27.10.09

BBC lying about Domestic Violence..

Link to Audio..

This is a short audio file taken from a BBC Radio program that looked into one of the most popular statistics on domestic abuse and found them utterly false. This statistic, like many, many others from the feminist run abuse industry is adopted by governments, the media and many other organisations WITHOUT being checked. Consequently, it has gone around the world and been adopted as truth. In this audio we are asked to believe that an entire news organisation, from the presenters in the studio, to all of the research staff, the people working on the sound, cameras and in the control room (most of which are Univercity educated) all failed to a man and woman to notice the difference between the words, "morbidity (illness) and mortality (death) in the report that led to the announcement that the leading cause of death among women is domestic violence. This strains credibility to breaking point and raises the question, "Have we been lied too with the help and collusion of the media?" The answer is, "YES! We have." These lies have to stop! We cannot defeat abuse in the home by lying about the evidence. Under the term of fair use, this file is supplied for educational reasons. 

Times and Home Office Spin "Girls in Crime" story..

Here we have the usual "women are victims" story by the "Times" in England, another media that has no problems smearing men but goes out of it's way allowing journalists to ensure that every action by females are always seen to be unaccountable..

You have to bear in mind that women do nuffin wrong, they are armless. Unfortunately stats. demonstrate the direct opposite. Did I not blog that female violence increased by 252% ?

So how does that make females, victims ?. Maybe I still need to learn something ?

But just note the story making the girls out to be victims..
Where is the accountability and where is the "It's your own fault for making a stupid decision" come into it ?

Oh Look, the name of the sycophant..

Adam Fresco, Crime Correspondent


And it get's better, no, really..

The problem is growing at such a rate that the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police helped to fund a conference of different agencies earlier this month to discuss the issue.
We are going to get real results NOW, The Home Office is involved..
(A bit like sending a child to assess an adult..)

But..

25 females aged between 14 and 39 were arrested in connection with assaults, drug offences and carrying weapons.

What happened to the girls. You mean that girls are now aged 39 ?

That's not all. We need the angst level and the tissue sample, the emotive angle and bingo I found it..

We are seeing more elements of violence from girls within gangs.
Pass the tissues..
Girls accept gun running and rape as price of joining violent male gangs
Weapons carried by girls

Police are finding weapons being carried by young girls for gang members

Teenage girls wanting to join violent male gangs are being forced into having sex and ferrying guns, knives and drugs, police and charities have found.
The girls, some as young as 13, want to join gangs to raise their own profile or to seek protection. Often they are swayed by the status given to the senior members of the gang.
When they first join they are told they must have sex with one member of the gang — and then find several of the gang waiting for them.
What has shocked welfare workers is that the girls accept the situation as normal and do not appreciate that they are being violated.
The girls are also being asked to store and transport guns, knives and drugs for the male members of the gang and police have evidence that girls are taking guns direct to killers and then disposing of the weapons once someone has been shot.
The problem has been growing over the past couple of years, with charities getting ever more girls coming to them with tales of gang rapes, and yet reluctant to press charges.
Teresa Pointing, chief executive of In-volve, a charity helping young people drawn into violent situations, said: “These girls have no rights within these gangs, which are primitive in the way they operate.”
“The girls think they are going to be protected by the gang if they have sex with one person but then they find there are more boys there.”
The problem is growing at such a rate that the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police helped to fund a conference of different agencies earlier this month to discuss the issue. There is another meeting planned this week between the Metropolitan Police, the Home Office and the Greater London Authority to discuss how to deal with the matter.
But workers on the front line accuse the Government of not giving them enough funding.
So far this year, more girls have been caught carrying guns than in the whole of last year, with weapons including MAC10 machine-pistols. The weapons are capable of firing 1,000 rounds a minute and are known as “room-clearers”. In a recent raid by police targeting violent youth crime, 25 females aged between 14 and 39 were arrested in connection with assaults, drug offences and carrying weapons.
Superintendent David Chinchen, who deals with youth violence, said: “Young women are being dragged into the fringes of male criminality and gangs. We are seeing more elements of violence from girls within gangs.” He also said that officers had seen signs of girls becoming involved in sexual violence. Plans are under way to increase home visits to the parents of girls who officials believe are becoming involved in gangs and serious violence.
Dr Pointing added: “These girls are very much second-class citizens within the gangs but they see it as normal. That’s the bit that is most disturbing.”

Link..

Yahoo Answers: Feminists loosing it..

I must confess to bandying about on Yahoo Answers even though on the odd occassion I have my questions deleted due to feminist constraint and political correctness that Yahoo adheres to. I see many questions that seems reasonable deleted because of it..

Here is a particular discussion and answers..

This is about the typical question asked by the usual fembots totally ignorant of fact and wallowing in their fiction..

The fascinating thing is that the anti-feminist responses exceed the "feminist" lacky response and the other thing is that just as many women are involved as well..

It gladdens the heart..

Why do so many anti-feminists ignore all the injustice against women in the world?

*sigh* Okay so I thought I would start the day with this...lol

For the record I have never met any person in real life who is an anti-feminist. This is mainly for you Yahoo answerers :]

Why is it that any time someone bbrings up a valid point about the way women throughout the world are treated by men on a daily basis and patriarchy, anti-feminists show no compassion what so ever. Now, I usually just laugh it off and chalk it up to ignorance but no it goes deeper than that. When we talk about women being abused, raped, or degraded they don't even mention anything about it in their answers,I have noticed. They will just answer with the cliche "What about all of the misandry?" They have no concern for these women at all. I guess for me it's frustrating because I am a feminist and I volunteer at a battered women's shelter and a center for women who are raped and abused. I would just be crushed if some crazy as* Yahoo answerer came in there screaming in their faces some of the things I hear on this website: "You brought it on yourself!" "What did you do to the MEN to deserve this?!" "Women do just as much stuff to men so it's no big deal - Where's the men's center, huh?!"

It's like where do people come from and how are you raised that because there might be issues with men, you ignore the fact that women are overwhelmingly the victims of abuse. There is no debate here. Anyone who suggests that women have not been the ones who have to fight for their rights or that women are the ones who are abused and raped WAY more often is a very sad person. I just have a hard time accepting that people are so callous. Not to mention when women are antifeminists...it's like a black person running a minstrel show in the 1920s. Sad and heartbreaking.

Is it that they have to ignore all the evidence proving that women are more often the victims than men are or is it that they just don't care?

Responses..
Feminists have a left leaning liberal political agenda...has very little to do with women's rights.......remember how they ridiculed the women Clinton abused and where were they when SNL insinuated that Bristol Palin was pregnant by her father?

Gotta be liberal to be a feminist........I would think that they would be 100% behind a war that seeks to destroy a force that beheads women in soccer stadiums because they did not wear the correct clothes...they are liars.

y r women still talking about how women hav it so bad. there is plenty more man on man violence then man on woman violence. women hav just as much oppurtunity as men nowadays and in some circumstances more, due to gender quota. i am not ignoring the violence, it is there, but look at it as a whole.

Anti-feminists don't ignore injustice against anyone. They just want ALL injustices to be addressed and not just the injustices that some women experience. For example it's a fact that children experience abuse from women more often than from men. It's just as important to address that as it is to address men's violence against women. Even so I don't think it's helpful to make a child abuse campaign into a campaign against women. I think we'll make progress when we can all work together on abuse issues and resist the temptation to elevate the victimhood experienced by some people above others.

Why do so many feminists ignore all the injustice against women in the world?

Men don't typically have centers because they are not so quick to label every little thing as abuse. An argument happens, voices get raised, and they shrug it off and chalk it up to "experience" or "a bad day"... they don't call it "verbal and emotional abuse" and have every one jumping out of the woodwork to help them liberate themselves.
All in all,, I think that men do care when a woman is abused, but the bar for abuse has been allowed to be set so low, that almost everything can be classified as abuse now. The hardening of the heart is a knee-jerk reaction. I am a woman, and I have it myself.
Source(s):
an equalist, not an anti-feminist
.

And what have feminists done in the other parts of the world? They have done little for anyone but white american women. MRA's don't deny the horrible things that were done and are being done to women elsewhere in the world, they simply try to make it known that men don't have it much better.

Overwhelmingly the victim of abuse? I don't think so, please provide examples besides the middle east. Women are usually rape victims, but men have much much higher murder rates? Would you like to trade? What about higher jail sentences for men in the us? Even for the same crime and criminal history? How callous are you to ignore that blatant sexism?

Anyways, you are a typical feminist. All you care about is how it affects women, and refuse to see that men don't have it much better.

I think it's because in the two....nearly 3 now....years I've been here, I have hardly seen any questions from feminists addressing the violence and oppression faced by so many men in the world. When it comes to men's issues and male victimhood, feminists are largely silent. I guess these anti-feminists have noticed the same thing and are even more tired of it than I am. Yes, there are women who are suffering horribly out there. Yes, there is a lot of injustice. But guess what? Men are too! Why do women get compassion and aid from the feminist camp, but men get left out in the cold? Why can't you try to help BOTH at the same time?


"Anyone who suggests that women have not been the ones who have to fight for their rights or that women are the ones who are abused and raped WAY more often is a very sad person."

I suggest you pick up a real history book, not one from a women's studies course, and get reacquainted with the way things were. Men, historically, didn't have a ton of rights either. In many countries, the men with rights were those with wealth or nobility, while the common men were abused and enslaved and had little to no rights to speak of. Men have had to fight for their rights too. Do you think history is some big Boys' Club, where all men everywhere could vote, get an education, do as they pleased....? I hope not.

Tired old feminist rehash, so boring..

Got to love it when feminists continue to make their irrelevant claims when EVERYONE is already aware that women are the "preferred" human and everyone else is just baggage..

Have a look at the sexist biased claims those sycophants still demands. Yea, I know, I am laughing too..

New ideas include: micro-credit loans of small amounts of money to female entrepreneurs; the re-establishment of a national literacy secretariat; a toll-free national line for women suffering abuse; and a gender equity commissioner.
We already know what a "gender Equatist"( I just made that up) is and it ain't about equality..
Not only are women succeeding in wages above men, Universities are given women free rides, governments are solely dedicated to anything "WOMAN" but they have the temerity to suggest that the privileged sex is not privileged enough..


I would really like to get one of those jobs at over $ 100,000 per year and just reprint something I did 5 years ago and submit it as being "today"..

What a laugh. Are these feminists for real or are they just stuck in a timewarp. They really need to get real but maybe that would require conscience thought.

I was so impressed by this article that I sent the lovely lady a thank you email, might want to do the same..
She is one of us..
bkay@videotron.ca

The problem with the Pink Book

Barbara Kay, National Post  Published: Friday, October 23, 2009

 

Chris Wattie, 
Reuters
 
The Liberal Women's Caucus has released their 40-page Pink Book, Volume III.

Clearly a great deal of midnight oil was consumed by the Pink Book writers in agonizing about what Canadian women really want from their government. Keen political social observers nearly fell over in shock at the caucus's revolutionary recommendation that Canadian women deserve a "compassionate Canada" where women can achieve "economic and social equality."

Throwing caution to the wind, Michael Ignatieff unequivocally endorsed the heady challenge, bravely announcing that the Pink Book is "a clear statement of principle that we want a Canada that provides a strong, secure future for all Canadians."

The above is sarcasm, in case you were in doubt. The recommendations aren't revolutionary. They're the same old demands we got in 2006, the first edition, and 2007: more help for caregiving for children and the aged, tasks that fall disproportionately to women and a national daycare program.
New ideas include: micro-credit loans of small amounts of money to female entrepreneurs; the re-establishment of a national literacy secretariat; a toll-free national line for women suffering abuse; and a gender equity commissioner.

Starting with the new recommendations: Why do women wishing to start enterprises deserve government-backed credit more than men? Women are as well educated as men in this country, and since they make something like 70% of household purchases, are far better placed to tap into networks and targeted markets than men. Let them get their loans the usual way; if their idea is good, they'll get the loan. If it's bad, why fund hobbies?

As for the toll-free line for abuse, that's a swell idea; how about we make it gender-free? Memo to Women's Caucus: Men suffer abuse from women, nearly as much as the other way around, and there are virtually no resources in this country for even severely abused men. So why should a national toll-free line serve only one gender?

Literacy? This is a women's issue? How so?
As for a gender commissioner, if the Women's Caucus really wants to go there, they might start by recommending the abolition of equity programs in university. Enrolment in most programs is so female-skewed, an outsider might think men have fallen victim to some mysterious plague. And given the dropout rates of boys, one might call it a plague, because gender-wise the education system is sick. Boys are disadvantaged K-12, with teaching methods geared for girls and a very poor understanding of how boys learn best. Just this week Toronto proposed sweeping changes to education to make up for years of apathy toward the eroding performance gap.

Maybe this putative gender commissioner could ask why Ontario health units only screen for abuse in incoming female patients 12 and older, not male patients, even though male adolescents suffer nearly as much sexual abuse as girls.
And how about a thorough investigation of the family court system, where almost 90% of contested custody cases end up with sole custody going to mothers? How about support for equal parenting, a long-overdue gender-fair initiative that can't get traction because groups like the Liberal Women's Caucus aren't interested in gender fairness?.
Because when the Women's Caucus says "gender" they mean "women's interests." If an honest gender commissioner were ever appointed, he or she would recommend the complete dismantlement of all women's government-funded lobby groups.

There isn't a single body of women in Canada that receives federal or provincial funding that is not ideology-driven, and that includes the Liberal Women's Caucus. The Pink Book III is rife with debunked statistics -for example, that old chestnut about women earning 70% of what men make; we know that figure mainly reflects self-selection out of areas of higher personal demand so that women can spend more time with their children.
As for caregiving: Yes, women do more caregiving for those they love and in whose well-being they are highly invested. There is personal reward in the sacrifice. And men do more fighting and dying in Afghanistan and saving people in burning buildings, but somehow we don't hear so much about those crummy jobs whose only reward is honour fulfilled and pride in supporting one's family.

It's almost as if men and women were, you know, different, each with their own strengths and weaknesses and advantages.
Now that is a shocking idea. Of course, to admit it would be a truly revolutionary act, and somehow I don't think we can expect Michael Ignatieff to be supporting those home truths any time soon.
bkay@videotron.ca


26.10.09

Humour ?

Oh look ! Feminist humour !




This would protect you better than a condom..


And ofcourse the adequate explanation of the male-hating feminist. No wonder she's really pissed..

UK Investigation Can't Find 1 Person Who Forced Anybody into Prostitution..

This is what happens when you have feminists in charge of anything..

Lies, distortion, dis-information and more lies..

Harman hopefully will be shafted at the next election if the English public demonstrate any sanity. But this is a major example on how the Home Office, Media Hysterics, Political Correctness and just mass stupidity as well as feminist doctrine dictates policy and government action.

How much effort and time was wasted here pursuing a non existent crime ?

How many people had to suffer because they were too busy chasing ghosts..

Where is the sanity and where is the media that once prided itself on duty, truth and the pursuit of honesty ?

Journalist only need to read their "allow" list to qualify..

After Big Hype, Huge UK Investigation Can't Find 1 Person Who Forced Anybody into Prostitution

October 25th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq

."The Home Office estimates that there are between 6,000 and 18,000 trafficked women and girls being forced to work as prostitutes in the UK."
That was the news in the United Kingdom as of July, 2008 (Telegraph, 7/2/08).  Every single police force in the country plus those of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, as well as the UK Border Agency, the Serious and Organised Crime Agency, the Foreign Office, the Northern Ireland Office, the Scottish Government, the Crown Prosecution Service and "various NGOs," had just completed "the largest ever police crackdown on human trafficking."
That was how the government and the media described Operation Pentameter Two.  Home Secretary Jacqui Smith,
hailed it as "a great success". Its operational head, Tim Brain, said it had seriously disrupted organised crime networks responsible for human trafficking. "The figures show how successful we have been in achieving our goals," he said.
So, by July of 2008, human trafficking for the sex trade had been dealt a serious blow by the combined efforts of law enforcement throughout the British Isles.
Except there wasn't any sex trafficking, or so little as to be unnoticeable.  It turns out that all the self-congratulation was based on next to nothing.  Here's the altogether different news today (The Guardian, 10/20/09).
The UK's biggest ever investigation of sex trafficking failed to find a single person who had forced anybody into prostitution in spite of hundreds of raids on sex workers in a six-month campaign by government departments, specialist agencies and every police force in the country.
And it's not like the British Government coughed up this information voluntarily.  It took many months for The Guardian to obtain documents that finally revealed the dirty little secret behind sex trafficking in Britain - there's not any.  Or at least if there is, this massive effort failed to uncover it.
And various interested parties were happy for that to remain a secret because it didn't fit the narrative of the sexual exploitation of women and girls that so many have so patiently constructed over many years.  As the article says,
Current and former ministers have claimed that thousands of women have been imported into the UK and forced to work as sex slaves, but most of these statements were either based on distortions of quoted sources or fabrications without any source at all.
Here are the figures from Operation Pentameter Two:
  • Government and media outlets reported 528 arrests, but actually there were only 422;
  • Of those 422, 153 were released almost immediately, 106 with no charge at all and 47 with only cautions for minor offenses;
  • Of the remaining 253, only 67 were ever charged with trafficking and only 22 of those were tried.  Seven were acquitted outright, leaving a grand total of 15 who were actually convicted of something;
But even that overstates the "human sex trafficking" situation in the U.K.  That's because the law under which they were arrested and charged doesn't require for conviction a finding that a person have been compelled or coerced to work as a prostitute against her will.
In the end, a total of five people were found to have actually compelled or coerced a woman into prostitution.  And those five weren't arrested by Operation Pentameter Two.
Needless to say, five is five too many.  But let's be clear about the extent of the problem of sex trafficking in the British Isles when such a massive law enforcement operation nets a grand total of zero sex traffickers.
In summary, government, media, NGOs, etc. built up the problem of human trafficking for sex into an enormous problem.  That was fairly easy to do, given that their effort came against a backdrop of decades of routinely inflated figures on rape and other violence against women.  The fictional narrative held (and holds) that women are in constant danger from men and that, as likely as not, it is men's sex drive that is responsible.  Male sexuality, so the story goes, is unhealthy and perilous for women and girls.
Therefore, the "distortions of quoted sources or fabrications without any source at all" were just another chapter in a lurid novel of male sexual predation of women.  And who wanted to interrupt a juicy story with quibbles about what is and isn't true.  So who could argue with it?  Who would even think to question it?  It was all so obvious, all so neat.
And all so wrong.
Thanks to John for the heads-up.
Link..

Women without children should be allowed maternity leave..

Let us ponder this for a minute so we can not only gaze in astonishment, look up at the ceiling, laugh, wonder and rebuild our perception on the blatant disregard women have regarding "work"..

That is if this survey has merit. Have doubts..

Now we already know the privileged princesses can sail through University as it's set up for them to "not fail" we already know that most females just have a gratuities degree that has really taught them nothing, we already know that employers are "FORCED" to employ them and we have read about the fact that even their own kind do not want to employ them as they are really only interested in banging out ankle biters just to take a year "Paid" holiday, but here we have another revelation..

WOW..

Do these women actually know what the term "WORK" actually means..

Another feminist incentive designed to demonstrate the total and complete shallow attitude of the female sex. Why would they do that if it is not to demonstrate how unworthy they really are of employment..

Good old feminism never missus an opportunity to ensure that all are really denigrated and they don't realise that every one is getting really pissed off..

Women without children should be allowed maternity leave, survey says

Women who do not have children should be allowed to take maternity leave, allowing them time off from the workplace, according to a study.



It found that 74 per cent of women would be in favour of being allowed to take a six-month break, or even longer, as mothers are allowed to do when they give birth. More than two-thirds of those in favour were mothers themselves.
The idea of forcing employers to offer time off to women, not just mothers, came a day after one of Britain's most senior businesswomen, Nicola Pease, said excessive maternity leave and high sex discrimination payouts could backfire against women.
The deputy chairman of JO Hambro, a fund management company, said: "What I really worry about actually is that legislation and protection is turning this into a nightmare.
"I think we have got too long maternity leave," she told a Parliamentary select committee.
The survey results were met with alarm by business groups who said that it would be very difficult for many employers if they were forced to offer leave, even if unpaid.
Corin Taylor, Senior Policy Adviser at the Institute of Directors, said: “This is a nonsensical idea in the best of times. But in the deepest post-war recession, granting rights to women without children would be foolish.”
Phil McCabe of the Forum of Private Business said: "Many employers would love to offer their staff more flexibility, but it is just not practical for most companies, especially small ones. It's a case of all hands to the pump right now."
However, others argued that the recession was the perfect opportunity for companies to offer leave as an alternative to a pay rise.
Sam Baker, the editor-in-chief of Red Magazine, which commissioned the survey of 2,000 women, said: "I think a lot of women who have worked for their employer for ten, or 15 years look around at their colleagues taking maternity leave and feel some element of envy and think, 'What would I do with that time away from the workplace?'.
"This isn't a working mum versus working non-mums argument. Nobody thinks maternity leave is a holiday. Employers, especially now, need to incentivise their staff in imaginative ways and that could involve offering leave. Some companies are already doing this."
Earlier this year BT offered its staff the right to take a year off, in return for taking a 75 per cent pay cut – one of many initiatives by companies to cut their costs, without axing their staff.
Official figures out this week indicated that there 975,000 workers in Britain who are being force to work part time because they cannot find a full-time job, one of the reasons why the total unemployment figure of 2.47 million has not risen as high as many economists had expected.
Statutory maternity leave has become increasingly generous over the last decade. Mothers are now entitled to a full year off work with 39 weeks of paid leave.
Fiona Jennings, a senior employee with a high-street retailing chain, is 37 and does not have children, was one of the women who took part in the survey. “I made a conscious decision not to have children and that was the right decision for me. My career has always been as important as my home life. At 37, I knew that I would benefit hugely from taking a period of time away. My employers agreed to give me seven months off as an unpaid sabbatical. I leave for my round the world backpacking trip in three weeks.”

Link..

Australian Misandry: A New Blog focussed on Australia Today..

Australian Misandry is a new blog I have created by request as we as MRA's continue our growth and expansion against the feminist plague that is determined to segragat men and women and destroy a working relationship that men and women have had for eons..

AM will concentrate on Australian Issues that inflict our society today as it buckles under feminist misandry and it's usual cowardice and hypocrisy.

My introduction explains some part of it's ideals and future and I do hope that you will enjoy it and learn a bit more about this great Nation..

Cheers..

25.10.09

Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice..

Link to Dads on the Air containing an interview with Barbara C. Johnston on her book "Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice" discussing the lunacy that Judges bring to the Family Courts and their bias and contempt for the general public..

Her site is here..False Allegations.

Her book is available on Amazon.com if you're interested..

Australia: Federal Minister for Men's Health..

Herald Sun (Melbourne, Australia) - Monday, October 5, 2009
Author: ALAN HOWE

I CAN exclusively reveal this morning that, in a first for an Australian government, Northern Territory MP Warren Snowdon will be appointed Federal Minister for Men's Health.

Link..



We finally got some equality, finally applied enough pressure on the feminists of which Gillard is one, to stop the blatant sexism in health issues as Australia's Health System is solely focused on women..


I do have several issues on the "blokes" appointed but it is a start and a welcome one. Hopefully this will be taken seriously and not be allowed to pander to the male population like other programs have in a very obtuse and patronizing way as they have already clearly demonstrated..


Appointees..


Ambassadors include Victorian Governor David De Kretser, Professor John McDonald, Olympic diver Matthew Mitcham and Tim Mathieson.


Matheison is one I have a problem with as he is Gillard's boyfriend and it's smacks of some seedy arrangement that only Gillard can justify..


Tim and feminist Gillard..

Here are some articles about that typical political appointment..

Link One..
Link Two..

Gillard has deliberately ignored major and experienced men associated with Men's Issues as well as Men's Health. Appointing only socialists and party apparatchiks much to the detriment of this up and coming Federal Minister for Men's Health.


But I will just wait and see how it all spans out and you can be certain that the ire of the MRA's will be rampant if this Office is hampered or downplayed in way, shape or form..

24.10.09

The Feminisation: Drink the Water..

Gee, like it's some revelation. I don't know about you but I have been hearing this crap since I had my first beer..

And, what have they done about it..NOTHING..

So now we are supposedly to react like it's a surprise.. Well happy birthday to you too..

 Amazing..

But..

It is a good example on how the current population is starting to pare out..

Cannot say that there are too many startling models of masculinity about as all I see, "boys" and "wimps" abound, determined to look and assimilate women..

It is truly sickening to witness,  once a proud and dignified human entity, turned to irrelevance. Everybody will eventually pay for this, it's just a matter of how much..

The opposite sex must be really proud..

Nothing like good old male bashing to get another story across to the populace to propagate the feminist theory..

What this story espouses is another view of what is happening to males on this planet, but very few can delight in it's outcome..

We do drink the water..

Male bass in many US rivers feminized by birth control pills and hormone treatments, study finds

WASHINGTON — Government scientists figure that one out of five male black bass in American river basins have egg cells growing inside their sexual organs, a sign of how widespread fish feminizing has become.

The findings come from the U.S. Geological Survey in its first comprehensive examination of intersex fish in America, a problem linked to women's birth control pills and other hormone treatments that seep into rivers. Sporadic reports of feminized fish have been reported for a few years.

The agency looked at past data from nine river basins — covering about two-thirds of the country — and found that about 6 percent of the nearly 1,500 male fish had a bit of female in them. The study looked at 16 different species, with most not affected.

But the fish most feminized are two of the most sought-after freshwater sportfish: the largemouth and smallmouth, which are part of the black bass family. Those two species were also the most examined with nearly 500 black bass tallied.

"It's widespread," said USGS biologist Jo Ellen Hinck. She is the lead author of the study, published online this month in Aquatic Toxicology. She said 44 percent of the sites where black bass were tested had at least one male with egg cells growing inside.

Past studies have linked the problem to endocrine-disrupting hormones, such as estrogen from women's medicines. While the fish can still reproduce, studies have shown they don't reproduce as well, Hinck said.

Intersex fish are also seen as a general warning about what some experts see as a wider problem of endocrine disruptors in the environment.

The egg cells growing in the male fish's gonads can only be seen with a microscope after the fish has been caught and dissected.

The study used data from 1995 to 2004, when the government stopped funding the research. The only river basin examined that didn't show any problems was Alaska's Yukon River Basin.

The Southeast, especially the Pee Dee River Basin in North and South Carolina, had the highest rates of feminization. In Bucksport, S.C., 10 of 11 largemouth bass examined were intersex. In parts of the Mississippi River in Minnesota and the Yampa River in Colorado, 70 percent of the smallmouth bass had female signs.

Hinck said black bass seem to be more prone to the problem, but researchers don't know why. She also found one common carp that was female with bits of male testes growing inside.

link.

Woman's false rape claim costs her $7,000..Hooray !!!

As changes are made to this blog via Blogger dot com I will have to italicise my comment as they have f..k.d upped the quote system for some reason only they can explain it and try and get some response !!..

If they don't erase you there is some other reason..

Anyway..

Where do I start..

Another female claiming another fake rape claim and this is becoming boring or what..

Let's have a look at this discontent's rantings..

My first impression was that this female was just not happy getting whatever she was involved in. You know the "eighty percent of women chasing after twenty percent of the guys"..

So what next..


Ms Clarke said: "The defendant stated that she had rough sex with her ex-boyfriend that night and that the sex was rougher than normal.

Like that's not something she wanted..

I am into rough sex, but now what ?


"Her ex-boyfriend had punched her on the right side of her face during the sex, leaving a bruise. She stated that she did not know how she was going to explain this bruise to her current boyfriend and decided to report that she had been sexually assaulted to cover up the bruises.


I really enjoyed that honey, but I have to tell the cops..

Woman's false rape claim costs her $7,000

A woman who sparked a $6,000 police investigation after pretending she was raped in her home by two masked intruders was ordered to pay the full cost of the inquiry yesterday.

Michelle Lee Carreiro, of Cut Road, St. George's, appeared at Magistrates' Court where she pleaded guilty to wilfully and knowingly making the false report to Police last week.

Senior Magistrate Archibald Warner told her she could have been jailed for six months but instead he fined her $1,000 plus $6,000 reparation to Bermuda Police Service.

The 22-year-old gave detectives a 19-page statement about the fabricated October 15 attack but on Wednesday she admitted to officers at Southside Police Station that she made up the whole thing.

Acting Senior Crown Counsel Cindy Clarke said Carreiro's lie was aimed at covering up a sexual relationship she was having with her ex-boyfriend from her present partner.

Ms Clarke said: "The defendant stated that she had rough sex with her ex-boyfriend that night and that the sex was rougher than normal.

"Her ex-boyfriend had punched her on the right side of her face during the sex, leaving a bruise. She stated that she did not know how she was going to explain this bruise to her current boyfriend and decided to report that she had been sexually assaulted to cover up the bruises.

"The defendant further stated that she did not think that the Police investigation would progress so fast and that she was sorry for making a false report to the Police."

Seven officers were deployed to investigate Carreiro's complaint, putting more than 100 Police manpower hours into the case.

She told them that at about 8.45 p.m. on October 15 she went to get her cell phone out of her car and was attacked from behind by two masked men. They forced her inside her apartment, she alleged, and took turns sexually assaulting her during a 15-minute ordeal, before fleeing on foot.

But Police inquiries, including a forensic examination of the scene, uncovered inconsistencies in the story.

Carreiro, who represented herself in court, told the Senior Magistrate: "I just want to apologise for making this false statement. I didn't know where to turn with the position I was put in, I put myself in, and I didn't think it would get blown up to this proportion."

She said her current boyfriend's mother called Police to report the attack and she "ended up just going along with it". "I also figured that if my ex, if he knew that this had happened to me, he would leave me alone as well."

Ms Clarke said Carreiro gave detectives such a full account of the "brutal sexual assault" and detailed descriptions of the supposed assailants that they were about to arrest two men in the East End when she confessed her lie.

The prosecutor added: "I don't understand why someone who has no previous convictions would do something like this. I don't know why any woman would think up a rape and one as brutal as this.

"It put the community on edge that there were these people in the community who could break into a house."

Mr. Warner said: "She thought it was no big thing to make up a story, however serious, to cover her tracks."

He gave tearful Carreiro, a clerk at furniture importers Joshua Bates Ltd., until November 22 to pay the $1,000 fine or face three months in prison. She has until January 22 to pay back Police.

Assistant Police Commissioner Paul Wright said after yesterday's hearing that the local community was rocked by the rape claim.

"There's been a lot of policing activity to follow up on what on the face of it appeared to be a most serious and heinous offence," he said, adding that the entire Eastern Criminal Investigation Unit worked on the case, with support from the Serious Crime Unit.

"They've done a very extensive investigation every day for the last seven days. Unfortunately this takes resources away from other active investigations."

Police spokesman Dwayne Caines said: "By the fact that this came to court, our hope is that it sends a clear message to members of the public that would like to use the system for their own perverted means that they will be put before the court."

He added: "We do not want this to be a deterrent for individuals who have legitimate cases. We believe that it's important to work with vulnerable members of our community to make them feel comfortable in coming forward."

Link.. 

Want Government Support ?Be Female and Have Your Lies Ready..

My thanks to paul parmenter for his commentary and his article..

Candidate for "Worst Mother in Britain" Award

This is a longish read, but to my mind just about the perfect example of what can happen when a society loses its marbles and surrenders to feminism, as Britain has now done.


This story has it all - how a perpetually indulged female fantasist is allowed to get away with hideous child cruelty under an endless tissue of lies by virtue of the all-powerful pussy pass; how none dared to question those lies for years even though they were as transparent as glass; how a woman can get anything whatsoever she demands, by a deadly combination of brazen deceit, bluster and bullying; how even the medical profession is too cowardly and pussy-whipped to ask glaringly obvious questions that could and should have ripped open her web of evil years ago; how she instinctively resorts to a false rape accusation in order to try to cover up her lies; how the police do everything they can to try to drag her husband into shared culpability, and are clearly frustrated when they can't do so; and how even when her reign of lies, cruelty and hideous self-indulgence is brought to an end, the establishment refuses to contemplate anything other than a miserably inadequate punishment... there is truly enough material here for an entire book on the warping of British society. Read it and learn. You will see why we are a truly sick country that I can't help but feel deserves all the shit into which we are sinking.




The first picture of the woman who forced her healthy son into a wheelchair and convinced doctors he was sick


By Barbara Davies
23rd October 2009


Fantasy life: Lisa Hayden-Johnson arrives at court in Exeter. She pretended her son had a life-threatening allergy which left him unable to eat

By any standards, it was a tear-jerking scene: a devoted mother presenting her desperately sick little boy to Camilla Parker Bowles at Westminster Abbey and helping him collect his Children of Courage medal.
Earlier that day, December 14, 2005, Lisa Hayden-Johnson took her five-year-old wheelchair-bound son to 10 Downing Street to have breakfast with Tony and Cherie Blair.
The merry-go-round continued when she appeared on GMTV, sitting on the sofa beside presenters Fiona Phillips and Andrew Castle, and telling the heart-breaking story of how her child had battled since birth with a life-threatening allergy which left him unable to eat.
Those who saw this heart-rending spectacle had no reason to suspect they were witnessing a woman who police would one day describe as 'Britain's most evil mother'.
No doubt they would have been astonished to know that every word that came from Hayden-Johnson's lips was a lie.
The truth? Her son was in perfect physical health. But Hayden-Johnson, who also faked her qualifications to get a job as a nurse, forced him into a wheelchair, fed him through a tube in his stomach and even allowed doctors, taken in by her deception, to perform unnecessary surgery on him.
Her lies proved to be lucrative, too. Aside from the thousands raised by local charities in Brixham, South Devon, where the family lived, Hayden-Johnson garnered an estimated £200,000 in benefits which she spent on home improvements and holidays.

The family also enjoyed a European cruise paid for by well-wishers and a car from Motability. Her son's school spent thousands on adaptions for his wheelchair.
Last week, after a two-year investigation which has left Devon and Cornwall Police aghast at the level of her deception, the 35-year-old pleaded guilty to child cruelty and perverting the course of justice at Exeter Crown Court. She will be sentenced in January.
Today, the Mail can name her and publish her picture for the first time after a court order banning her identification expired last night.
Now, the hundreds of people who were moved by Hayden-Johnson's plight will no doubt be wondering how a seemingly devoted mother could treat her youngest child in such a despicable manner and, above all, how she managed to con so many people - including her own husband and her parents - for so long.
She wrote to Simon Cowell about her son and then discharged him from hospital to use free X Factor tickets



Former neighbour, and nurse, Kate Neate, who used to live opposite Hayden-Johnson in Brixham, told me this week of the double life the seemingly perfect mother was living.
The 45-year-old used to see her neighbour's son - who cannot be named for legal reasons - going to school in an electric wheelchair, but playing football and riding a bike when he got home.
'She would tell us that he was being fed through a tube but I would see him eating sweets and ice cream in the garden,' said Mrs Neate.
'I was suspicious about her from the start, but you don't like to question a mother's word. I think she got away with it because she told everyone she was a qualified nurse, and the child wasn't old enough to dispute the symptoms she was telling the doctors about. And she was very confrontational and intimidating. She could pick an argument with anyone.'
The story began when her baby son was born nine weeks prematurely in 2001. He weighed just 3lb 6oz and was placed in a special care baby unit where he was put on a ventilator.
When Hayden-Johnson tried breastfeeding, the baby would not keep anything down and so was given a nasogastric tube for feeding.
As the mother of a sick baby, Hayden-Johnson was lavished with attention by sympathetic medical staff, friends and relatives.
And when she took her baby home, it seems, she was reluctant to give that up. Even though the boy's early troubles were soon behind him, she began calling out ambulances in the night and telling doctors that her baby could not keep his food down.


Unnecessary tests: Hayden-Johnson's son was sent to Great Ormond Street Hospital for investigations, which revealed nothing

So began the lies which spiralled into a fantasy existence lasting six years, during which time Hayden-Johnson managed to bamboozle doctors, insisting there was something wrong with her son, even when they could find no symptoms.

As the child began losing dangerous amounts of weight - because of lack of nutrition - they had no choice but to perform surgery to fit a feeding tube directly into his stomach when he was four years old.
He was seen by doctors at hospitals in Bristol before being sent to Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children for further investigations - which revealed nothing.
His mother, meanwhile, was telling anyone who would listen that he had cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, the throat disorder dysphagia and was allergic to nearly all food.
Her desire for attention, it seems, knew no bounds and Hayden-Johnson was soon trying to sell her story.


In one magazine article in 2004 she claimed that without his food pump her son would die, and that he had an allergy so rare that there were only six documented cases in the world.
She went on to describe the torment he suffered when he watched other members of his family eating normal meals. 'What choice did we have - make him sit with us at the dinner table, watching us eat, or get him to sit alone while we all ate together?' she said. 'Either of those seemed too cruel.'

Later she added: 'Guilt ate at me. I'd buy him a toy car every time I told him he couldn't have something to eat.'
And piling lie on lie, she described how her son had to face life without food.
'He can't eat at his friends' birthday parties or at family barbecues. He can't have a hotdog or an ice cream on the beach.'
Ending with the kind of saccharine statement she loved to use about her son, she said: 'When I look at him, I don't see a sick child. I see his cheeky smile and huge puppy-dog eyes.'
Back in Brixham, Hayden-Johnson soon became something of a local celebrity. Five years ago, when her son was three, she put out an appeal in her local paper asking for ideas on how to help the little boy move around with the heavy equipment required to pump milk into his stomach via a drip.
The family were inundated with offers of help from readers, and a carpenter, Pete Cuthbert, and designer, David Langford, offered to build him a model Ferrari in which to house the food pump. When he was presented with the gift, Hayden-Johnson dressed herself up for yet more photoshoots and TV appearances.
'We're really overwhelmed,' she gushed on local television. 'There are a lot of very good people out there.'
But when the cameras were switched off, her self-important, confrontational manner began to grate with some of her neighbours - as did her boasts about the holidays the family had been given because of her son's illness.
Neighbour Mrs Neate recalls how on one occasion, Hayden-Johnson wrote to Simon Cowell telling him of her son's plight, and later discharged him from hospital - he often went in for tests - so she could use the free X Factor tickets sent to them in the post.


Lies and rewards: Hayden-Johnson wrote to Simon Cowell about her son's plight and was sent free X Factor tickets

'They began having a very good standard of living,' says Mrs Neate.
'She also told me that she had sued medical staff and claimed damages. It's horrific to think that she used her son for her own gains like that.'
While this was going on, Hayden-Johnson lurched even further into her fantasy world, lying about her qualifications to find work as a phlebotomist - a blood nurse - at a medical centre in Torbay.
In fact, she had no qualifications at all. She had embarked on a nursing course at King's College in London while still living with her parents in Croydon as a teenager, but she dropped out after just a few months.
In the end, the lying spiralled out of control. Questioned by one suspicious doctor in Torbay Hospital about her son, Hayden-Johnson became aggressive and hysterical.
At the same time she was raising eyebrows at the clinic where she worked because of her over-bearing manner with patients.
Instead of admitting her lies, she simply told more, claiming this time that her son was diabetic and took blood-sugar samples at home which, when compared to tests done by professionals, were clearly inaccurate.
Three blood samples provided by Hayden-Johnson contained readings that seemed too high for even a genuine diabetic. When blood tests were done in hospital, the readings were normal.


Police believe that she may have laced her son's food and drink with huge amounts of sugar before taking the pin-prick test, but they cannot know for sure.
In 2007, when doctors suggested examining her son over three days in hospital, she panicked, no doubt realising she was about to be rumbled.

In May that year, in a desperate bid to cancel her son's hospital visit, she made up a story that she had been sexually assaulted by a mystery motorcyclist near her home.
She faked injuries by cutting herself and pouring bleach on her self-inflicted wounds, hoping to divert police attention away from the real crime.
But when police told her they were about to arrest a man for the crime, she panicked and confessed that she had made up the story.
She was arrested in October 2007 and, finally, her web of lies began to unravel. At the time, her husband was also arrested. But after questioning, police decided he had no idea about the massive deception and released him without charge.
When police officers searched Hayden-Johnson's home, they were still unprepared for what they found.
Her son's bedroom was described as being 'like a scene out of TV's Casualty'. Beside a specialist medical bed were boxes and boxes of unopened medication and pump feed - supposed to be used in his nasogastric tube, but unopened because her son didn't actually need it - as well as the green nurse's uniform she liked to wear at home.
Downstairs, they found homemade videos and family photographs showing the little boy running along the beach without his wheelchair or his tubes and eating roast dinners and burgers.
All of this raises disturbing questions about how Hayden-Johnson's husband could not have been aware something was not right. Yet police remain convinced that he was also a victim of her lies, and allowed his domineering wife - who he believed was medically qualified - to persuade him she knew what was best for their son.

According to investigator DC Mark Uren: 'She is a cruel, manipulative, evil mother who constantly lied to the medical professionals that her son was the sickest child in Britain.'

This is not a view shared by Hayden-Johnson's parents, Barry, an engineer, and Maureen. They told me this week that the allegations against their daughter were 'a tissue of lies'.
Certainly, it must be hard for the couple, who now live in Paignton, South Devon, to comprehend how the middle of their three daughters could have caused so much suffering to their grandson.
Her childhood in South London, was happy and stable. She attended a well-respected local comprehensive, Edenham High School in Croydon, left school at 16 with a handful of GCSEs and married young, at 19, to a supermarket manager.
After the birth of their daughter in 1998, the couple moved to Brixham in South Devon where their son was born at Torbay Hospital.
Just two years ago, Hayden-Johnson bragged about her 'perfect' life living by the sea.
'I have a fantastic life with my husband Chris and two children,' she wrote on her Friends Reunited webpage not long before she was arrested.

'We all moved to South Devon and I am now being a completely devoted mum and living off the man. Fantastic!' Behind closed doors, however, it is clear all was not well.
In the past few weeks, there has been little sign that Hayden-Johnson is sorry for her behaviour. Now estranged from her husband, she is living with a new boyfriend in a house in Torquay while she awaits sentencing.
Lawyers from the Crown Prosecution Service had spent months preparing themselves for a trial expected to last several weeks.

At the 11th hour last week, she changed her plea to guilty in the hope that the judge sentencing her will be lenient. After mitigation by defence barristers she will, in all likelihood, end up serving little more than a year.
But it is likely that the repercussions of her appalling behaviour will last a lifetime.
Now, her eight-year-old son is at home, the wheelchair and the tubes taken away. Quite how long the mental scars will take to heal, though, is anyone's guess.



Read more:

I sometimes wonder if Doctors are just too interested in following the PC norm and ignore the oath they took after their training, you know the one "heal the sick" and also wonder if they are too interested in their income, their position or should  they just take a new oath. The Hypocritical Oath..


Where they can ignore their original intentions to heal the sick and nurture them, instead just cater to feminist ideals..

Botched Judge Threat Probe Downs Fathers 4 Justice Website..

As with everyone else, I do on the odd occasion have a really good smirk at the blatant and obvious bias governments inflict on any member of the Men's Movement..

What are they afraid of ?

Sanity ?

Have a read of this insanity introduced by the sexist, male-hating courts as well as the bias in the government offices and decide for yourself if those deviants are not influenced by feminist propaganda ?

Botched judge threat probe downs Fathers 4 Justice website

The government faces accusations of technical incompetence
and waste after it went to the High Court and shut down the
Fathers 4 Justice website, wrongly claiming campaigners had
threatened to publish the home addresses of 237 judges.

Lawyers for Matt O'Connor, the controversial group's founder,
are now preparing action against the Ministry of Justice to
recover costs and damages from taxpayers. He alleges civil
servants failed to perform basic checks on the origins of the
threat before launching a legal attack.

The battle began in late June, when the Ministry of Justice received an email falsely purporting to come from O'Connor. It said Fathers 4 Justice would expose judges on its website as revenge for perceived unfairness in family court decisions.

Officials responsible for the security of HM Courts Service commissioned lawyers in the Treasury Solicitor's Department, which provides legal services across government, to get an emergency injuction against O'Connor, ordering him to shut down the Fathers 4 Justice website.

It was granted by the High Court on July 16. Failure to comply would have landed him in jail for contempt of court, so O'Connor duly took the website offline.

His lawyers immediately began an appeal against the injunction and fought for the Ministry of Justice to disclose the email at the centre of the case. Once they did, O'Connor said, it was obvious the threat did not come from him or the genuine Fathers 4 Justice website.

Last Wednesday 22 July, the government withdrew the injunction.

"I'm not a techie but any fool could have looked at the Message-ID and seen it was a fake - a 10-year-old could have done it," O'Connor told The Register, adding that no attempt was made to verify the email by contacting him directly.

"Someone there is either extremely gullible or vindictive."

In a statement, HM Courts Service said it was continuing to probe the threatening email.

"The injunction sought to prevent the publication of sensitive information. Following representations from the parties on the origins of the email, we have discontinued our injunction and are continuing our investigations elsewhere," it said.

O'Connor is now preparing defamation proceedings against the government because materials disclosed by the Ministry of Justice showed officials shared details about the fake email with other departments, and with the 237 judges threatened.

"All those judges think I made personal threats against them," he said.

Perceived threats to the security of the judiciary are taken very seriously. Earlier this year a Sheffield man was arrested because of his peripheral involvement in administering the activist website Indymedia.

Police demanded to know the identity of a user who posted the home address of a judge who had just handed down jail sentences in a landmark animal rights extremism trial. The man remains on police bail.

Link..

Obama: I have Control Of the Media..

I don't know if you noticed it or not but whenever "Chairman" Kevin Rudd (Australian Prime Minister) or Obama (American Presidential Lacky to Feminists) always have Women in the background on their media video releases..

Reason, well one could bandy about the "women's vote" being behind their thinking as women will and always have voted for greater government control as it will pay them more money. I know, cynical but true..

On other occassions I have read left wing nutjobs screaming about the media not performing their duty and presenting articles that are biased, political as well as being pro-right wing. They were of the opinion that ALL media were against their cause and needed to be government controlled so they are forced to only view the Obama g'mint in it's appropriate light..

Be careful what you wish for..


False Rape Witch Hunts Gone Wild..

I did bandy about in one of my previous blogs the amount of false rape claims noting that officers on a Police Forum (which will remain anonymous) commented that 80% of the rape claims they investigated were indeed false and I also suggested that rape claims were at about 30-50% false..

This comment is the crux of the problem, this is where they receive their permission to destroy other peoples lives. ALL Hail feminists..

Dr. Demosthenes Lorandos, who is a psychologist and an attorney, states that “the crime of Rape has been known as the easiest criminal allegation to make by an alleged victim, and the hardest to disprove by the defendant.” And that “a series of bias laws has made it easier to obtain convictions”.

About the 30-50% false rape statement, it appears I am not the only one..

When the U.S. Air Force annonymously questioned about 300 women who alleged rape, about 20 percent admitted they lied either just before taking a lie detector test or right after failing one.

The most common reasons they gave for lying were spite or to cover up an affair.

After further investigation, the study concluded that 60 percent of the accusations were false. (Forensic Science Digest, vol. 11. no. 4, December 1985).

According to a nine-year study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin, in over 40 percent of the cases reviewed the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994.)

False Rape Witch Hunts Gone Wild
Friday, October 23, 2009
By John Lucas

Since last year, we have been following another interesting false rape charge in an area of Maine which has an exorbitant amount of rape charges for its population (60,000). They are averaging 4 rape charges per month.

The shameless tactics of Mary Kellett, and Michael Povich continue in the state of Maine. It makes one wonder what they are really doing in their capacities if they feel it necessary to prosecute every false allegation this vigorously.

Here is what they’ve been up to lately. These cases should be dismissed with prejudice. Instead, they enable the behaviors of this sick woman. Her name is Ligia Filler, and she is a man’s worst nightmare. Here is a sample of evidence that Ms. Kellett has been fighting hard to suppress.

The state of Maine, Michael Povich, and Mary Kellett are guilty of trying to block this evidence and the Filler’s continue to run out of money to help this poor man. This must stop and stop soon.

According to victims of prosecutions in Maine’s Bar Harbor region, what is taking place is a modern day Witch Hunt. Court documents suggest that numerous men are currently facing charges of sexual misconduct in a small county of little more than 50,000 people.At the center of these prosecutions is a 44 year old Assistant District Attorney Mary N. Kellett, who has a reputation for prosecuting men on questionable evidence and questionable probable cause. As in the Salem Witch Trials, these prosecutions are often based solely on accusations with no physical or corroborating evidence.

Accusations against men in the county are widely publicized along with their pictures, identities, and details of their private lives. Members of this small community, who make up the jury pool, are presented with the notion that when a prosecutor files numerous charges of sexual abuse that there exist a solid, or at lease a reasonable, basis in evidence to justify the arrest, detention, and a public prosecution of these men.

But the evidence presented in courts very often shows that any accusation made regardless of the evidence was used to prosecute the accused men. Some local attorneys have asserted that county prosecutor Mary Kellett ignores evidence and the search for truth, but instead focuses on getting men convicted for the allegations made by women. Kellett has made statements that she does not believe women lie about rape. And even when some trials illustrate that the accuser engaged in consensual sexual activity, Kellett herself later characterizes the activities as punishment, done out of anger, and rationalizes why they were not consensual.

These beliefs are shared by the most extreme feminists who for years have asserted that all sex between men and women is rape, and that women just don’t realize that they are being raped even by their partners. In Hancock County Maine, this extreme feminist philosophy is being put to practice by the District Attorney’s office. The prosecutor treats female accusations as evidence and absolute truth. A team of sex offense responders at the DA’s office immediately embrace female’s accusations and coach them through the process. In the name of public safety, men are immediately stripped of numerous Constitutional rights and effectively forced to disprove the accusations against them in a public criminal trial.

The public’s notions that prosecutors are faithful guardians of civil rights and conservative discretion prove to be false in Hancock County. In practice, the prosecutor’s credibility is publicly re-enforced solely through wide publicity of rare convictions. The line between justifiable and unjustifiable prosecutions of men is blurred by selective media coverage.

Little if any publicity is given to the bulk of the cases involving men who were criminally charged and prosecuted with little evidence beyond accusations, sometimes made by their girlfriends, wives, troubled step children, or occasional sex partners. These men may remain in jail for months, lose everything they have, sometimes can’t see their children, and never repair their reputations or the damage done to their lives. No articles are written about how these men manage to put their lives back together, get employment after being falsely arrested and prosecuted for rape, or how vulnerable they become to future false allegations by other abusive females in their lives.

The prosecutors like Mary Kellett act with full immunity for their actions against men.

And it’s not just for alleged sex crimes for which men are systematically punished by the District Attorneys office in Hancock County. Men in the community have been criminally charged for such alleged crimes as splashing water on their wives, spitting, for “terrorism” due to offensive song lyrics, visual aggression, and for what often can be viewed as any action against a female. But at least those “crimes” don’t carry the stigma and a 30 year prison sentence which comes with each class “A” gross sexual assault charge, which is a frequent charge against men in Hancock County, and one of the easiest and most profitable for a prosecutor to undertake.

Dr. Demosthenes Lorandos, who is a psychologist and an attorney, states that “the crime of Rape has been known as the easiest criminal allegation to make by an alleged victim, and the hardest to disprove by the defendant.” And that “a series of bias laws has made it easier to obtain convictions”.

Not surprising that most of the innocent men who are exonerated by the Innocence Project through DNA evidence, sometimes after decades in prison, were falsely accused and convicted of rape. Some studies have placed the rate of false sexual assault reports at 50% or more. That rate jumps to almost 80% when accusations are made during divorce or child custody disputes with girlfriends or wives.

And yet in Maine, media coverage remain eerily silent about local false allegations and prosecutions of innocent men whose lives and reputations are destroyed as a result. The female accusers are never named and continue to live in obscurity even after their accusations prove false. Instead, the local reports graphically focus on covering the accusations against men, and at times even imply that the acquitted men have cheated justice.

One Bangor television station aired an interview with a local rape crisis center official who stated that even if a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, it is most important for law enforcement to believe the woman, act on her report, and do exactly what she wants them to do. This implies that arresting, charging, and publicly prosecuting innocent men is less harmful than for authorities to question the words and motives of a woman making the accusations. This appears to be the policy adopted in the Bar Harbor region of Maine.

Crime statistics for the region have consistently shown a low rape rate, yet not long after becoming a prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney Mary Kellett offered her own statistic of the Bar Harbor region. Speaking to a local newspaper she stated that it could be difficult to find jurors in the area for sex cases because many people have been victims of sex offenses or have been accused of committing them.

An anonymous victim of prosecution by Mary Kellett stated: “I will never have any faith in the justice system. They aren’t interested in the truth. It’s a game for them. Some day this will go down as witch hunts.” “My family just wants to put this behind them. But it will never be over. I’m still receiving hate mail because of my support [for the accused]. [The prosecutor] used every unfair, low trick in the book to get a conviction and when a jury of 12 called him not guilty they then say ‘just because he wasn’t found guilty doesn’t mean he’s innocent’. I lock my doors and windows and turn the dogs out at night.”

One case which has received some attention is that of Vladek Filler, a husband who was accused of sexual assault by his wife during their bitter split up and custody battle. Filler, a self employed honors graduate from Babson College, decided to leave his wife after 16 years and get custody of his two sons. Child Protective Services and Court investigations granted Filler temporary custody of his children. His wife was found to be a threat and had her supervised visits with them suspended.

Prior to being arrested and charged for his wife’s accusations, Filler sought help from a local domestic violence organization which turned him away and chose to give assistance to his abusive wife instead. Filler sought a protection order from court and his wife decided to drop the “nuclear bomb” of divorce and custody battles. She accused Filler of abuse, child molestations, and spousal rape. She demanded immediate custody of their children. A video about the events appeared on YouTube.

Despite absence of any corroborating evidence other than his wife’s accusation, the children were taken away, and prosecutor Mary Kellett had Filler arrested, charged, and eventually convicted. What emerged after his January 2009 trial were revealing details of how prosecutions of men are conducted by prosecutor Mary Kellett and the Hancock County DA’s office.

Filler was apparently not allowed to present any evidence at all of the bitter custody battle, his wife’s troubled past, or her false claims of abuse in another custody battle with another man. nKellett, in turn told the jury “there was no evidence that the sexual assaults did not occur”, and placed the burden on Filler to prove his innocence. Kellett suggested that if forensic and physical examinations were conducted they would impede justice in this case and that statistically Filler was more likely to sexually assault his wife than a stranger. Aware that Filler was prevented from presenting evidence, Kellett repeatedly told to the jury that a child custody dispute did not even exist and therefore could not be a motive for false accusations by his wife.

When considering the disturbing details of the Filler case, one can’t help but to wonder how something like this could happen in our justice system. What is taking place in Hancock County Maine is extremism based on a myth that men are inherently bad, and are a threat to helpless and innocent women; that the State needs to punish and control men to maintain order within relationships and families. This is not much different from how Puritans viewed women accused of witchcraft in their community. The way men are being characterized in Maine has caused the public to be fearful and suspicious of men. Maine’s Attorney General Janet Mills, a former co-founder of the Maine Women’s Lobby, recently stated that her number one priority is domestic violence, and that “We need to send the message to boys and young men in Maine”. Such views from Maine’s top law enforcement official are made despite numerous credible studies suggesting that women are just as responsible, if not more, for domestic violence and child abuse.

Such gender biased rhetoric demonizes boys, men, and fathers and leads to the numerous falsely accused men to face years in prison and the perpetual skewing of domestic violence statistics.

So powerful is the myth against men, that despite difficult fiscal and economic times, the flow of funding to the domestic violence industry continues to be strong, as does the prosecution of men. The message of the rhetoric being sent to the girls in Maine is “blame the boys for everything and the State will do the rest”, so maybe the message to the boys in Maine should now be “God help you”.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 23rd, 2009 at 6:13 am and is filed under Vox Populi. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. | 229 views | Trackback | Print this page |

John Lukas is a long time warrior against the gender biased policies of the domestic violence industry and a victim of the system as it exists today. His focus is on domestic violence practices and policies that are often in contradiction of their actual intent. He runs http://wadvpress.org .

Link..

Sexism in Education, False Abuse Reports, DV is Not About Politics..

A couple of interesting articles from MensENews..

Shreveport Times recognizes domestic violence is not a gender issue
October 22, 8:27 AM
Domestic Violence Examiner
Trudy Schuett

In a story that appeared this morning, the Shreveport Times reported on a citywide sweep to clear about 75 warrants, which netted 19 arrests.

What is notable about this story is that the first person to be mentioned was a woman. Qualandra Johnson was arrested on five outstanding warrants, including one aggravated assault charge. Another woman was wanted on 25 separate warrants for various charges which included domestic battery and cruelty to animals.

A sidebar notes the arrests and the names of those arrested. It should come as no surprise that more women are on that list.

Also of note is the fact their homepage features a PSA that mentions both female and male victims.

Society at large needs to recognize that domestic violence is neither a gender issue, nor a political issue. If we expect to begin finding solutions to this problem, we cannot look at only a part of it and attempt to rationalize away the rest.

The Shreveport Times is to be congratulated for its even-handed coverage that is still remarkable and rare, even in these supposedly enlightened times.

Why not drop a note to the reporter, Loresha Wilson ljwilson@gannett.com or leave a comment at the story and thank them for reporting the news as it really is.

Link.. 

And this particular article clearly demonstrates how women via their own mischief can artificially raise the abuse stats. just by making false statements as well as fraudulently demanding government handouts.. Amazingly enough it's from the feminist epicentre media, The New York Times. It's a wonder Maureen Dowd did not rant on this and defend their behaviour in her usual cognitive dissonance fashion. .

6 Posed as Abuse Victims to Get Rent Subsidies, Officials Say

By AL BAKER
Published: October 20, 2009

In a notoriously expensive city, people will do anything to get a break on housing costs. They might hide a relative, change their name or suggest they earn less than they really do.

But six women went too far and were arrested in a particularly imaginative scheme for seeking the government’s help with rent payments, officials said on Tuesday.

The women have been charged with submitting fraudulent documents — including forged police reports and court orders — to portray themselves as victims of domestic violence in an apparent attempt to jump to the front of a long waiting list for government subsidized apartments, said Rose Gill Hearn, the commissioner of the city’s Department of Investigation.

Since she took her position in 2002, Ms. Gill Hearn has seen hundreds of housing fraud cases a year “of different permutations,” she said. “But this is the first time that D.O.I. has investigated and uncovered individuals who are engaging in housing fraud by posing as victims of domestic violence.”

The desire for lucrative government subsidies is deep.

As of Sept. 22, there were 127,764 families on the New York City Housing Authority’s waiting list for Section 8 vouchers, said Howard Marder, a spokesman for the agency.

The voucher program can be worth thousands of dollars a year; tenants who qualify for the subsidy must pay 30 percent of their adjusted gross income toward the rent, while the remainder is taken care of with federal money passed through the authority to a landlord.

The city Housing Authority is accepting Section 8 applications from only three groups of people: victims of domestic violence; those referred by prosecutors who are deemed intimidated witnesses in criminal cases; and certain people referred by the city’s Administration for Children’s Services.

It was similarities in some police reports and other documents — picked out by a Housing Authority manager — that drew attention to the six women in the current series of cases, officials said. The manager reported the irregularities, and the Department of Investigation began an inquiry in May.

On July 1, three people were arrested: Barbara Goss, 52, of Manhattan; Chevelle Richardson, 38; and Ms. Richardson’s daughter, Chandera Richardson, 20, officials said. The elder Ms. Richardson filed an application for Section 8 housing on Jan. 29 claiming that her daughter had been the victim of domestic violence, the officials said.

The application, and a similar one from Ms. Goss, included a court-issued temporary order of protection, a domestic incident report from the Police Department and a letter from Safe Horizon, an agency that works with domestic violence victims. All of the documents were forged, officials said.

On July 15, Shanelle Reed, 28, of Queens, was arrested and on Tuesday, Neri Garces, 44, of Yonkers, was arrested, officials said. The sixth woman, Deshanna Graham, 29, is in custody in Pennsylvania, officials said.

All of the cases are being prosecuted by the office of Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney. The women face charges including criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and third degree, and offering a false instrument for filing.

It was not immediately clear if the six women collaborated. Asked about the cluster of cases arising at once, Ms. Gill Hearn said that the women were charged separately, but that the investigation was continuing.

A call to the Legal Aid Society, which has represented some of the women, was not immediately returned. Enrico Demarco, a lawyer appointed by the court to represent Ms. Garces, said after her arraignment on Tuesday that “at this point she is denying the allegations and has entered a plea of not guilty.”
Link.. 

And finally, stating what I have written as well as Podcasted about for some years, finally receiving some well deserved recognition..

Selective Concern On Sex Imbalances
Gender-equity cops are pushing for preferential treatment for females over males in the sciences.

by Stuart Taylor

Saturday, Oct. 24, 2009

Women now claim more than 57 percent of all bachelor's degrees, 61 percent of all master's degrees, and half of all professional and doctoral degrees, according to Education Department data cited by University of Michigan economist Mark Perry and others. They also earn more Ph.D.s than men in the humanities, education, health sciences, and social sciences, in-cluding two-thirds of new psychology doctorates.

Such data might find a principled administration and academic establishment busy documenting and attacking discrimination against or cultural hostility toward under-represented males.

Link..

Police: Do you Have Any Idea The Paperwork Invovled in Charging a Female..

Oops, this one was for last year and yet we wait for the update, like it's going to appear..

200 Hours of wasted Police time, what would that account for ?, $ 2000.00 per hour, maybe?

Just think about all that PC drivel they invented and all that additional paper work to be filled out, all those interveiws, all that running around and all those medical check etc.etc.etc. as they would have already been instructed by the previous feminist g'mint to ensure that the paperwork would be plentiful as we can attest right here in this state. Quote from a member of the Police Force when suggested that he arrest a malignant obnoxious female accused of abusing, encouraging abuse and being abusefull: Police Officer states " Do you have any idea what paper work is involved just to charge a female for any crime ?"...

Well, NO, a criminal is not a criminal apparently as long as it's a "V" holder..

And we do have a brand spanking new luxury hotel formerly known as a prison for the privileged princesses right here in our state just in case they feel like a holiday.Bedrooms with en-suites and courtyards..

Will that be "Earl Grey or Chi"..

Napier police say they have spent 200 hours of investigation time looking into three fake rape complaints in the past 12 months

9 May 2008
Napier police are frustrated by people filing false complaints, with three fake rapes reported over the last 12 months.

Spokeswoman Kris McGehan says two women made false rape complaints, while a 15-year-old girl claimed she was abducted from a Napier home and raped.

Ms McGehan says the false complaints wasted time that could have been better spent on genuine cases. She says the enquiries absorbed around 200 hours of investigation time.

Global Warming: Save the Planet, Eat Your Dog..

" I am just a woking the dog"..

As the hysteria increases and only because you are not speaking out, the "righters" continue on their merry misinforming  way. or is that "species" way ?

The couple have assessed the carbon emissions created by popular pets, taking into account the ingredients of pet food and the land needed to create them.
"If you have a German shepherd or similar-sized dog, for example, its impact every year is exactly the same as driving a large car around," Brenda Vale said.
"A lot of people worry about having SUVs but they don't worry about having Alsatians and what we are saying is, well, maybe you should be because the environmental impact ... is comparable."
These two wierdos are going to be as popular as malaria, dentist visit and a prostate examination,,


Professor Vale says the title of the book is meant to shock, but the couple, who do not have a cat or dog, believe the reintroduction of non-carnivorous pets into urban areas would help slow down global warming.


Startled dogs and their owners wish to know: Exactly who are global warmers saving the planet for?

 The eco-pawprint of a pet dog is twice that of a 4.6-litre Land Cruiser driven 10,000 kilometres a year, researchers have found.
 Victoria University professors Brenda and Robert Vale, architects who specialise in sustainable living, say pet owners should swap cats and dogs for creatures they can eat, such as chickens or rabbits, in their provocative new book Time to Eat the Dog: The real guide to sustainable living.

And for dessert...?




You have got to read this..

The comments are even more enlightening, well, not really..

23.10.09

Obama almost wins..

As you may have already guessed I am not a fan of Hussein and will never be but I expect American women will re-elect this misandric President as he has installed the male haters in the White House under the guise that all women are just victims and should be given special dispensation and made exempt from prosecution as they eye the concept of closing all women's prisons as women are not that way inclined..

But guess who else the girls liked so much and voted back into office, including the blatant support of all feminists, he is recognised as well..?

The largest for an elected president in his first year is Bill Clinton’s 11-point slide between his first and second quarters.

Gee ! I always thought he would have been a-head..

Obama’s 9-point slide between quarters ranks as one of the steepest for a president at any point in his first year in office.
Link..