birth defects, male infertility and nervous system disorders? Well, the Food Standards Agency’s report on organic farming would leave you none the wiser. It completely failed to address the long-term effects of farming chemicals on human health.

The study, which concentrated on the nutritional content of organic food compared to non-organic food, claimed there was little difference between the two. But with closer reading the researchers do report in their analysis that there are higher levels of beneficial nutrients, such as falvonoids and beta carotene, in organic compared to non-organic foods. But the FSA don’t consider these differences to be “important”.

The study concluded that there was no need for people to buy organic food for health benefits, but people don’t only buy organic food because they think it will make them healthier. The EU’s Quality Low Input Food project has found that regular buyers of organic food have a much more sophisticated understanding of the range of benefits that organic farming and food deliver, which stretch well beyond the nutritional.

The environmental advantages are self-evident: organic farms have on average 30 per cent more species and 50 per cent more overall numbers of wildlife such as birds, butterflies and bees. Compassion in World Farming, the recognized experts on animal welfare, says organic farming has the potential for the highest animal welfare standards. Artificial nitrogen fertilizer is banned in organic farming, so there are fewer run-offs of nutrients that cause the algae blooms in coastal waters which can have severe impacts on wildlife. There is also less dangerous waste on organic farms than on non-organic farms.

Our future will be dominated by climate change. Here organic farming is leading the way, by using solar powered fertility through crops like red clover that fix nitrogen into the soil for subsequent crops. For our own health and the health of the planet, organic food and farming will play a big part in a sustainable food and farming future.

Molly Conisbee is Director of Campaigns and Communications at the Soil Association.

Domestic Violence: The feminist Version..

Some real facts regarding DV without the misandric feminist wash cycle..

30.7.09

Male distant vision better, woman close-up, UK study finds..

Now this cannot be correct as feminists have always stated that we are the product of our upbringing, our environment and not of our sex..

Yea, I know, they were lying again..

By the way, the reason you cannot find anything in the kitchen, it's because she has filed it under her own method..

Erm! "Why are the plates on the bottom shelf as we use them every day"
Response "Because"..

Male distant vision better, woman close-up, UK study finds

Article from: Herald Sun

July 31, 2009 12:00am

IF your husband accuses you of missing the bigger picture or your wife says you have no eye for detail, there may be more than an element of truth to it.

Scientists have shown men are better at processing distant targets, while women are good at focusing nearer.

The finding reflects the way men and women's brains evolved thousands of years ago. Hunters, traditionally the men, needed to sight targets from afar.

Women, on the other hand, had to be adept at searching the area immediately within reach for fruits, nuts, berries and edible roots.

Researchers asked 48 men and women to mark the midpoint of lines on a piece of paper with a laser pointer.

Men were more accurate than women when the target was placed at a distance of 100cm -- or out of reach.

When the paper was only 50cm away -- within hand's reach -- the women were more accurate.

Psychologist Helen Stancey, from Hammersmith and West London College, said evidence already exists that separate pathways in the brain process visual information from near and far space.

"Our results suggest that the near pathway is favoured in women and the far pathway is favoured in men," she said.

The findings are published online today in the British Journal of Psychology.

In a second study, volunteers were asked to carry out the same tasks using a stick.

This time women were significantly better than men at judging both distances.

Ofsted report reveals data on very young children excluded from school..

Ermmm!!!!

Where's Dad ???


Ofsted report reveals data on very young children excluded from school

Child excluded from school

(Richard Pohle)

Daniel was excluded from school for four days. His mother fears the social implications

Very young children are being excluded from primary school because of their aggressive and sexual behaviour, an Ofsted report says.

The schools receive inadequate support from local authorities in some cases, or cannot afford the alternative strategies that help troubled young children to cope with school.

Some have repeatedly removed children under the age of 7, for fixed periods or permanently, although the total numbers of exclusions are still low for this age group. Reasons for exclusion included biting, chair-throwing and inappropriate sexual behaviour.

Earlier this month The Times exposed the extent to which children as young as 4 were being excluded, after a survey of local authorities.

The Ofsted report, published today, paints a picture of some schools struggling to cope with the disturbed behaviour of children from complex backgrounds.

Some of the children had been exposed to domestic violence, sexual abuse, poverty or a parent’s illness. One boy had seen his mother killed in a refugee camp.

The report criticises the Government for not collecting enough data on exclusions. This has resulted in an “incomplete picture” of what has been happening to children aged 7 and under, it says.

Primary schools did not always receive adequate support from the local authority, in addressing children’s mental health needs or getting specialist support for overtly sexual behaviour.

Early intervention, and strategies such as “nurture groups” (small supportive groups) were highly effective, but schools often could not afford to put these in place. Those that managed to reduce the number of exclusions had all taken a strong line on low-level disruptive behaviour. Two groups of infant and primary schools were selected for the survey: one where the number of exclusions was high and one that did not exclude children.

The report said: “What determined a school’s rate of exclusion was not its social context but the combination of its philosophy, capacity to meet challenges and, sometimes, the response received from its local authority and outside agencies when they were asked to help.”

It added: “Instability in terms of leadership and staffing was a factor

in five of the schools that had had relatively high levels of exclusions. Relationships with parents were pivotal in preventing or reducing exclusions.”

Christine Gilbert, the chief inspector at Ofsted, said: “Ofsted inspectors found that almost all children in the schools they visited knew how to behave properly. Only a small number of children found this difficult but, with proper guidance and support, the need to exclude them can be avoided.

“As our evidence shows, many schools are skilled at promoting positive behaviour and attitudes in all young children, and giving them a good start to their education. It is important that others can learn from this best practice.”

Case study

When Daniel Atkins was excluded from his primary school, he didn’t throw a tantrum. Instead he went home, curled up and slept for the rest of the day. “I always know when he’s upset because he goes to sleep,” his mother Hannah said. “But for a four-year-old to sleep like that. He must have been really upset.” In the end, he spent four days out of mainstream education.

Daniel loves reading, watching Madagascar and hedging his bets by supporting both Arsenal and Manchester United. His exclusion resulted from an incident in an after-school club, a complaint by Hannah and a mix-up over paperwork.

The school asked her to keep him at home, but she brought him in regardless, saying she was worried about her legal responsibilities for his education.

Hannah worries about the other excluded children that she sees on the streets during the day. “I think exclusion is wrong,” she said. “Keeping children in the education system is a lot more productive than taking them out.”

Women's Shelters: Havens for Abuse..

Cover-up: No Cause for Worry at Florida Abuse Shelters

The nation’s abuse shelters are bedeviled by an epidemic of violence, illicit drug use, shoddy financial procedures, ill-trained staff, and more. Last year I wrote a series of columns detailing widespread child abuse, misuse of public monies, and lack of public accountability at Florida domestic violence shelters. Recently the Florida Department of Children and Families released the results of two investigations that confirmed my earlier reports.

One such shelter is Harbor House, located in Orlando. Before delving into the findings of the probe, I’ll excerpt the message I received last year from a distraught Caucasian woman whom I’ll call Mrs. R:

“I went to a shelter in Orlando, Fl. Orange County called Harbor House back in 1990…There were women there who were there to get welfare benefits only. One woman stole quite a bit of cash from me.”

One day Mrs. R noticed the husband of a shelter resident cruising the street in front of the facility. She then recounted the following:

“I told her [the man’s wife] we have to go in and alert the others for lock down. Next thing I know, all of the black residents were plotting against me…They accused me of being a snitch….None of the counselors were on premises at night. After she [the wife] was moved away, one very big woman threatened to kill me.”

Not surprisingly, Mrs. R fled the shelter and returned to her abusive relationship.

So how is Harbor House faring these days? Not much better, according to the recent Inspector General report.

One afternoon a two-year-old boy in the shelter was left without adult supervision. During that time the child reportedly jumped off a counter, injuring his head. By law, a staff member is required to immediately report the incident to the Florida Abuse Hotline.

But when the staffer told her supervisor she planned to file a report, she was summoned to the office of director Carol Wick, who instructed the worker that Ms. Wick was the CEO and “the only person allowed to call the Hotline.” Fearing for her job, the employee remained silent about the incident.

The IG Investigation 2008-0106 dated July 14, 2009 somberly concludes, “Chief Executive Officer Carol Wick failed to make a mandatory child abuse report to the Florida Abuse Hotline and prohibited a staff member from making a mandatory child abuse report.”

The second IG report probed a shelter known as Another Way, located in the sleepy northern Florida town of Lake City. A year ago I published an exposé documenting so many tribulations at this facility that its motto should read, “Another Way: Any Way but Our Way.” www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/080728 .

Of grave concern, I reported a sexual assault that had taken place on shelter premises:

“On June 5, 2008, a four-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by a nine-year-old female at the shelter while the two were left unattended… The incident took place around 9:30 on Saturday evening. But the assault wasn’t reported to the police until noon the following day.” www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/080722

Thanks the courageous efforts of a (now former) shelter employee, a complaint was lodged with the Office of the Inspector General. Bearing an eerie resemblance to the Harbor House incident, the Another Way case also involved ill-supervised children, failure to promptly report child abuse, and attempts to dissuade others from doing so.

In this case, when the girl’s mother learned of the assault, she demanded that the incident be reported to the abuse hotline and to local police. But the shelter advocate discouraged her from this course of action, warning the mother that state investigators would come in and ruin her life, and instructed her to instead “go to bed.”

The name of the shelter employee is Gloria Taylor. Ms. Taylor had been previously convicted for a series of violent crimes, including improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon and two counts of written threats to kill or injure. These charges landed Taylor in prison for 32 months: www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/081009 .

The IG report also looked into allegations of financial misconduct, concluding Another Way managers had repeatedly squandered shelter assets. Executive director Donna Fagan had used the shelter vans for personal use and allowed long-distance phone calls from her son for non-work-related purposes.

The complete report can be seen in the IG Investigation 2008-0074 dated July 17, 2009.

In both investigations, the problem was traced to the highest management levels. In a sane world, both Carol Wick and Donna Fagan would now be out on the street looking for a job, shamed by the memory that they failed to meet their fiduciary duties to shelter residents, staff, and taxpayers.

But to this day both Wick and Fagan remain on the payroll, drawing handsome salaries of $75,000 and $95,000 respectively. In Florida, being a shelter director means never having to say you’re sorry.

Organic food has no nutritional or health benefits over ordinary food

There are a few issues that really annoy me and that is the hypocrisy, ignorance and incompetence of people who convince themselves that they are..

1. Greens
2. protecting the planet
3. Body or food conscious..

Let me explain..

I just watched a program on "Green Houses", that is, homes being "green", in relation to being self sufficient and "Earth" sensitive/friendly in it's footprint and construction..

This program went on to show-place these marvelous buildings with the intent of demonstrating that their owners were conscious of either "Global warming" or "being kind to the environment" or better still, and I like this one the most "responsible green design"..

Now I don't know about you but when I see 3 storey, 300-400 sq/mt homes with multiple lighting systems that would light up a suburb, copious rooms, heated spa baths, heated swimming pools as well as multiple Digital tellies everywhere (some use more that an electrical heater) and built predominately from timber/steel and just two people living in it, I get cynical..

It's like that same greenie stating they are here to save the planet (like they asked it) while handing out copious amount of paper, running about everywhere in their vehicles and living in log cabins while try to bring down the same companies that allowed them to do it in the first place..

I do tend to get slightly peeved..

But the article below really amuses me as we have all witnessed those smarmy individuals with those smug looks on their faces stating that they buy organic because it's healthier as nary any contaminants come within a bullfrog of it ...

Riiiiiiggggghhhtttt...


Photo
1 of 1Full Size

LONDON (Reuters) - Organic food has no nutritional or health benefits over ordinary food, according to a major study published Wednesday.

Researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine said consumers were paying higher prices for organic food because of its perceived health benefits, creating a global organic market worth an estimated $48 billion in 2007.

A systematic review of 162 scientific papers published in the scientific literature over the last 50 years, however, found there was no significant difference.

"A small number of differences in nutrient content were found to exist between organically and conventionally produced foodstuffs, but these are unlikely to be of any public health relevance," said Alan Dangour, one of the report's authors.

"Our review indicates that there is currently no evidence to support the selection of organically over conventionally produced foods on the basis of nutritional superiority."

The results of research, which was commissioned by the British government's Food Standards Agency, were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Sales of organic food have fallen in some markets, including Britain, as recession has led consumers to cut back on purchases.

The Soil Association said in April that growth in sales of organic products in Britain slowed to just 1.7 percent in 2008, well below the average annual growth rate of 26 percent over the last decade, following a plunge in demand at the end of the year.

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; editing by Simon Jessop)

Sucker foodie link..

Feminists, mauling each other..

One would be forgiven if you thought that feminists are starting to turn on their own. Simple really, each feminist has their own interpretation of itself. The standard response from those male-haters is that "I am not a feminist like that"..

Feminism has become a dirty word and one to be avoided whenever in company but there are a few that still confess to this lunacy..

In fighting is a good thing as it will eventually destroy itself as history clearly demonstrated..

Anyway, sit back and enjoy as they draw blood, screech and maul each other over semantics and feelings..

Love it..

Feminism and it's ridiculous pursuits..

In just 9.4 minutes this pocket rocket just about sums up my 2009 blog entries..

You will have to pay attention as it's full on..

Lakeport man assaulted in domestic violence incident ..

Occasionally the media gets it wrong. Stating that a women is actually involved performing an act of domestic violence is heresy..

Women are only ever, ever victims and can anyone ever say any different ?

Well, someone has, FINALLY..

Lakeport man assaulted in domestic violence incident
Written by Lake County News Reports Saturday, 18 July 2009

POTTER VALLEY – A Potter Valley woman was arrested Thursday evening after she allegedly bit her ex-husband.

The Mendocino County Sheriff's Office reported that Tammie Szupello, 31, was arrested for allegedly inflicting injury on her 34-year-old ex-husband, a Lakeport resident.

Just before 7 p.m. Thursday Mendocino County Sheriff's deputies were dispatched to 12090 Eel River Road in Potter Valley on a report of a domestic violence incident.

Deputies arrived at the Potter Valley area and contacted the victim, who reported he had been assaulted by Szupello after he arrived at her residence to drop off their children.

Prior to the victim leaving the location, he was contacted by Szupello and during a physical encounter she bit the victim on his arm, the sheriff's office reported.

The victim only received superficial injuries and medical services were not summoned.

Szupello was arrested for domestic violence and booked at the Mendocino County Jail, according to the sheriff's office.

Link..

PjTV and Alfonso on Socialism..

Marriage rates lowest since 1862..

It would appear that in my enthusiasm to promote the anti-marriage mentality, I may be actually playing into the hands of the feminist hate group doctrine..

They are determined to destroy marriage as they perceive it to control conservatism, "the patriarchy" whatever that is plus take women out of the 9-5 grind which feminists just will not stand for..

Meanwhile it appears their end goals have been reached..


Marriage rates lowest since 1862

Marriage rates in England and Wales have fallen to the lowest level since records began in 1862, the Office for National Statistics said.

Provisional marriage figures for 2006 show that 23 out of 1,000 unmarried men were choosing to marry - down from 25 men per 1,000 the previous year.

The marriage rate for women fell from 22 to 21 per thousand for the period.

The number of marriages has been in decline. In 2006 there were 237,000 - the lowest annual number since 1895.


Marriage is in danger of being lost as the core institution of society
Jill Kirby, director, the Centre for Policy Studies
Jill Kirby, from the Centre for Policy Studies, the centre-right think tank, said: "It is obviously worrying that marriage rates have reached such a low ebb but it is not surprising in view of the lack of government policy encouraging marriage over the last 10 years."

She said the existing welfare system penalises against marriage.

"Marriage is in danger of being lost as the core institution of society. Research demonstrates how important marriage is to maintain the stability for children. The break-up of cohabiting couples is much higher than married couples," she added.

Religious decline

The popularity of marriage ceremonies in approved places such as hotels and stately homes continued in 2006.

Just over 95,300 marriages took place in such premises, accounting for 40% of all marriages, up from just 5% in 1996.

But the statistics also showed that the number of civil marriage ceremonies fell 3% from 2005 - from 162,169 to 157,490.

Civil ceremonies represented 66% of all ceremonies in 2006, up from 65% in 2005. In 1990 this figure was 47%.

Religious ceremonies also declined, falling by 7% to 79,490 compared with 2005.

Since 1991 this figure has halved compared with a fall in the number of all marriages of 23% in the same period.

Religious ceremonies accounted for 34% of all marriages in 2006.


The number of church weddings has declined
A Church of England spokesman said the number of Church of England marriages have fallen against a background of increasing choice for couples as to where they can marry.

He said the Church of England has responded with a new Marriage Measure that will expand the choice of churches where each couple can enjoy their special day later this year.

"That said, there are a complex range of factors influencing the continued trend of couples delaying marriage or avoiding it altogether, not least the mistaken idea that cohabitation is a form of marriage," said the spokesman.

"Marriage affirms the goodness and rightness of love between a man and a woman, affirms this in the public sphere, beyond private arrangements, and is the best option for couples to grow together in mutual support," he said.

First marriages

The new figures show that marriages that were the first for both parties in 2006 accounted for 61% of all marriages, while remarriages for both parties accounted for 18% - both figures about the same as in 2005.

There was also very little change in the average age at marriage between 2005 and 2006.

In 2006 the mean age for all marriages increased to 36.4 years for men - up from 36.2 in 2005, and 33.7 years for women (33.5 in 2005).

In 2006 the mean age at first marriage was 31.8 years for men and 29.7 years for women.

The number of ceremonies taking place in approved premises has continued to increase.

http://anonym.to/?http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7314435.stm

29.7.09

Amfortas and Dads On The Air..

Link to Amfortas on DADS On The Air Australia..

Check out the excellent session with Amfortas on Dads On The Air..

Excellent..

Check out his MP3..

Photos..

First one..

Plastic looking at plastic..

Joan Rivers..

I thought this was kewt..




Best for last. The New Ferrari..

The new Ferrari is badged 458 Italia and has a rear-mounted V8 like the F430 it will replace
If only, just one lap...

Link to Ferrari..

Do you really want to live forever?..

Interesting article on longevity and as it affects us all..

Do I want to live forever, no. I am buggered now..

Do you really want to live forever?

There are developments that could (and probably will) lead to humans being able to live forever. But is it desirable?

man outstretching arms on beach

A naturally occurring substance found in the soil of Easter Island, in the southeastern Pacific Ocean, is the latest discovery in Man’s ongoing quest for the elixir of youth. Rapamycin may extend the life expectancy of laboratory mice but, despite the recent hype, there is no evidence that it will do the same for us. It will, however, give researchers a better understanding of why we age — a process that they hope one day to be able to slow or stop. And there is growing optimism that their work is more science fact rather than science fiction.

Ageing is not inevitable. The sea anemone is an example of a species that never appears to age, and there is tremendous variation in life expectancy among animals. Most voles won’t make their first birthday, while a giant tortoise can live to well over 150.

The average life expectancy of a British human being lies almost exactly halfway between these two extremes, with most of us alive today expected to make it well into our eighties — a figure that has risen over the past century as a result of better nutrition, living conditions and healthcare. And this increasing longevity has also been associated with better quality of life. The latest evidence suggests that people who die at 90 spend roughly the same amount of time in hospital as those who die in their seventies, and only twice as long as those who die in their mid-forties.

But to make further inroads into extending our life expectancy we need to do more than negate hazards such as disease and accidents. We need to slow the ticking of our genetic clocks.

At the moment even the best cared for human being is unlikely to make it much beyond 120 because the body’s natural repairing processes grind to a halt and whole systems start to fail.

Our tissues don’t have a pre-programmed best-before date, but their inbuilt repair processes do, and it is these that largely determine the rate at which we age. Our basic software — DNA — is particularly sensitive to damage, with an attack rate that has been estimated at 10,000 damaging hits per cell, per day. Multiply this figure by the one hundred thousand billion or so cells in the average human body and you get some idea of the challenge faced by our repair systems. Suffice to say there is a bit more to them than healing cuts and grazes.

The onslaught comes from all directions — everything from sunlight to tobacco smoke — but the main villain is oxygen. We need it to create energy, but in the same way that it turns a newspaper yellow and iron rusty, it also eats away at our structure.

Constant repair uses up a lot of energy and can weaken the processes involved, as demonstrated by what happens when our chromosomes divide during cell replication.

To prevent damage to the DNA during cell renewal, chromosomes contain special structures called telomeres that protect the delicate strands as they unravel and reform. Think of them as the plastic caps on the ends of your shoelaces. The more times the DNA is “tied” and “untied”, the shorter the telomeres become until, perhaps after 100 renewals, the telomeres disappear altogether and the DNA starts to fray. And that is the beginning of the end for the cell.

So, one way to think of our life expectancy is to consider that we are only as old as our telomeres. The longer they are, the longer you are likely to live, and vice versa, as children with the rare condition progeria discover to their cost. A child with progeria is born with unusually short telomeres (roughly the same as those normally found in a 70 or 80-year-old) and ages at an incredible rate, with few living beyond their early teens.

Unfortunately, human adult cells don’t have any way of repairing damaged telomeres, so cell death is inevitable, but a repair enzyme — telomerase — does exist in sperm and the female egg. Researchers in America have managed to insert the genes that produce it into adult skin cells and two years later they were still happily dividing without their telomeres getting any shorter.

Producing a potentially immortal skin cell in a Petri dish in a lab is a long way from significantly extending human life expectancy, but it is a step in the right direction and the solution is likely to come from genetic engineering rather than from some as-yet-undiscovered natural panacea. And it is not so much if, as when.

Any such breakthrough is going to happen too late to help most of us — something that I am actually quite pleased about, as I have no desire to live for ever. I just want to enjoy a full and active life before dropping dead quite unexpectedly some time in my eighties.

What does 10 Years Younger feel like?..

I don't think there has been any reason stated, why bother !!

What does 10 Years Younger feel like?

We love TV makeover shows, but can their life-changing claims be a reality? We find out at 10 Years Younger Live

Woman sitting in a hairdresser's chair having extensions put in


Kate Spicer at the 10 Years Younger Live show at Earls Court

Lying by my bed is a little pile of silky human hair. My boyfriend keeps asking if I can throw it away, as it freaks him out. But I want to remember that Sunday evening when I clawed and wrenched at my head, trying to pull out the temporary hair extensions that had been put in as part of an exciting makeover package. I could also have kept the white sheets, turned a rich shade of orangey brown despite my fake tan promising to “leave no stain after 20 minutes”. Then again, I could have bottled the excitement of the prospect of having my teeth whitened, before learning that what I really needed was £15,000 of cosmetic dentistry — but not to worry, I could get finance for that. As the dentist said, having your teeth beautified “changes people’s lives for ever”.

I hear this claim a lot during my day at 10 Years Younger Live, the popular Channel 4 show come to life for the first time, for commercial gain, at Earls Court Exhibition Centre. We live in an era of makeover madness; we are obsessed by the fairy-tale miracle that a total transformation promises. We are the frogs and we want stylists, surgeons and hairdressers to kiss our inner princesses to life. And we want them to do it really quickly. The makeover show is now a stalwart of television schedules. Over the three days of 10 Years Younger Live, thousands of women tramp up to Earls Court to meet the experts and take part in a live makeover experience. As I walk through the door, there is a roar more akin to a live music gig: one lucky lady’s “reveal” is in progress.

The 10 Years Younger show is but one variation on the familiar television makeover theme. Take one saggy old bag off the street, ask people how old they think they are — cue negative answers — and proceed to remodel them by any means available: new clothes, a nip and a tuck, glow-in-the dark teeth, new hair. Then see if people will judge them significantly younger — cue applause and, hopefully, tears. That’s the recipe, we can’t get enough of it, and it’s having an effect, with 10% of people surveyed in Britain in 2007 claiming that television and magazine makeovers were the main reason they had had or would have cosmetic surgery.

At the Earls Court show there are two distinct groups. First, middle-aged females in couples and gangs, saying things like: “Well, it’s time, I’m in my forties. We’re here to make ourselves look better.” Although it feels cruel to judge this group, many of them have “let themselves go”, as it is described in the women’s weeklies. But judge we must. As one of the well-groomed reps on one of the stands whispers to me: “I don’t know how some women manage to get themselves into that state. You should be working on yourself all the time, not waiting for an overnight miracle.” Not far away, on a stand flagged “Get Your Dream Body”, women stand on a vigorously vibrating exercise machine. It is yours to take home for £300 and, as the rep says, “it’s the easy way to health and fitness”.

Hmmm. Is there such a thing? Everywhere fairy tales are being sold to women hungry for magic and happy endings. Which might explain why the second group in attendance is mothers with their young daughters, two generations of the show’s fans. A little girl, Romana, 8, stands in awe, waiting for the autograph of the show’s resident hairdresser, Andrew Barton. She isn’t here for the botulinum toxin or the £600 La Prairie face cream (it’s got platinum in it, so it must be good). She is here for the magic of seeing an ugly duckling turn into a swan.

Admittedly, I myself am not merely there to observe from a comfortably superior position, but am equally ready to drop my notepad and submit to the promise of a quick fix. I join the queue for my own Earls Court mini-makeover.

I rapidly undergo all the elements that this requires. Temporary hair extensions are woven onto my head, and I have my first fake tan — and my last (that stuff is stinky and it makes you look a queer orangey colour). Then a visit to the facial-massage lady — who very cleverly takes wrinkles out of my face with her fingers and claims to be able to replicate the dewrinkling effects of Botox with regular massage alone. Much as it pains me to do so, I have to turn down free Botox, because I am not a great believer in getting any old Dr Joe on a stand at Earls Court Exhibition Centre to paralyse my facial muscles (even if that doctor has been on the telly).

Perhaps it’s time to start looking at the makeover cult as a female sport; a cheap, fizzy-pop cultural activity, much like ogling fat/thin/haggard/oversurgeried celebs in Heat and Grazia. It’s about as real as Katie and Peter, and as filling and nourishing as a packet of Monster Munch. When I walk out of Earls Court, the photographer says I look “much better”. And I’m sure I do, but the next day I wake up the same person. Only with a little pile of someone else’s hair by my bed.

THE TV SHOWS THAT GOT US HOOKED

Extreme Makeover The big daddy of the television makeover show, Extreme Makeover first aired in America in 2002, following men and women undergoing plastic surgery, exercise regimes and styling overhauls before the “final reveal” in front of friends and family. It was dropped in 2007 after ratings slumped.

The Swan Shamelessly traded on fairy-tale logic: ugly duckling is transformed into beautiful swan. The female contestants competed to enter a “pageant” in the series finale to become “the Swan”. Ratings dropped and this US show was cancelled in 2005.

How to Look Good Naked Popular makeover show fronted by Gok Wan that favours clever styling and “you go, girl” sisterhood over the surgeon’s knife. Gok restyles contestants, then they pose naked in a public place (to prove they love their bodies, duh).

10 Years Younger The UK’s answer to Extreme Makeover has undergone a makeover of its own. With a new smiley presenter, Myleene Klass, at the helm, it now covers two makeovers per show, with one woman taking on natural procedures and the other opting for cosmetic surgery.

Dr 90210 Another US import, this is filmed from the doctor’s angle. Viewers are treated to more consultation and operating theatre footage, which, despite the goriness, offers a more rounded insight into what it means to go under the knife.

Joanna McGarry

Link..

Girls War: How the world would be a better place with women in charge..

But the world would be a much better, superior, enlightened and friendly place when women run..

You have heard the same lies and mis-information as I have..

"Women are better managers" scream one feminist from the New York Times..

Yea !! Right..

‘‘The scuffle then went to the bottom of the stairs where from behind [Ms Fegan] grabbed me in a headlock and broke my necklace,’’ she said.

‘‘I have bruises and marks on me from the altercation.’’

Still want to ignore the DV stats ?
The workers, united…
Andrew Bolt – Wednesday, July 29, 09 (10:02 am)

If they do this to each other, heaven knows what they’ll do to a poor boss:

Police were called to the headquarters of the Health Services Union No. 1 branch after a tussle involving the national secretary, Kathy Jackson, and her arch enemy, state president Pauline Fegan. Last night Ms Jackson obtained an interim intervention order against Ms Fegan, saying she now feared for her safety and would press charges.

Ms Fegan in turn accused Ms Jackson of starting the fight and wrote to the union’s national executive, calling on it to immediately stand down the national secretary for ‘‘abusing and assaulting members’’....

Ms Jackson told the Melbourne Magistrates Court that when the tug of war started, the two officials yelled out for Ms Fegan to help.

‘‘The scuffle then went to the bottom of the stairs where from behind [Ms Fegan] grabbed me in a headlock and broke my necklace,’’ she said. ‘‘I have bruises and marks ...”

Notice no mention that only women were involved !!!
Union rivalry turns violent in office stairwell

Paul Austin
July 29, 2009

ONE of Victoria’s most powerful unions is in chaos after a fight broke out yesterday between two of its leaders.

Police were called to the headquarters of the Health Services Union No. 1 branch after a tussle involving the national secretary, Kathy Jackson, and her arch enemy, state president Pauline Fegan.

Last night Ms Jackson obtained an interim intervention order against Ms Fegan, saying she now feared for her safety and would press charges.

Ms Fegan in turn accused Ms Jackson of starting the fight and wrote to the union’s national executive, calling on it to immediately stand down the national secretary for ‘‘abusing and assaulting members’’.

The scuffle is the latest eruption in a bitter battle for control of the ALP-affiliated union between forces loyal to Ms Fegan and supporters of Ms Jackson.

Yesterday’s fight, on a stairwell at the South Melbourne headquarters, involved a ‘‘tug of war’’ between Ms Jackson and two members of the union’s board of management over a box of documents.

Ms Jackson said last night she believed Ms Fegan’s supporters were removing from the building union records relating to an investigation into alleged impropriety by Ms Fegan.

She said Ms Fegan was under investigation over the union buying many thousands of dollars of promotional goods from a company run by her husband.

But Ms Fegan, who denies any wrongdoing over the purchases, said the box contained nothing more than bulk copies of the union’s monthly newsletter.

Ms Jackson told the Melbourne Magistrates Court that when the tug of war started, the two officials yelled out for Ms Fegan to help.

‘‘The scuffle then went to the bottom of the stairs where from behind [Ms Fegan] grabbed me in a headlock and broke my necklace,’’ she said.

‘‘I have bruises and marks on me from the altercation.’’

In an email to national executive members last night, Ms Fegan said Ms Jackson had been ‘‘aggressive and antagonistic’’.

‘‘One of the committee members has sustained injuries which have been reported to the police and is seeking to press charges against Kathy Jackson,’’ Ms Fegan wrote.

One of the board of management members involved in the tussle, Dolores Bannon, told The Age last night: ‘‘I’m still in an awful state of shock. I’m afraid for my life to go back into that office now.’’

She said her arm was now in a sling. She had given a statement to police and intended to press assault charges against Ms Jackson.

Link..