17.9.09

Australian Bureau of Statistics: Personal Safety Survey.

In 2006 the Australian Government published In Matters of Personal Safety, a report recording the levels of violence experienced by men and women. The survey defined violence as including “any incident involving the occurrence, attempt or threat of either physical or sexual assault”. It concluded that 5.8 per cent of Australian women experienced violence so defined in the 12 months prior to the survey, as did 10.8 per cent of men. The figures are summarised in the two flow diagrams below:





The source for these charts is Personal Safety Survey 2005, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). available here.

More Information From StraightStatistics.org..

Further to this information are the podcasts introduced to explain this survey as well as explain the ongoing mis-information promoted by some Government Departments and Selective Groups..

Deliberately Lying About Domestic Violence Part One..

Deliberately Lying About Domestic Violence Part Two..

Deliberately Lying About Domestic Violence Part Three..


Eqwalitee..

Feminist version = equality..




From Curb Feminists..

Police Kept Busy on False Rape and Sexual Assualt Claims by Women..

Let's see, Canada, England and America..Sound familiar, well apparently slow learning is contagious amongst females in those countries..

Making false claims of rape, sexual abuse, women sexually assaulting young boys or just downright lying must be part of the semester. What other possible explanation could there be ?

Student recants sexual assault claim

'Friday afternoon, ISU Public Safety announced that the female victim in the reported sexual attack on Sept. 4 recanted her statement and is being charged with false informing.
The female in the case, Erin Conley, 19, a second semester non-preference major, reported Tuesday that she had been approached in the HMSU Commons in the early afternoon Friday by a man trying to sell her a magazine subscription, said Bill Mercier, director of ISU Public Safety. The man then asked to be shown around campus. 
Conley reported that when they arrived at her room in the Lincoln Quads, he sexually attacked her....
Conley is being charged with false informing, a class D misdemeanor. She is scheduled to appear in Terre Haute City Courclass Dt on Sept. 16.'


Teen admits to false sexual assault claim

'A high school girl who falsely reported she had been sexually assaulted by a classmate was put on 10 months probation Thursday in Sarnia court.
The 16-year-old pleaded guilty to making the false report to Sarnia police in the spring. 
The girl and a male student went to a park near their school for consensual sexual activity before returning to school. 
She later told police she had been assaulted by the boy. 
A police investigation determined it was a false allegation but not before the boy was interviewed by police and the girl underwent a sexual assault examination at the hospital. 
The girl admitted the allegation was false. 
The girl's mental health issues played a large part in the false report, said defence lawyer Noelle Wright. 
The boy had developmental issues but the girl did not take advantage of him during the incident, said Wright.'


Canada: B.C. female teacher is given 6 months in jail and counseling for sexually assaulting student

'VANCOUVER, B.C. — A former private school teacher who sexually assaulted one of her teenaged students and then gossiped about it to his friends is going to jail for six months and will spend two years on probation.
A provincial court judge in Vancouver heard the teacher, who can't be named, convinced the Grade 11 student that if he were sexually active he would be more confident.
After the two had sex, the teen learned the woman had phoned two of his closest friends and talked about what they had done, his lack of experience and her frustration.
While the woman initially denied having sex with the student, she entered a guilty plea in May to touching for a sexual purpose while in a position of trust.
On top of the six-month jail term, the former teacher also has to give a sample of her DNA, can't have any contact with males between the ages of 14-and 18-years-old, and has been ordered to attend counselling.'


Oregon teacher jailed on ’sex’ accusations

'HEPPNER, Ore. — The Morrow County sheriff's office arrested a female teacher accused of having sex with two boys, 15 and 17.
The sheriff's office says 30-year-old teacher was taken into custody Monday and lodged at the Umatilla County Jail on charges of sexual misconduct and rape....
The sheriff's office says the incidents began before the end of the last school year and continued through the middle of July. Morrow County District Attorney Elizabeth Ballard says she plans to present the case to a grand jury this week.
Superintendent Mark Burrows says the teacher has been a "super" teacher. The district placed her on administrative leave last week following accusations of inappropriate contact with minors.'
 
Canada: 45 days in jail for teacher who had ’sex’ with boy 

'OSHAWA -- A former Durham Region teacher has been sentenced to 45 days in jail and a year of house arrest after admitting to a sexual relationship with a teenaged boy.
Jill Sparks, of Bowmanville, trembled visibly as she offered a tearful apology in an Oshawa courtroom Monday morning, often sobbing as she described the toll her crime and conviction have taken on herself and her family....
Justice Halikowski imposed a sentence of 45 days in jail in addition to a 12-month conditional sentence, during which Ms. Sparks will be confined to her home. She will be on the federal sex offenders list for 20 years and has been ordered to submit a sample of her DNA. She is prohibited for 10 years from working or volunteering with children.'
 

UK: Female teacher facing jail for having ’sex’ with 15-year-old pupil 

'Madeleine Martin, 39, is facing jail after she admitted sexual activity with the boy at a school in Tameside, Greater Manchester, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
The teacher, who is now estranged from her husband, stood with her head bowed in the dock at Manchester Crown Court as she pleaded guilty to ten charges of sexual activity with a child under 16....

The judge told her that she would also be registered as a sex offender under the Sexual Offences Act and would also be investigated by the Independent Safeguarding Authority who would decide whether she should be banned from working with children or vulnerable adults.'

From MisandryReview..

Equality for women in war is lunacy..

As I have stated before, I have no particular interest in seeing women on the front line for several reasons..

Mainly because the American Armed Forces have already indicated that they will be forced to de-sensitise all male soldiers against the automatic, inbuilt, DNA fixed response that men have in protecting women even though denial is there and it's not anything that is recognised by feminists either..

But alive and rampant it is..

Also, as stated in the article, there is the strength and fitness issues that allows men to easily toss a 48kg shell into a cannon and he can actually carry his own tool kit should the need arise..



Equality for women in war is lunacy

Greg Sheridan, Foreign editor | September 17, 2009

Article from: The Australian

THE suggestion that women should be able to join all front-line combat units of the Australian Army, including the Special Air Service, infantry rifle companies and the tank squadron, is the single stupidest idea I have heard in my life.

If implemented it will contribute to the obnoxious dynamic in our society that denatures women and men. It will also diminish the effectiveness of the Australian Army, which will be less deployable, and less likely to be deployed.

It is wrong on practical grounds, and in principle. First, the practical. Even the Israeli army, which, out of bitter necessity, has been at the forefront of integrating women, does not allow them to serve in combat infantry units or in tanks.

The situation in the Australian Defence Force is complex. In the navy and air force, where close personal combat is not a core part of the mission, women can serve in most roles. In the army, women cannot serve in roles that have personal combat as part of their core task and in some other jobs where the physical demands are too onerous, such as field artillery. Following a change in 2005, they can serve in infantry headquarters and logistics, including in combat zones.

The practical limitations often relate to strength. An artillery shell can weigh 48kg. Very few women can easily lift such shells. As the systems become more automated, this might change, but you then have, as the Canadians have found, terrible problems if your automatic system breaks down.

The new push, announced by Defence Personnel, Materiel and Science Minister Greg Combet, is to have all tasks assessed for their physical requirements and then anyone who can meet those requirements can join the relevant units. At the practical level this falls down in countless ways. If the push is on to make the inclusion of women a priority, history tells us the physical standards will be eroded. There is no ultimate objectivity about these standards. They have evolved simply as a result of what very fit, very strong blokes can do. You can change the standards if you want to. The result will be a less effective army.

Many practical considerations arise from the special nature of military culture and the extreme demands of battle. In close combat male soldiers will try to protect female soldiers. This is a law of human nature. The unit's effectiveness will suffer.

A military unit is bound by common identity, by deep traditions of comradely bonding. The romantic liaisons that inevitably develop in mixed gender units militate against the absolute teamwork, group identity and lack of favouritism that characterise military units in combat. A lack of knowledge of military culture leads to a lack of respect for it and then to policies that compromise effectiveness.

But all the practical arguments, which have prevented nearly all serious militaries from using women in these direct, personal combat roles, are secondary to the question of principle.

The best recent Australian writing on military matters comes from retired major general Jim Molan in his book on the Iraq war and his newspaper columns. One of Molan's central themes is that the laws of war, the moral conduct of war, not only permit but require ferocious, sustained, terrible violence.

Mainstream Western ethics have always recognised that occasionally a war is just and must be waged. For a war to be just it must be in a just cause, it must be a last resort with reasonable alternatives exhausted, it must not allow greater evil than it combats, and there must be a reasonable chance of success. But once you are involved in a war, you must do everything, within the laws of war, to win and win as quickly as possible. You can be absolutely sure that your enemy will not resile from extreme violence.

All societies have recognised that they therefore need warriors. The warriors are not barbarians. They are brave, skilled, disciplined individuals who risk their lives for something bigger than themselves. The overwhelming majority of people who have lived, and the overwhelming majority of people and societies today, recognise that the warriors are men. This is something that most people know, even if they deny it.

As with so many issues, normal people are smarter here than intellectuals. Is there a home in Australia in which, if attacked by a burglar, the husband would not respond first?

The wilder shores of feminism, which seek to eradicate all differences between men and women, have never been inhabited by normal people. Let me give you an example. I follow rugby league, physically the most demanding of sports. In my team, the Canterbury Bulldogs, a couple of weeks ago the halfback Brett Kimmorley suffered a depressed fracture of the cheekbone. He has multiple fractures and a titanium plate, held in by six bolts, has been inserted into his face. In 10 days or so Kimmorley will play for the Bulldogs, probably against Parramatta, and may tackle the human wrecking ball Fuifui Moimoi.

Part of my admiration for Kimmorley is admiration for his physical courage. Other sports require courage too, but rugby league requires it in this stark and brutal way. I do not want to see women playing in the National Rugby League. No doubt you could find some single Amazonian woman, out of 11 million Australian women, who could do it with no greater risk of injury than the blokes. But why would you? What purpose would it serve? It would be madness. Yet the SAS, infantry rifle companies and the tank squadron, because they deal in instant life and death at close quarters, are infinitely more demanding than rugby league.

Men and women are equal but they are not the same. Each can do some things the other can't. Suppose one day science finds a way to install an artificial womb in a man so that he can have a baby. If we could do that, would we want to?

Our society is awash with violence. Just walk through the centre of Melbourne about 1am any Saturday night if you don't believe me. Much of that violence is directed at women. To remove any notion that women are special, that men have an absolute obligation to protect women, is to coarsen and infantilise our society. It seems only five minutes ago that the feminist movement was telling us that women were superior because they were inherently less violent. I'm inclined to agree with that proposition. Now it seems feminists are quite happy about violence so long as women get an equal chance to do it.

The women in the ADF are a credit to the nation. But to make women eligible for front-line, personal combat roles is not liberation or equality, still less enlightenment. It is a punctuation mark in the larger grammar of madness.


Comments..

meantanker of Bundaberg 9:18am today

Frequently I disagree with your right wing views,Greg but on this occasion I think that you have nailed it.Equality has its place but the frontline in a warzone is not that place. We have been witness to the diminution in effectiveness of Police Services with policewomen attempting to do the job of former burly coppers. Equal opportunity and a tertiary degree counts for little as nightclubs empty their drunken patrons onto streets in the early hours of a weekend morning. There are physical limitations to some occupations, and society does recognize these. Warmaking is one such. How many women would want to serve at the pointy end anyway? Let's leave the ugly tasks in war to the group best equipped to do them.


500 Things you can no longer do..

In the last thirty years or so our lives have become surrounded by prohibition and disapproval. There are literally hundreds of things our grandparents took for granted that we can no longer do.

Some are included in the thousands of new laws passed since New Labour took power. Some are the pronouncements of scientists and self-proclaimed experts in the fields of health or public safety. Some are the result of bungling by the police, or misinterpretation of the law. Others are diktats from the European Union.

Many are caused by local government officials flexing their muscles and throwing their weight about. Still more emanate from our culture of political correctness, from our fondness for casting blame and leaping to litigation, and from the eagerness with which we take offence at the least little thing or see offence where none exists.

A huge number of them - just over 200 in fact - are things you shouldn't do, wear, live in, ride on, smoke, drink, eat, use or visit because they'll give you cancer. In some cases they are contradictory - for instance, breast-feeding increases your chances of cancer, but then so does not breast-feeding. It just goes to show that you can prove anything you like with statistics. 99% of murder victims were wearing clothes at the time of their deaths, so obviously clothes increase your chances of being murdered.



1. You can't call yourself a Yid. If you are one, that is.

2. Or, according to Tottenham Hotspur FC, you can't call yourself a Yid if you aren't one.

3. You can't carry celery when attending a Chelsea match.

4. You can't send your child to university if you went to one yourself. I mean, be fair. You had your turn.

5. You can't lie in the sun in your garden or the park or at the beach without being lectured about Global Warming.

6. You can't lie in the sun in your garden or the park or at the beach without being moved on by some local council jobsworth armed with a £50 fixed penalty notice.

7. You can't lie in the sun in your garden or the park or at the beach without being told to wear Factor 1,000 in case you burn.

8. You can't lie in the sun in your garden or the park or at the beach without being harangued because it offends Islam.

9. You can't lie in the sun in your garden or the park or at the beach without being suspected of child abuse.

10. You can't drop a (completely bio-degradable, in my case) fag end in the gutter.

11. You can't call anyone a black bastard, because that's racist.

12. You can't tell anyone about someone else calling people black bastards, because that's racist too.

13. You can't tell anyone about someone else telling someone else about calling people black bastards, because that's racist squared.

14. You can't stand up and cheer when your team score. They've given you seats, so you can damn-well sit in them.

15. You can't drive with your eyes on the road rather than the speedometer.

16. You can't do, write or say anything without looking over your shoulder in case someone doesn't like it.

17. You can't send out of the country people who've come here illegally or come as our guests and then commit crimes or plot to kill us.

18. You can't fly without being made to feel guilty.

19. You can't drive without being made to feel guilty.

20. You can't smoke without being made to feel guilty.

21. You can't eat without being made to feel guilty.

22. You can't put salt on your chips without feeling guilty.

23. You can't eat chips without feeling guilty.

24. You can't eat fish without feeling guilty (unless you're Japanese).

25. You can't have sex with a woman without being made to feel guilty because she isn't a man.

26. You can't drive a nice big car without some woman in dungarees giving you a hard time.

27. You can't refer to someone as a cream-puff without being arrested.

28. You can't have a bonfire and fireworks without some tosser from elfin safety knocking on your door and telling you (a) how to do it, and/or (b) not to do it.

29. You can't ogle a barmaid without being accused of sexual harassment.

30. You can't find it a bit odd and slightly distasteful when men fiddle around with each other's privates or stick things up their bottoms.

31. You can't work with, around or close to children without being branded a potential pervert.

For the rest..
Link to Grumpy Old Sod..

Domestic Violence: Aren't threats against the law ?

One must pose the question as to whether or not this would be labeled as a potential domestic violence situation or even threatening abusive behaviour..

Here we have a confession from a female admitting that not only is she violent but would have the potential of violence, abusive and thereby the potential of harming anyone in a state of uncontrolled rage..

Really..

And use a what "

'I'd never own a gun for that reason. I wouldn't shoot to kill. But I would shoot him in the leg, for sure,' she said.
This may be the ranting of an immature child incapable of conscious thought but isn't there a law about threatening anyone with potential abuse..

Having been labeled already...
Fox, who was recently branded 'dumb as a rock'


'My temper is ridiculously bad,' the 23-year-old told Rolling Stone magazine.

'I've had to say to Brian, "You have to go and stop talking to me, because I'm going to kill you. I'm going to stab you with something, please leave".
Enlarge Megan Fox

Foxy: The interview appears in October's Rolling Stone

Fox, who was recently branded 'dumb as a rock' by crew members from Transformers, said that she has such a fierce temper she could never own a gun as she could turn it on her on-again, off-again boyfriend.

'I'd never own a gun for that reason. I wouldn't shoot to kill. But I would shoot him in the leg, for sure,' she said.

Link..

16.9.09

Woman accused of making false rape accusation..

We are obviously getting thru our message concerning false rape allegations and naming false accusers..

This is the problem when women make false rape claims and that is the issue. It stops other people from coming forward and not the argument feminists consistently lie about. Their stance is that the female should never be named even if she is a liar..

I believe that feminists are totally wrong again..

Name the rapist if he or she has been proven by a court to be guilty and not before. Name all false accusers once that has been established via investigation..

Not too hard, seems fair to me..

Woman accused of making false rape accusation
By Stabroek staff | August 15, 2009 in Local News

Magistrate Priya Beharry granted $60,000 bail to a woman accused of knowingly providing the police with false information that she had been raped.

It is alleged that on May 20 at Georgetown, Plachette Ross, a sales representative of 24 Prospect, East Bank Demerara, knowingly gave to Sergeant Cedrick Gravesande; a police officer, certain information namely that she was raped intending thereby to cause Gravesande to arrest the man.

She pleaded not guilty to the charge of giving false information when it was read to her on Friday in the Georgetown Magistrate’s Court.
The virtual complainant did not attend court.

Police Prosecutor Munilall Seetaram told the court that on the day in question the accused stole the man’s cell phone. He added that Ross told the VC that she was going to return the phone to him but instead the woman went to the Ministry of Home Affairs and alleged that the man had raped her.

Ross was ordered to appear in Court Three on September 30.


Link..

Teenage girls more prone to violence against dating partners than boys..

Women have always demonstrated that they are more violent as way too many studies have already indicated way past any denial..

For those of you living in ignorance have a look here..

SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 256 scholarly investigations: 201 empirical studies and 55 reviews and/or analysis, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 253,500.
Way beyond argument..

Teenage girls more prone to violence against dating partners than boys
Most youth violence takes place outside couple relationships

Teenage girls more prone to violence against dating partners than boys
print this
Finnish boys aged 15 to 16 are more likely to experience violence from their dating partners than girls of the same age. The matter comes out in a study by the National Research Institute on Legal Policy.
An extensive survey on youth crime shows that 22 per cent of boys in a dating relationship had been hit at least once by their girlfriends. Only six per cent of girls had experienced similar events.
The most serious types of violence is striking someone with a fist or a hard object, or kicking. Nine per cent of boys and two per cent of girls had experienced such attacks.
Being grabbed, or prevented from moving was the only type of violence that birls experienced more often than boys. The figures were 19 per cent and 14 per cent respectively.

The results were not very surprising, and followed the lines of a survey conducted in 2004, says Venla Salmi, who conducted the present study.
She says that one likely reason for the greater amount of dating violence perpetrated by girls is attributable to attitudes. The threshold for girls to commit violent acts may be lower than for boys because violence perpetrated by girls is not taken as seriously as that committed by boys.

The study also finds that Finnish teenagers tend to be victims of violence from a dating partner more frequently than adult women do.
There is no data available on violence in dating relationships experienced by adult men.

Most of the violence experienced by young people in Finland takes place outside couple relationships, with 29 per cent of the young people who are dating saying that they had been attacked by someone.
The material for the study was compiled last year, with more than 5,800 young people aged 15 and 16 responding.
Questionnaires are seen to be more reliable measures of the frequency of violence than crime statistics, because only a small proportion of violence is ever reported to the police.

How more and more of us women have an inflated sense of our own fabulousness..

It would appear to be truth time...

We(women) have trouble accepting criticism and extending empathy because we are so preoccupied with ourselves.

The media panders to this illusion daily by never criticizing women on any occasion and showing them only to be "winners" dressed in executive suits, driving up market cars and over the top with make up, coiffured hair and brilliant smiles designed to cause eye damage at 50 meters..

Go out into the streets and that image is shattered completely..

The other sad part about all of this is that they will never admit they are the problem but still manage to shift the blame to my sex at will, just to appease that massive ego..

So we have reasonable guys like this recognising precisely where the problem lies..

David Baxter (not his real name) is a 40-year-old management consultant. Previously married for nine years, he joined a dating agency in the summer.

He says he's not perfect, but is told he's an eligible and pleasant guy with a lot to offer.

'I've had three successive dates recently with ladies in the late 30s to early 40s age bracket that have left me dumbfounded,' he said.

I've never come across such massive egos, such arrogance and lack of basic courtesy.

'It was as if these particular dates were a forum for them to tell me how exceptional they were. One told me repeatedly how many young guys at the gym asked her out; another was very artificial.

'You sensed that they absolutely worshipped themselves, though none of them was drop-dead gorgeous or had amazing personalities, jobs or anything else to set them apart and elevate themselves into some superior position.

And ofcourse, how does that all tie in with feminist doctrine and hysterics..

You go giirrrllll....

'I know there are a lot of single women who say things like they're too independent, too feisty, too confident or too successful for men. Or they claim that men are intimidated by strong, intelligent and independent women.

'But this is simply not the case. I think they just tell themselves this. It's a way of rationalising things. It's as if it's easier for them to believe their own myths than to face reality - that they are completely ordinary.'


About time you stepped up to reality and stared it down, ego permitting..

The ego epidemic: How more and more of us women have an inflated sense of our own fabulousness

By Lucy Taylor
Last updated at 7:55 AM on 14th September 2009

Us women are more egocentric and narcissistic than we ever used to be, according to extensive research by two leading psychologists.

More of us have huge expectations of ourselves, our lives and everyone in them. We think the universe resolves around us, with a deluded sense of our own fabulousness, and believe we are cleverer, more talented and more attractive than we actually are.

We have trouble accepting criticism and extending empathy because we are so preoccupied with ourselves.

Actresses Kim Cattrall, Cynthia Nixon, Sarah Jessica Parker and Kristin Davis on location for the new movie 'Sex and the City 2'

Got it all: Actresses Kim Cattrall (left to right), Cynthia Nixon, Sarah Jessica Parker and Kristin Davis on location for the new movie 'Sex and the City 2'

Am I making you angry by telling you this? It figures. Narcissistic or egotistical women do have an overwhelming sense of entitlement and arrogance.

Of course, I joke, but researchers say there is growing evidence of an epidemic of ego-itis everywhere.

Once a traditionally male syndrome, narcissism generally begins at home and in schools, where children are praised excessively, often spoiled rotten and given the relentless message that they are 'special'.

Psychology professors Jean Twenge and Keith Campbell analysed studies on 37,000 college students in 2006.

In a survey, 30 per cent of them said they believed they should get good grades simply for turning up.

NET WORTH: Facebook is a boon for those with narcissistic traits, who use the networking site for self-promotion, says a recent study

And it's not just about how intelligent they think they are. In the workplace, in friendships, even in motherhood, the pervading culture seems to have become one of competitiveness, superiority and one-upmanship.

But the sphere in which the signs of self-obsession are perhaps most obvious, and the consequences most immediately felt, is the dating one.

In a recent magazine article, four women in their late 20s and 30s shared their thoughts about why they were still single. A 39-year-old beauty director claimed to be too independent for a relationship.

A 38-year-old music agent attributed her single status to the fact she was an alpha female - independent, feisty, strong-minded, high-achieving and intimidating.

Graphic of a woman looking at her reflection in a heart-shaped pond

Mirror, mirror: Are woman increasingly believing that the universe revolves around them?



She pointed out that she owned a gorgeous flat with gorgeous things in it, had a nice car, was a member of a fancy gym and wore designer dresses. 'I do what I like, when I like,' she said.

She'd been told, and appears to believe, that she's too successful and too well-educated for most men.

The third woman, a 30-year- old arts writer and curator, has been having too much fun to settle down.

Another, a 29-year-old, said she was too picky. She was looking for a guy who is (just) tall enough. And (just about) good-looking enough (but not too good-looking so that she'd play second fiddle).

He needs to be successful, solvent and driven. He must also be long on genuinely good jokes, with a decent sideline in bad ones that only she finds funny.

He needs to 'speak good restaurant', to have no special dietary requirements and to always be discerning without ever being fussy.
A businesswoman sits on a chair with a sheet of paper in her hand

Me, me, me: The workplace is one area where women can develop an over-inflated view of themselves

He needs to be clever without ever making her feel stupid. He needs to 'get' but not 'know' fashion...and so the list went on.

She concluded that she would rather eat wasps than share her Sunday with anyone who fails to measure up to her idea of Mr Perfect.

Of course, there is nothing wrong with having high expectations. But being delusional and having a totally unrealistic blueprint are an altogether different matter.

And they often go hand in hand with acute ego-itis. As Margot Medhurt knows only too well.

She is the founder of Yours Sincerely, an Edinburgh-based personal dating and introduction agency for professionals. She has almost 30 years' experience in the industry and has noticed a significant rise in this phenomenon in recent years.

'It used to be that most women who joined a dating agency had a pretty good idea of where they stood in the eligibility stakes,' she said. 'But in the past few years, I've noticed that there are a significant number of women who don't.

'They tend to be in their 30s, and there is a wide discrepancy between how they perceive themselves and how others see them.

'They are often very plain, but see themselves as being absolutely fabulous, exceptional people.

'They invariably reject every guy's profile I send them. But if a guy rejects their profile, there is all hell to pay. There is disbelief. They are really saying: "I'm so fabulous. How dare he turn me down?"

'In the past few years, I've noticed a real sense of entitlement among this small group of women. The idea that a guy might not find them as amazing as they find themselves doesn't enter their head.

'They often become indignant and angry towards me, demanding to know why a guy dared to turn them down. Most people simply accept the facts of the dating game: some people will find you attractive and others won't, in the same way that you'll be drawn to some but not others.

Women today think the universe revolves around them and have a deluded sense of their abilities

'These women, however, are unable to get their heads around the fact that the rest of the world might not share the distorted, inflated view they have of themselves.'

She said she had a eureka moment when she read a recent article about the rise in narcissism among women.

According to the American research, there has been a 67 per cent increase in it over the past two decades, mainly among women.

An estimated ten per cent of the population suffers from narcissism as a full-blown personality disorder.

The symptoms include: a grandiose sense of self-importance; the belief that he or she is special or unique and in some way better - either intellectually or physically - than others; a requirement for excessive admiration; a sense of entitlement, whether to fame, fortune, success and happiness or simply to special treatment; enviousness of others or a belief that others are envious of him or her; an inability to empathise; an inability to admit a mistake; and haughty behaviour or attitude.
A couple share vegetables during a roast dinner meal

Food for thought: One woman said she would not share time with a man unless he was her ideal of Mr Perfect

What researchers have also identified, and are far more worried about, is what has been described as 'normal' narcissism - a cultural shift that has seen even non-narcissistic people seduced by the emphasis on material wealth, physical appearance and celebrity worship.

The researchers believe our culture brings out narcissistic behaviour in almost all of us.

'However, when I read that article and thought about the unrealistic expectations and sense of entitlement among some of the women, it really struck a chord.

'One of the cases that brought it home to me involved a 38-year-old businesswoman.

'I knew there were going to be problems right away. As soon as someone joins the agency, we get things moving very quickly - but this wasn't quick enough for this woman.

'She wanted a date immediately. The first man I sent her profile to declined an introduction and she was extremely cross. She couldn't accept it and she couldn't even be polite about it.

'In three weeks, three men turned her down. I explained that it takes time to meet someone but she just got angrier and angrier. She was demanding to know why these guys did this. I was trying to get the balance right - between being honest with her and being tactful.

'I think, ultimately, she had a very flawed perception of herself. And she almost couldn't bear that it was being challenged. It was as if she couldn't deal with the fact that some guys didn't think she was amazing - and she left.'

Men, traditionally regarded as the more self-centred of the species and the rogues of the mating game, are left scratching their heads and pondering Freud's famous question: what do women want?

David Baxter (not his real name) is a 40-year-old management consultant. Previously married for nine years, he joined a dating agency in the summer.

He says he's not perfect, but is told he's an eligible and pleasant guy with a lot to offer.

'I've had three successive dates recently with ladies in the late 30s to early 40s age bracket that have left me dumbfounded,' he said.

'I've never come across such massive egos, such arrogance and lack of basic courtesy.

'It was as if these particular dates were a forum for them to tell me how exceptional they were. One told me repeatedly how many young guys at the gym asked her out; another was very artificial.

'You sensed that they absolutely worshipped themselves, though none of them was drop-dead gorgeous or had amazing personalities, jobs or anything else to set them apart and elevate themselves into some superior position.

'I also thought it was quite telling that none of them had ever been married, engaged or had recently - or perhaps ever - been in a long-term relationship.

'I got the feeling that these women were living in a Sex And The City-inspired fantasy world. I also sensed that nobody would ever be good enough for them.

'They seem to be looking for something that doesn't exist: Mr Perfect, or perhaps some larger-than-life, dashingly handsome and unattainable character such as that portrayed by Mr Big. Nothing else will do.'

Despite his recent experience, David still considers himself lucky.

'I'm still positive about the whole thing, but I have friends who are not so optimistic and it's evident that encounters with these sort of women seriously erode their self-confidence, which is a real shame. There are a lot of genuine, decent guys out there who are getting a rough deal.'

Neil Hay is a 32-year-old former professional golfer-turned-financial consultant who lives on the outskirts of Edinburgh.

After taking some time out following the death of his mother, he joined a dating agency almost a year ago.

'It's made me terribly cynical, not just about the way women are, but also about what on earth it is that they are looking for in a guy,' he said.

'Of course, we all have standards and preferences. There's nothing wrong with that. But most of us are also realistic. We know that Cheryl Cole is out of our league.

'I had been hoping to meet someone who was quite nice-looking, with a good personality, someone to go for dinner and to the cinema and have a decent conversation with. But I'm left feeling that this isn't what women are looking for.

'It's as if they want to be swept off their feet right from the first date, as if they're waiting for someone like Brad Pitt or George Clooney. They're not interested in a regular, normal, decent guy. That's not good enough for them.

'I spent three hours on a date with one woman. I thought we got on brilliantly, but then she said she didn't want to meet again.

'This has happened a few times. It makes me think that if you don't live up to their perfect fantasy, then that's it. It's game over before you've even had any chance to begin to get to know each other.

'It does dent your confidence. I'm left thinking either that there's something wrong with me or that I'll just never be whatever it is that these women are looking for.

'I know there are a lot of single women who say things like they're too independent, too feisty, too confident or too successful for men. Or they claim that men are intimidated by strong, intelligent and independent women.

'But this is simply not the case. I think they just tell themselves this. It's a way of rationalising things. It's as if it's easier for them to believe their own myths than to face reality - that they are completely ordinary.'

15.9.09

The Gubmint Would Run This Place Better If There Were No People..

Obviously, if it was not for all those bloody people out there the gubmint would be able to do a much better job..

It's the people that make governing so hard, we would be better off without them..

It's the peoples fault, the gubmint would be quite capable of performing the way it should if only there were not so many people.

The world would a better place if it wasn't for all you people being here..

People should be banned from all gubmint activity..


Culling Out the Population, the Enlightened Liberal Way

Monday, September 14, 2009
By Carey Roberts

Progressives exist in a state of constant angst, agonizing over snail darters, incandescent light bulbs, and of course global warming. But the issue that drives liberals to a state of tongue-wagging, eyeball-popping hysteria is population growth — what doomsayer Paul Erlich once termed the “Population Bomb.”

And history shows liberals are willing to take almost any measure to keep the population in check – just so long as the program can be cloaked in mesmerizing happy-talk.

Want to stop the beating hearts of 46 million unborn children each year? Then just call it “promoting choice and empowering women” – doesn’t that sound wonderful!

Desire to kill off 30 million African children from the ravages of malaria

? Then ban DDT in the name of saving the bird shells!

Yearn to see the deadly AIDS epidemic continue to rage out of control? Then push the “safe sex” campaigns that tell teenagers to indulge in carefree sex, just so long as you use a condom.

And when all else fails, try forced sterilization. I’ve previously described how progressive-inspired racial purification schemes led to the sterilization of 400,000 undesirables in Nazi Germany: www.renewamerica.com/columns/roberts/090827 .

Sterilization is not merely a hush-hush liberal policy of a by-gone era. Sterilization continues to be topic of debate to the present day. And I’m not just talking about repressive societies like Communist China.

(As First Lady, Hillary Clinton decried China’s one-child policy as a violation of human rights. But as Secretary of State, Clinton completely swept the issue under the rug during her recent trip to China. But I digress.)

And now there’s a whole new chapter to the eugenics saga.

In 1977 Paul and Anne Erlich wrote Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. The book is so replete with Chicken-Little scenarios and mad-scientist nostrums that if I paraphrase, you’ll accuse me of making this up. So allow me to recite a few lines as you hum along to the tune of Three Blind Mice.

Paul and Anne Erlich begin by declaring, “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

That’s what’s called a living, breathing Constitution.

But compulsory abortion alone will not suffice: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men,” they urge.

For reasons unknown, these benevolent people say they prefer to target women.

How to bring this about? “The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control.”

Ever heard of Norplant?

If that fails, the Erlichs propose a back-up plan: “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” To meet stringent FDA standards, the sterilant “must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets or livestock.”

At least Fido and Fufu will be safe!

Admitting there are “very difficult political, legal and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems,” the Erlichs still express hope their idea will one day bear fruition.

Oh, I forgot to mention one important detail.

Ecoscience was also co-authored by John P. Holdren, recently named as President Obama’s chief science advisor. Considered an expert on global climate change, Holdren has a wide-ranging mandate to advise the president how science and technology impact domestic and international affairs.

To this day, Holdren has yet to repudiate any of the frightening proposals outlined in his book. So until the Sterilant-in-Chief departs from the Obama administration, my advice to you is this: Keep a close eye on the drinking-water.

The Fault Divorce: Now the arguments for..

Another attempt at undoing the society destroying methods feminists introduced many years ago..

They have never denied and have even admitted encouraging the destruction of marriage as well as relationships between the sexes and it would appear that it's time to wind back some of that damage and here we have a anti no fault spruiker from the most unlikeliest corner..

The landed gentry..

A dose of common sense on divorce


15th September 2009

This newspaper has never been slow to criticise that pillar of the liberal Establishment, Ruth Deech, for some of her more controversial decisions when she was chairman of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

But today she deserves nothing but praise for blowing a blast of fresh air into the debate over Britain's unjust and socially-destructive divorce laws.

In a lecture packed with common sense, the chairman of the Bar Standards Board argues that huge divorce settlements, which require husbands to give half their wealth to their ex-wives, are both unfair to men and demeaning to women.

Ruth Deech claims current rules regarding divorce settlements are demeaning and unfair

Ruth Deech claims current rules regarding divorce settlements are demeaning and unfair

Why, in this age when women demand equality at work, should ex-wives expect to be kept for life - even after short marriages that produced no children?

Disturbingly, as Baroness Deech points out, this is yet another example of a law imposed on us by the judiciary, without any reference to Parliament.

But it's on the wider issue of the easy availability of divorce and the damage it causes that Lady Deech most strongly challenges the received wisdom of the liberal consensus that dominates so much social thinking in modern Britain.

With only slight exaggeration, she says that after 40 years of 'reform', it's now easier to end a marriage than to terminate a tenancy or an employment contract.

Yet study after study has shown the huge harm divorce does to children and society at large.

So why do politicians duck this issue, when they are so quick to legislate on other less serious threats to children's wellbeing?

As Lady Deech puts it: 'It seems to be an unspoken political decision that attempts to make divorce more difficult are totally unacceptable.'

Isn't it time MPs took a long, hard look at that unspoken decision?

Lady Deech suggests Parliament should reintroduce the idea of fault into divorce, making those who want their marriages dissolved on the 'quicky' grounds of adultery or unreasonable behaviour wait a year before they can remarry or settle their maintenance.

How eminently sensible - which is one good reason why our politicians will almost certainly ignore her.

link..

Ministers retreat on child database..

As usual, governments are here to create problems for the general electorate and then pretend to rectify any situation which ain't broke. But never admit it..

Pedophile hysteria has vilified all men without ever bothering to admit that it's occurrence although repugnant to the many is somewhat limited to just a few psychotic individuals and the law is already in place to deal with them, be it male or female..

Three friends accused of killing a man after he was 'mistakenly identified as a paedophile'

Link..

Another plus for today's media..

And when I say just a few I am referring to some minutiae of population, so irrelevant that the ongoing witch hunt would be demonstrated to be just that..

It would appear that there are more astronauts in space than followers of that sickness but apparently the main stream media is unimpressed by facts so they continue with this needless witch hunt and milk it for all it's worth..

How many times have you read or watched another episode on this ongoing saga, intent on ensuring that parents are so frightened and scared witless that not only is constant monitoring of their child/ren warranted as far as g'mint's are concerned but while we have idiots in power to claim to rectify the situation at what cost ?

The ongoing reduction of our freedom..

"For the sake of the children", parents will tolerate anything (Nazis knew that) and here we have g'mint practicing that same propaganda..

Ministers retreat on child database

Ed Balls agrees to review controversial anti-paedophile vetting scheme

By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor

Tuesday, 15 September 2009

Moves to vet every adult who works with children are set to be watered down after the Government ordered a last-minute review of the controversial anti-paedophile scheme.

Ed Balls, the Children's Secretary, acted amid fury that the criminal record checks would affect parents who give lifts to children on behalf of sports teams or voluntary organisations such as the Scouts. The move comes after The Independent revealed that prominent children's authors, including Philip Pullman and Anthony Horowitz, have threatened to stop visiting schools rather than subject themselves to the "insulting" requirement.

Link..



Also we have one of the top ten Male-Haters in the world vying for leadership..

On a scale of 0-5, how much does this look like leadership positioning?
Peter Hoskin 5:35pm

Scoopmeister Paul Waugh has a cracking developing story over at his blog. He revealed earlier that Harriet Harman's people have been canvassing Labour party members with questions like:

"Who do you think is the best person to sell the Labour party?"

"On a scale of 0 to 5, how do you rate Harriet Harman?"

But, now, it turns out that there was another question on the list:

"On a scale of 0 to 5, how do you rate Gordon Brown?"

Smells fishy, doesn't it? Team Harman are claiming that she's just trying to keep in touch with the Labour grassroots, but it's very difficult not to see this as leadership positioning on her part. You can just imagine her sauntering into Brown's office, clutching a clipboard, and saying, "Well, Gordon, my internal polling shows that..."

But even if there isn’t any subversive intent behind these questions – and that's a big "if" – it's astonishing that Harman didn't first think about How They'd Look. With her summer turn as stand-in PM widely seen as a pitch for the party leadership, she should have steered clear of any similar controversy. While the last thing the current leader needs right now is his deputy asking voters to mark him out of five.

Link..

This comment summons Harman up nicely..

Chuck Unsworth
September 14th, 2009 5:55pm

If Labour are sufficiently deranged to elect Harman to the Leadership they will have effectively jettisoned all hope of re-election - in perpetuity. Harman neither knows or cares that her virulent and routine anti-male mouthings have antagonised at least half of the population. Does she pin her Leadership hopes on an all-female electorate, then?



But apparently we have not even begun to appreciate the shear malice and nastiness of biscuits..

Yep, that's what I said.."Biscuits"..

This week, a report relayed the alarming news that more than recession, swine flu, God’s wrath and global-warming-thingy, it is a simple packet of Rich Tea we should really be fearing. More than half of all Britons, it told us, borderline unbelievably, have been injured by biscuits. Insults to the flesh range from being scalded by hot tea or coffee while dunking, to breaking a tooth.

An estimated 25 million adults have been injured while eating during a tea or coffee break, with at least 500 landing themselves in hospital. Putting this into perspective, this makes having a biccie a more perilous activity than pot-holing, drag-racing, waterfall-punching, or auto-asphyxiation in a hotel room at 4am, off your face on minibar Bacardi Breezers.


Biscuits...

I tell you what, though. The more I think of it, the prouder I am of living in a country where we collate statistics on biscuit-related injuries. We don’t have poisonous snakes, earthquakes, volcanoes, deadly spiders that live under the toilet seat, a broiling underclass living in a shanty town on the outskirts of our capital city, Robert Mugabe as president, Osama bin Laden living in a cave, or a 26 per cent infection rate of HIV. Instead, the greatest threat to our green and pleasant land is a simple, moistened digestive.


Link..

Society deteriorating as it wallows in it's own ignorance..

Sometimes one reads an articles that so reflects one's thinking that you wonder why you did not write this exact comment..

Ok, I am lazy as well as incoherent..

Some people just do it better. okay..
From an evolutionary point of view, it makes sense that men would have an interest in things like justice from a theoretical perspective. A man in prehistoric times may have served on a tribal council and have had to come to a fair decision based on objective criteria; a woman dealt mainly with her family and would put feelings over reason. Males would have to form alliances with other tribes, build things to deal with the forces of nature, figure out a practical way to get the mammoth down, etc. Females gossiped and took care of children. They never evolved the mental tools to go beyond the personal. That’s why something that is true but unpopular like race realism will appeal more to men than women. A man (some of us) has the potential to ask “Is this true?” while a woman can’t go beyond “Is this the correct thing to believe for the status of me and my kids?”

I’ve had men and women disagree with my positions on race, but have only seen women refer to my beliefs as “stupid.” This used to puzzle me because they couldn’t articulate a reason why. I eventually came to realize that the connotations that the word has for me are different than the ones it has for females. When I say a belief is “stupid” I mean that there are actual reasons for not believing it. When a woman says a belief is “stupid” she means that it’s not the correct thing to believe if you want to have friends. In that sense race realism can be stupid from a social stand point while also being true. But a woman doesn’t think in terms of what we call truth and doesn’t use it as a barometer to decide what is or isn’t “stupid.”


I and many of my fellow man can relate.

As an example, my ex could never discipline or negatively respond to our children as she felt that she would be hated if she responded negatively towards them ( aka, gave them a serve when they f**ked up) a typical human behaviour as far as I am aware..

She could not understand as I, the disciplinarian, could possibly be loved or have any credibility with my children as I was the one determining the rules of behaviour..

Now I do not need to justify this to those thinking and capable of having conscious thought so I will deny you that distraction..

One does have to ponder the possibility that any mind that deems irrational behaviour an irrelevance must come under question..

I feel in this day and age that it not only is irrelevant but indicates that society will deteriorate as well as wallow in it's own delusions.

Society deteriorating as it wallows in it's own ignorance..

From here..

14.9.09

I don't Know..you decide..

Now a few terms comes to mind..

Drowning at birth..
Euthanasia..
Passport Monitoring..
No Greencard for Europe and Surrounding Areas..

Selective denial..

Man Wins Employment Sex Discrimination Suit ..

Obviously it's fine for a woman to "feel" for not employing someone but imagine the feminist outcry and hypocrisy if a man should even think of that possibility..

Think about this..

Progesterone may also cause 'water retention' in various parts of the body. Your breasts may become slightly bigger or tender, and your abdomen may swell a little before a period. You may feel irritable before a period which is possibly hormone related. To have such symptoms before a period is normal. Sometimes the symptoms prior to periods can be more severe. This is then called 'pre-menstrual syndrome' or 'pre-menstrual tension'
O ain't employing her because she has the potential of being a lunatic..

They really do not want to confess or admit that they are a wreck..
Some are even psychotic or approaching hysteria like you would not believe. This is the time you get the " does my arse look big in this" question and you would do well to head for the nearest bomb shelter..

IT IS VERBOTEN..

http://www.fwhc.org/health/moon.htm
http://kidshealth.org/parent/general/body_basics/female_reproductive_system.html

If your interested. It really is something you need to know about as it does rear it's head EVERY MONTH, remember..

Canadian Man Wins Employment Sex Discrimination Suit

By Glenn Sacks | Sun, Sep 13 2009, 10:15 AM

Four years ago, Ronald Morrison moved to the southern interior of British Columbia to care for his aging father who suffered from dementia. That experience convinced him that he wanted to pursue a career as a caregiver to the elderly. So he enrolled in and completed a course which would permit him to work in that field. He was the only man in a class of seven.

The good news was that there were plenty of jobs for which Morrison was qualified; the bad news was that he couldn't seem to land one. He applied for a job at the extended care wing of the Mountain Lake Seniors Community in Nelson, B.C., but was turned down. That unit was operated by AdvoCare. He later found work in the same facility but in a unit not operated by AdvoCare.

Sure enough, when AdvoCare took over Morrison's unit, he was fired.

Morrison eventually sued AdvoCare for sex discrimination and recently the tribunal hearing his case found in his favor. The hearing officer, Marlene Tyshynski ruled that Morrison had equal or superior qualifications to those of 10 women whom AdvoCare hired during the time it was denying him employment. Tyshynski further found that he was denied employment because he's male and awarded him $12,000 compensation.

There are a couple of interesting things. According to this article, when he applied for the job originally,

the woman who conducted job interviews at Advocare didn't feel comfortable with Morrison, who is a tall and muscular man (CBC, 9/9/09).

What interests me about that is that the woman in charge of hiring for AdvoCare apparently saw nothing wrong with refusing to hire a person based on sex because she "felt uncomfortable." I wonder where she got the idea that sex discrimination in employment is appropriate as long as one feels "uncomfortable." Did she not realize that such a concept, if accepted by courts, would totally abrogate laws against sex discrimination (or any other kind of discrimination for that matter)?

Second, anyone who knows much about elder care knows that a certain amount of strength in a caregiver is a real plus. The fact is, as most nurses know, that the job of moving and turning patients who can't do so themselves, is heavy, difficult work. Not a few nurses are injured doing just that. So a man who is "tall and muscular," should be considered particularly well-qualified, all other things being equal.

So not only did the AdvoCare interviewer discriminate against Morrison, she didn't do existing caregivers any favors either by depriving them of help they may have been unable to find elsewhere.

Thanks to Mike for the heads-up

Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola: Another Male Hating Judge..

Whoa..

A judge does what ?

The case would come as no surprise to Bob Simpson, 48, who got divorced in June 2008. At the time, he said his lawyer advised him to keep his mouth shut because the "judge hates men."
Ah yes, the politically correct female male-hating judge. Is that NEW, F..king NO !!

But there is more..

Even the children caught in their parents' crossfire question why Probate Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola appears to rule against fathers even where experts have found the father to be the better parent under court-established guidelines.
But, but..Women are more "feeling" more in touch with their "humanity" they are the world's imaginary communicators and the only vassal of sympathy, love, empathy..

They alone know children and what is good for them. Just ask any woman, they just know !!

Anyway, dreams and feminist theory aside let's have a look at reality..

Some feel judge has bias against men

By Lisa Roose-Church • DAILY PRESS & ARGUS • September 13, 2009


  • The battle between men and women is old — but in one Livingston County courtroom, men say the judge doesn't give them a fighting chance.
  • Even the children caught in their parents' crossfire question why Probate Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola appears to rule against fathers even where experts have found the father to be the better parent under court-established guidelines.

    "I felt like I wanted to scream, just to get it out of my system," former Howell resident Chloe Basa, 9, said after learning Garagiola ordered her to live in Arkansas with her mother, despite psychologist and attorney reports that said it was in the child's best interest to live with her father.

    The Michigan Court of Appeals eventually found that Garagiola "abused (her) discretion" when she ruled to change Chloe Basa's living arrangements, and that her "reliance on case law was misplaced." The case now returns to Garagiola, who has scheduled a hearing Thursday.

    The case would come as no surprise to Bob Simpson, 48, who got divorced in June 2008. At the time, he said his lawyer advised him to keep his mouth shut because the "judge hates men."

    Simpson, who said there were no claims of domestic violence or wrongdoing from either side in the divorce, said he did not believe his attorney until Garagiola routinely ruled against him even when his ex-wife violated their divorce agreement by relocating out of the county, which was prohibited.

    "I feel screwed," he said. "I'm afraid to go before (Garagiola) because I'm a man. I feel like a Negro ... in 1964 Mississippi. ... I feel like there is prejudice going on here."

    Court rules say Garagiola cannot discuss specific cases with the media, but she did say she stands by her custody decisions.

    "It saddens me to hear that is a perception, but when you deal with domestic violence and take a strong position with it, that is very often the response you get," the judge said. "I don't go in there with predetermined anything. Put the evidence on, and I will apply the law to it."

    Yet, the Michigan Court of Appeals found that Garagiola did not properly apply the law in the Basa case.

    Attorney Kevin Gentry, who represents Andrew Basa, declined to speak about the pending case, but said he relies on his court filings.

    In those court papers, Gentry said Garagiola abused her discretion by ignoring or misinterpreting facts and ignoring court-appointed expert witnesses. He also alleged she denied due process to fathers by not allowing them to put on a defense or cross-examine witnesses.

    Gentry also represents another father who is fighting for his children under similar circumstances to the Basa case. This second case is pending in the Court of Appeals.

    Gentry said there appears to be a question about whether guardian ad litem (GAL) will be used as Garagiola's "rejection of the recommendations of the various GALs and court-appointed experts in a number of cases have recently led to considerable dissension in the local bar," according to court documents filed in the Michigan Court of Appeals.

    A GAL — which is a traditional practice in the family court — is a court-appointed attorney for the children in a custody dispute case.

    Garagiola said that she sometimes disagrees with the court-appointed experts, but she denied ignoring their recommendations.

    "The easiest thing in the world would be just go along with whatever anybody says and don't make waves," she said. "That's not what I was elected to do. People who have had decisions they don't like will argue to the Court of Appeals and anyone who will listen that they were wronged and (my) decisions were wrong.

    "If I'm picking and choosing from testimony and ignoring other testimony ... I'll be reversed as fast as you can open the mail," she added.

    The better parent

    The appeals court said throughout its opinion in the Basa case that Garagiola's analysis and decision goes "against the great weight" of the testimony presented.

    The courts determine the "better" parent based on 12 factors the judge and various court-appointed representatives use to evaluate the parents.

    Those factors include how the parents interact and are bonded with their children; the moral fitness of both parents; their willingness to work with the other; and mental and physical health of both parents, among others.

    The Daily Press & Argus randomly reviewed about three dozen divorce or child-custody cases assigned to Garagiola and learned that, in some of her cases, the judge deemed the father unsuitable to have custody of his children either because of allegations of domestic violence, alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness, lack of financial support, or similar reasons. In these cases, Garagiola granted physical custody to the mother and gave the father visitation.

    Yet in some cases where the mother appears unsuitable due to alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness or other issues, Garagiola still awarded custody to the mother, even when the children's court-appointed attorneys, social worker, psychologists or Friend of the Court determine the mother is the less-desirable parent.

    Garagiola said she cannot talk about the specifics of individual cases.

    "I feel I was labeled by the judge in a negative manner," Andrew Basa said after his son and daughter were taken from him. "Everything was one-sided in (my ex-wife's) favor. In all honesty, I don't think I was given beyond a reasonable doubt in anything or that anything I said was taken to heart."

    Andrew Basa said his ex-wife, Carleen Gautz, had custody of the children and he paid child support, once falling behind when he lost his job due to downsizing, but he caught up. He said his ex-wife gave him custody of their children in 2007 because she was moving to Arkansas to live with her parents because she told him she was about to become homeless.

    Andrew Basa and his current wife, Amy, have a letter that his ex-wife wrote in which she encourages Garagiola to give him custody of Chloe and Karl.

    "The judge would not consider it," he said.

    Carlene Gautz testified at a hearing that she felt she had no choice because it was it either move "or become homeless" due to financial difficulties.

    However, court documents state that Gautz voluntarily left a full-time job with the University of Michigan Brighton Health Center, where she was making $11.66 an hour, to move to Arkansas to be with her parents. About two months after relocating, Gautz found a job paying her $16 an hour.

    Both the judge and Gautz chastised Andrew Basa for frequently changing jobs, Gentry said.

    "In reality, his history reveals that whenever he was laid off from a position, he usually quickly secured a new one and then advanced to full-time status and higher rank," Gentry wrote in court documents.

    The appeals court agreed with Gentry, and said Garagiola erred when the judge "overemphasized (Gautz's) improved life in Arkansas instead of focusing on the benefits to the children from the move."

    "Instead of focusing on defendant's failure and plaintiff's improved financial stability, the trial court should have focused its analysis on whether a $4.34 hourly wage increase and proximity to plaintiff's parents had the capacity to improve the children's lives, even though the move would result in a loss of the continued presence" of their father in their everyday lives, the appeals court opinion stated.

    Gentry said Garagiola found Andrew Basa's living with his father as "unstable," but considered Gautz's living with her parents as "improving her stability." He said the judge found Andrew Basa's layoffs to mean he was "economically unstable," but the judge dismisses Gautz quitting a financially stable job as a necessity.

    Chloe Basa said she told Garagiola that she felt abandoned by her mother, but the judge ignored her feelings.

    Gautz even acknowledged that Chloe felt she had been abandoned by her mother's move, but the judge takes issue with the children's court-appointed attorney as well as their therapist using that same characterization.

    Garagiola dismissed the experts' opinions, saying she found Gautz was "demonstrating responsible and necessary behavior" under the circumstances, according to the judge's August 2008 order granting Gautz permission to relocate her children to Arkansas.

    The judge further notes that she found it "concerning" that Andrew Basa, Amy Basa and none of the professionals involved in the case had helped the children understand their mother's move to Arkansas was anything but abandonment.

    "While 'abandonment' is the children's experience, that is not the reality of the circumstances of mother's move to Arkansas, as the move was motivated by financial necessity," the judge wrote in her opinion.

    However, the appeals court took Garagiola to task, saying her ruling "failed to consider Chloe's feelings of abandonment" by her mother.

    A father's value

    Experts agree that children need their fathers in their lives.

    "Too often, the system looks at the mother and assumes the mother is solely responsible for upkeep," said Debi Cain, executive director of the Michigan Domestic Violence Prevention and Treatment Board. "The bottom line is, for the best interest (of children), it's most advantageous if a caring and active father is in their life as well."

    Cain says that in any courtroom across the state, there is an equal number of women making the same complaint about a judge being prejudiced against her.

    "The reality is, we expect the people who make those recommendations to be experts in everything — alcohol abuse, drug abuse, child abuse and neglect," she said. "We expect them to understand sexual violence in the family. The truth is, in my experience, the reality is that most professionals have very little training (in those) issues. The reality is, the evaluations are only as good as the people who make them."

    When asked why the court system bothers to use GALs to make recommendations, Cain replied: "Whatever they offer is that much more information (for a judge to consider)."

    However, Cain said, the reality is that the judge, attorneys or GALs may not ever get a "complete picture."

    Waiting on answers

    Meanwhile, Andrew Basa continues his fight for his children while trying to enjoy the moments, like Christmas, that he gets with his children.

    He said he is cautious about the appeals court's ruling because the family must still return to Garagiola's courtroom for her revised analysis of his case.

    Amy Basa said the couple is disheartened to learn Chloe and Karl are not receiving the court-ordered counseling on a regular basis and that their mother is mostly absent from their upbringing.

    "Their mom is at school all day Monday through Thursday, so she's really there for them only on Friday and weekends," she said. "Their grandma and grandpa put them to bed and feed them. Their grandma and grandpa are raising them."

    Those factors include how the parents interact and are bonded with their children; the moral fitness of both parents; their willingness to work with the other; and mental and physical health of both parents, among others.

    The Daily Press & Argus randomly reviewed about three dozen divorce or child-custody cases assigned to Garagiola and learned that, in some of her cases, the judge deemed the father unsuitable to have custody of his children either because of allegations of domestic violence, alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness, lack of financial support, or similar reasons. In these cases, Garagiola granted physical custody to the mother and gave the father visitation.

    Yet in some cases where the mother appears unsuitable due to alcohol or substance abuse, mental illness or other issues, Garagiola still awarded custody to the mother, even when the children's court-appointed attorneys, social worker, psychologists or Friend of the Court determine the mother is the less-desirable parent.

    Garagiola said she cannot talk about the specifics of individual cases.

    "I feel I was labeled by the judge in a negative manner," Andrew Basa said after his son and daughter were taken from him. "Everything was one-sided in (my ex-wife's) favor. In all honesty, I don't think I was given beyond a reasonable doubt in anything or that anything I said was taken to heart."

    Andrew Basa said his ex-wife, Carleen Gautz, had custody of the children and he paid child support, once falling behind when he lost his job due to downsizing, but he caught up. He said his ex-wife gave him custody of their children in 2007 because she was moving to Arkansas to live with her parents because she told him she was about to become homeless.

    Andrew Basa and his current wife, Amy, have a letter that his ex-wife wrote in which she encourages Garagiola to give him custody of Chloe and Karl.

    "The judge would not consider it," he said.

    Carlene Gautz testified at a hearing that she felt she had no choice because it was it either move "or become homeless" due to financial difficulties.

    However, court documents state that Gautz voluntarily left a full-time job with the University of Michigan Brighton Health Center, where she was making $11.66 an hour, to move to Arkansas to be with her parents. About two months after relocating, Gautz found a job paying her $16 an hour.

    Both the judge and Gautz chastised Andrew Basa for frequently changing jobs, Gentry said.

    "In reality, his history reveals that whenever he was laid off from a position, he usually quickly secured a new one and then advanced to full-time status and higher rank," Gentry wrote in court documents.

    The appeals court agreed with Gentry, and said Garagiola erred when the judge "overemphasized (Gautz's) improved life in Arkansas instead of focusing on the benefits to the children from the move."

    "Instead of focusing on defendant's failure and plaintiff's improved financial stability, the trial court should have focused its analysis on whether a $4.34 hourly wage increase and proximity to plaintiff's parents had the capacity to improve the children's lives, even though the move would result in a loss of the continued presence" of their father in their everyday lives, the appeals court opinion stated.

    Gentry said Garagiola found Andrew Basa's living with his father as "unstable," but considered Gautz's living with her parents as "improving her stability." He said the judge found Andrew Basa's layoffs to mean he was "economically unstable," but the judge dismisses Gautz quitting a financially stable job as a necessity.

    Chloe Basa said she told Garagiola that she felt abandoned by her mother, but the judge ignored her feelings.

    Gautz even acknowledged that Chloe felt she had been abandoned by her mother's move, but the judge takes issue with the children's court-appointed attorney as well as their therapist using that same characterization.

    Garagiola dismissed the experts' opinions, saying she found Gautz was "demonstrating responsible and necessary behavior" under the circumstances, according to the judge's August 2008 order granting Gautz permission to relocate her children to Arkansas.

    The judge further notes that she found it "concerning" that Andrew Basa, Amy Basa and none of the professionals involved in the case had helped the children understand their mother's move to Arkansas was anything but abandonment.

    Advertisement

    "While 'abandonment' is the children's experience, that is not the reality of the circumstances of mother's move to Arkansas, as the move was motivated by financial necessity," the judge wrote in her opinion.

    However, the appeals court took Garagiola to task, saying her ruling "failed to consider Chloe's feelings of abandonment" by her mother.



    Contact Daily Press & Argus reporter Lisa Roose-Church at (517) 552-2846 or at lrchurch@gannett.com.



    WANT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO A MAN WHO IS FALSELY ACCUSED OF RAPE?..

    Now bear in mind the famous words of this male hating feminist promoting her feminist doctrine as well as their hopeful outcome..

    ""Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." - Catherine Comins"

    Here is a link to that male-hating feminazy..

    What a charming human being these women have become..

    IMPORTANT POST: WANT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO A MAN WHO IS FALSELY ACCUSED OF RAPE? THIS IS TYPICAL

    By False Rape Society | Sun, Sep 13 2009, 05:00 PM

    An innocent man spent two months in jail after the mother of his daughter falsely accused him of rape. They had had consensual sex, but was angry at him, so not only did she lie to police about the rape, for good measure she added that he was armed and dangerous. So 12-15 police cars came for him. He was humiliated. Two of the arresting deputies were people he knew from school. He faced 25 years to life for a crime he didn't commit and finally raised $25,000 for his bail. The false accuser finally recanted, but not before his life was ruined. His false arrest cost him countless jobs and $40,000 in legal fees. And he still must pay $460 per month on his bail (and likely child support, to the false accuser).

    This man is typical of countless false rape victims. Yet the people who control the public discourse about rape insist false rape claims are a "myth." When they grudgingly concede that a small number of false claims are committed, they insist the real harm is to hypothetical future rape victims. In fact, they are wrong every step of the way. False rape claims are common, and their most significant victims are the innocent men like this, whose lives have been ruined by a vile lie. Read this one carefully.

    Accuser recants, but stigma of rape charges remains

    By Kate Leckie News-Post Staff

    Thomas Charles Bender spent two months in the Frederick County Adult Detention Center when the mother of his child accused him of rape. She later recanted, allowing him to have the charges expunged from his record. At left is his new fiancée, Sandra Crawford.

    Thomas Charles Bender is a mason by trade.

    Until nine months ago, his only brush with the law was for a pair of hunting infractions, including failure to wear a fluorescent orange vest.

    Bender's life took a nightmarish turn Jan. 3, when his former fiancée told police he'd raped her.

    Driving down Bethel Road, Bender found himself surrounded by 12 to 15 police cars at the intersection of Fox Road.

    He later learned his accuser told deputies to consider him armed and dangerous.

    "They don't take that too lightly, I found," Bender said Friday as he discussed his struggle to put his life back together since he has had his record cleared.

    Bender, 29, spent eight weeks in jail before he was able to raise $25,000, the 10 percent of his $250,000 bail needed to be released.

    Then on March 16, his accuser, Samantha Carter-drabczyk, contacted the Frederick County State's Attorney's Office and asked to discuss the case, according to court documents.

    She recanted her rape allegations during a meeting that same day with four criminal justice authorities involved in the case: Assistant State's Attorney Lindell K. Angel; Rebecca Littleton, a victim-witness coordinator; Cpl. Jason West, a sheriff's office detective; and Wayne Moffatt, a state's attorney investigator.

    According to court documents, Carter-drabczyk told the group she had been angry at Bender when she made the allegations in January. She told them the two had argued and then had consensual sex.

    Moffatt asked Carter-drabczyk if she was coming forward to see justice done, according to the documents.

    "Yes. For him," Carter-drabczyk told Moffatt. "He was falsely accused," deputies quoted her as saying in documents seeking charges against her.

    During the meeting, Moffatt reminded Carter-drabczyk that Bender had been incarcerated awaiting trial because of three statements she made to separate police officers. Taking back her previous statements constituted the false report of a crime.

    Carter-drabczyk told Moffatt she would face the consequences, according to the documents.

    Now the 29-year-old Thurmont woman is awaiting trial on criminal charges herself: three counts of making a false statement to police, a crime punishable by up to six months in jail and a $500 fine for each conviction.

    A pretrial conference is set for Sept. 25 in Frederick County Circuit Court.

    On Thursday, Carter-drabczyk's lawyer, Assistant Public Defender Matthew J. Frawley, declined to comment on the case.

    Thursday evening, Carter-drabczyk changed her story again, two weeks before her next court appearance.

    "I'm not sorry I took it (the allegations) back," Carter-drabczyk said of her March 16 meeting with criminal justice authorities.

    "I did it so my daughter's father wouldn't go to prison and serve 25 years to life," she said.

    On Friday, when told of Carter-drabczyk's latest about-face, Bender laughed.

    "I think it's pretty obvious that with all the thousands of dollars and all the time police had invested in this case, that if the evidence was there, the state would have picked up the charges against me," Bender said.

    For Bender, recovering his life as he knew it before his arrest has been slow.

    "It's so frustrating," he said. "I didn't do anything wrong."

    On June 16, Bender received a notarized letter from criminal justice authorities telling him the criminal charges against him had been expunged from court records.

    When criminal charges against a defendant are expunged, prosecutors and police must destroy all documents related to the case. They cannot even acknowledge the previous existence of a case.

    Still, Bender said his arrest has cost him countless jobs and at least $40,000 in legal fees.

    Even though his record has been cleared, he's still required to pay about $460 a month on his bail.

    The stigma from the allegations has left him humiliated.

    Two of the deputies at his arrest were people he knew from attending Thurmont -area schools.

    While held on charges of first-degree rape, second-degree assault and false imprisonment, Bender was kept in a cell block with men accused of robbery and attempted murder.

    Bender said he plans to file a lawsuit against Carter-drabczyk to recover his financial losses related to the criminal charges.

    He's also pursuing custody of their 4-year-old daughter.

    Wednesday evening was the first time he'd been allowed to see the child in about a month, he said.

    It was their daughter's birthday.

    "It was absolutely great," Bender said. "I took her an ice cream cake and lots of nice presents. She loved them. Her Barbie laptop computer was her favorite."

    Because Bender was successful in having his record expunged of the rape charges, Maryland court records now show no record of the January allegations against him.

    But for Bender, that doesn't go far enough.

    "She's ruined my life, but I'm not here to trash her," he said of Carter-drabczyk.

    "I've been cleared of the charges, and the public needs to know that. I need to get on with my life."

    Link: http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?StoryID=95149