So, who do women think does all the work?..

The ongoing truth is just finally surfacing as the lame-stream media finally catches up on what we have been saying for decades. They cowered to the feminist agenda. Finally those cowards have to confess and do what they were supposed to do originally and that is to tell the truth..

It seems that the idea of the "useless man" slobbing around the home while his woman does all the work is nothing but a post-feminist myth. 

How journalism has suffered and realise what a load of lies, irrelevant sexist data those cowards have produced. Their comments and coherence is on record for future reference. Are we going to ignore their betrayal and cowardice ?

NO..

So now we have this..

Refreshing or what..

See, those cowards know which side their bread is buttered, not that I am saying that this writer is that but just imagine the agony those poor bastards had to go through to write a male positive article..

So, who do women think does all the work?

The idea of 'useless man’ has at last been revealed as a feminist myth, says James Delingpole.

By James Delingpole

Published: 6:41AM GMT 24 Nov 2009

The elusive spanner fairy? Photo: John Robertson

Do you have any Spanner Fairies in your household? In our home we've got loads. We must do, for I can't think of any other explanation as to how all the tedious male-oriented chores get done. It's the Spanner Fairies who go round the house last thing at night, checking the downstairs doors and windows are locked; and it's the Spanner Fairies who are in charge of putting out the rubbish and getting the car fixed and taxed and MOT-ed.

The Spanner Fairies also take care of specialist tasks like watching Boy play in rugger matches and buying Girl musical instruments. And they are the biggest contributor to the household budget, slogging their guts out day-in, day-out so that delightful Wife, adorable Kids, and utterly useless, lazy Husband can be watered, fed and housed.

So why, you ask, don't these poor Spanner Fairies get more credit? Funny, I was going to ask exactly the same thing, till I heard about a fascinating report published this week in the journal Sex Roles.

This report, based on interviews with 15,000 working women, casts intriguing new light on the relationship between men and women. It seems that the idea of the "useless man" slobbing around the home while his woman does all the work is nothing but a post-feminist myth. According to Rebecca Meisenbach, from Missouri University, it has been propagated by women who feel "an overwhelming sense of guilt" at having a career, rather than fulfilling their traditional gender role of wife and mother.

Naturally, there's a part of me that would like to congratulate Dr Meisenbach. After four decades of feminist drivel stigmatising men as inept, workshy, uncommunicative neanderthals whose only significant inventions are rape and war, it's about time someone spoke up in our defence.

Consider how men are now portrayed in films, books, adverts, and sitcoms from Men Behaving Badly to Friends: always it's the boys who are feckless, one-track-minded, chauvinistic and basic, while the girls are invariably the much put-upon omnicompetents who do all the real work and make everything right in the end.

You'd never guess from all this that men had written the complete works of Shakespeare, painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, climbed Everest, discovered electricity, invented the internal combustion engine and decoded DNA. Nor that, every now and then over the years, we have made perfectly good husbands, fathers and grandparents.

So yes, up to a point, I would agree with Dr Meisenbach's conclusion: whether we're changing lightbulbs, breeding strapping offspring or creating great works of art, we men really are much more useful than our womenfolk give us credit for.

Where she goes wrong, though, is in suggesting that women grumbling about how little men do round the house is a new phenomenon, borne out of some weird psychological response to their dual role as career women/housewives. I would say that it's just another case of women doing what they've always done.

If you don't believe me, try breeding a daughter. From almost the moment she can speak, she will dedicate her tiny life to bossing Daddy around, telling him where he's going wrong and ordering him to do chores – often ganging up with Mummy in sisterly solidarity to mock and diminish Daddy's supposedly pathetic achievements.

This isn't learned behaviour; this is hardwired into the female system. A woman's work is never done – and boy, doesn't she just love to remind us of the fact. But when her mate performs similar wonders, his only reward is his own virtue. After all, it wasn't really the man who did those boring domestic tasks, was it? It was those wondrous, perpetually unappreciated Spanner Fairies

AS far as I am concerned I would like to see feminists per Se, removed from their positions, their office, maligned and alienated for the pariahs they really are. Humiliated, broke, denigrated, perceived to be the lowest form of human debris they are, jailed, held accountable for their crimes against humanity, for the unnecessary suffering they have caused..

Ahh ! that would be my dream and that is my future aim..

Link.. 

Paula has left a new comment on your post..

Paula has left a new comment on your post "Climategate, Mediagate, and Abusegate..":

I wanted to email this to you, but the one in your profile doesn't seem to work? Anyway, I have been reading your blog which is quite interesting, especially since I agree with much of it and inevitably get lambasted by my more feminist friends if I express my views. BUT I would dearly love to know: Do you think badly of ALL women? For example, where you say "...women are vicious, callous and violent abusers." I have to say I am rather offended to feel I have been put in this category! If you meant (and I hope you did) that abusive women are like this, then yes I agree wholeheartedly... but to tar us all with the same brush is no different to what the feminists do when they say men are all "heartless, sexually incontinent pigs" when blatantly this description refers to only a minuscule portion of the male population! I am all for men's rights and for people's rights in general, but please, please don't make the same mistakes feminism has. Modern feminism is the worst thing that ever happened to women, and a backlash from men won't improve things any on either side - nor would it be fair on that large percentage of us who are not abusive screaming harpies (honest!).

Thanks for the comment Paula and I am aware that I do go over the top and also realise that my responses are similar to the male-haters. Point taken..

This blog when it was first started, the feminists agitprop movement was in it's hay-day. All and any comment that surfaced from them were anti-male and totally negative. The lamestream media followed up those alienations with vigour and verve. Casting all men into one category and maligning men at will. Needless to say that my response was along those same lines, my response was to try and negate those accusations as much as I could. I am glad to say that my rather blunt observations has had the outcome that I was seeking and that is "How would women feel if I take the same attitude that feminists have taken towards all men and deflect it towards them"..

So "How does that feel"..? Maligning an individual just because of his sex..

In today's media they clearly demonstrate that "women do nothing wrong". This is still the case as I write.
The media will go out of it's way to ensure that every wrongdoing instigated by males is front page news and all the wrongdoing by women are relegated to the back pages and explained by only a few lines, meanwhile copious amount of photos depicting women to be smiling, caring and the epitomy of truth, honesty and sobriety is shown daily.
One would be of the opinion that women are incapable of breaking the law or doing anything wrong if one was to read or listen or watch the media in action today, right now !!

So I generalise for affect, as feminists have done for the last 40 years. Those haters have all but destroyed men's reputation using lies, insinuations and bogus studies. Ensuring that all men are all labelled and tarred with the same brush. This has been ignored by feminists and their lackies but encouraged by all women without exception. Women's behaviour today is a direct result of that action. There are always exception but the response is so miniscule as to be insignificant..

So, in order to bring attention to the current situation and you would have to be a male to recognise it, no longer can or should we not point out that there is anti-male sexism, discrimination and there is a current force at work to ensure that outcome..

You complain about being "tarred" from the comments on my blog which is not that old, just five years. Men have had to tolerate that abuse for the last 40 years and has anyone ever bothered to ask how we feel about that, NO..

Neither do they even care..

As far as this is comment is concerned, I disagree..

"and a backlash from men won't improve things any on either side"

Paula, we have tried being nice but it does not work. The Men's Movement is where it is today because we stopped being nice and ceased cow-towing to those lunatics, we now concerntrate on ensuring that women get the message, we are really, really pissed off and things are going to have to change. It's as simple as that..

By the way, I have on copiuos occassions stated that I do not hate women and have daughters myself whom I love dearly. My concern is now for my grandchildren who are being raised on false precepts, conditioned with feminist doctrine and alienated from men in general.. ( Check the total sex of teachers at any school, check seating arrangements on airlines concerning placement of children)..

Climategate, Mediagate, and Abusegate..

Climategate, Mediagate, and Abusegate
Monday, December 7, 2009
By Carey Roberts

Attention Global Warming Skeptics: There’s no need to work ourselves into a dither over Climategate, the risible global caper designed to make us believe the world will soon be turning into a burnt crisp. After all, Climategate is the new kid on the block, compared to all the other Leftist bamboozles.

Take Mediagate, the fact that the lamestream media stonewalled the Climategate story for two full weeks, hoping to get beyond the Copenhagen summit to limit the fall-out. But this past weekend the media moguls finally realized they had to pull back the green velvet curtain – and then used every trick in the book to downplay the scandal.

The Washington Post featured the story on Saturday when no one bothers to read the newspaper. CBS aired the report knowing its news program would be preempted by college football. NBC reassured its global warming true believers “the evidence is overwhelming that man is behind climate change.” And ABC mentioned the dust-up without revealing what the incriminatory emails actually said.

How’s that for full disclosure?

But the media is still playing footsy with another Leftist fairytale. It’s known as Abusegate.

Take the Tiger Woods case. Everyone knows his wife went after him with a nine-iron, which is a form of criminal assault. But how many media accounts put Woods and “victim of domestic violence” within a par-5 golf hole of each other? (And if we’re going to say marital infidelity justifies partner assault, let’s be sure to tell all the cougars out there to bone up on their self-defense skills.)

The cover-up of female partner aggression dates back to 1977. That’s when University of Delaware professor Susanne Steinmetz published an article titled “The Battered Husband Syndrome.” Her ground-breaking research revealed women are just as likely to abuse.

But the feminists were not going to allow her research to upset the ideological apple cart. After all, domestic disputes are all about evil men who try to control and dominate their wives with “violence or the subliminal threat of violence.” At least that’s what rad-fem icon Gloria Steinem once said.

So when they got wind of Steinmetz’s apostasy, the libbers began a whispering campaign deriding her work as “anti-feminist.” Then the enlightened souls who aspired to stop the cycle of violence called in bomb threats. Steinmetz soon took the hint and called a halt to her research.

Across the pond in England, abuse-shelter founder Erin Pizzey reached essentially the same conclusion as Steinmetz, going so far as to write a tell-all about rolling-pin wielding wives. “Abusive telephone calls to my home, death threats, and bomb scares, became a way of living for me and for my family. Finally, the bomb squad asked me to have all my mail delivered to their head quarters,” a shell-shocked Pizzey would later reveal.

So while the global-warming hucksters confined themselves to relatively benign enhancements of temperature data, the feminist-fascists proved Philip Jones and his fellow Climate Research Unit perjurers to be rank amateurs when it came to the art of information control.

But now the feminists’ Orwellian methods have been outed for all to see (www.mediaradar.org/docs/RADARreport-50-DV-Myths.pdf ):

1. Make propaganda-like claims about a fabricated “consensus.”
2. Play definitional word-games with terms like “abuse” and “violence.”
3. Rely on biased crime surveys.
4. Use a single outrageous incident to reach an absurd conclusion. (Example: If we really want to stop the violence, we need to pass a law that requires potential golf-club wielders to submit to criminal background checks.)
5. Slant your questions to support a pre-determined conclusion.
6. Purge the data on violence perpetrated by females.
7. Refuse to approve studies that study male victimization.
8. Misconstrue the results of prior research.
9. Publish “fact sheets” that claim to debunk abuse myths, but in fact expand on them.
10. Instigate legal action against researchers who challenge the good ol’ girls network.
11. Resort to cheap-shots, name-calling, and motive-questioning.
12. Engage in strong-arm tactics.

Just as a group of brave climatologists refused to be intimidated by the global warming thugs, the family violence field has its truth-tellers as well: Murray Straus at the University of New Hampshire, Richard Gelles at the University of Pennsylvania, Michelle Carney at the University of Georgia, Miriam Ehrensaft at Columbia University, Donald Dutton at the University of British Columbia, and Denise Hines at Clark University.

All these years, the domestic violence lobby has been sullying the atmosphere with its gaseous assumptions, foggy logic, and over-heated rhetoric. When will the media blow the lid off of this story?

Why Couples Counseling Rarely Works with Abusive Women..

Why Couples Counseling Rarely Works with Abusive Women
Sunday, December 6, 2009
By Dr. Tara J. Palmatier

I receive a lot of emails and comments from men who are involved with abusive women who want to know if couples counseling will help. Many of these men have shared stories in which they recount how therapy was a waste of time, money and energy because it only emboldened and validated their wives’/girlfriends’ crazy and hurtful behaviors. Why is this so?

The Perversion of Psychology

If used properly, Psychology’s ultimate benefit is personal responsibility and freedom. At its best, it can help a person:

Become more aware of how he or she is affected by and affects others.
Make clear, conscious choices.
Strengthen their ability to say “no” to unhealthy and/or abusive situations, people and relationships and open up the possibility of new, healthy opportunities.
Set an example for others to become fully developed, conscious individuals.
Ideally, therapy is used to help an individual explore his or her past in order to understand their pain in the present. It is then the individual’s responsibility to use that awareness to make different choices, change self-limiting behaviors and free themselves from the past and unconscious forces that control them.

Unfortunately, many practitioners have allowed Psychology to become a big cop out and blame game. As a result, we now have a few generations of professional victims who take little to no responsibility for their own happiness and who blame everyone but themselves for their difficulties and misfortunes. “It’s not my fault because my parents did x, y, and z to me, so you have to excuse and put up with my bad behavior. I can’t help it.” “If you weren’t so angry, selfish, etc., I wouldn’t have to. . . insert controlling and abusive behavior here.” [*Many women who are abusive have one of the Cluster B personality disorders, which include histrionic, narcissistic, borderline and antisocial personality disorders.]

Abusive women usually fall into three categories when it comes to therapy:

1) The professional shopper. This woman is usually the one who suggests therapy because she wants to portray you as the one with the problem. She wants a “professional” to say, “Yes, Mrs. Crazypants. You’re right. Your husband is an obnoxious jerk. You’re right about everything. If you don’t criticize him and tell him what to do and how to do it every minute of the day, it will bring on the apocalypse, so by all means keep hammering away at him. You’re absolutely right to do so and he’s a defensive, overly sensitive crybaby for being upset about it. How ever do you tolerate him?”

An abusive narcissistic and/or borderline woman rarely attends therapy for her own issues because it would mean admitting she has issues. Therefore, she has a different agenda for counseling than you do. Alternatively, she may admit she has some issues, but stipulate that you need to work on your issues first because you’re the “cause” of her issues. By the time you fulfill her laundry list of grievances and it’s her turn to do some work; she ends treatment. [Please note: A good therapist doesn't let one spouse/partner hijack couples therapy like this.]

The professional shopper will often spend years dragging her husband/boyfriend from one couples therapist to the next. If she does individual “work” it usually amounts to weekly hand holding with a lame therapist who acts as cheerleader, confidante and expresses empathic statements about how much she “puts up with” and what an “angry, insensitive, unfeeling, selfish jerk” you are without challenging her or making her the focus of her own therapy. Basically, she’s buying herself a best friend with your money. Do you really want to pay for this?

2) Hell no, I won’t go! This woman refuses to go to therapy and believes it has no value. While it may be frustrating for her partner who’s desperate for relief, she’s actually demonstrating a rare moment of personal insight. She’s right. Therapy probably won’t help her. Alternately, she may have had therapy in the past and received a diagnosis she doesn’t want you to discover. She may fear her controlling, abusive behaviors will be exposed for what they are—abnormal pathology. She knows a good therapist will see through her and expose the truth.

3) Go to therapy or the relationship is over. A husband/boyfriend issues this ultimatum out of desperation and the hope of finding relief . An abusive, controlling wife/girlfriend who issues this ultimatum is looking to strengthen her control. Here’s the problem: First, if you have to issue an ultimatum in order to get your wife/girlfriend to work on the relationship and treat you with basic kindness, it doesn’t bode well for your relationship. Second, like everything else with an abusive woman, it’s about control and she certainly isn’t going to let you usurp her control even under the threat of divorce/break-up.

She may agree to go and then play games and stall in regards to choosing a therapist and scheduling a date and time or sh lead you on a merry chase, going from one shrink to the next until she can find one she “likes” (i.e., one she can control). Once you finally find a therapist who meets with her approval, she’ll spend the entire session criticizing you. If the therapist challenges her in any way, she’ll refuse to go to another session and accuse them of “siding with you,” of having an affair with you or something equally preposterous. If you were the one who issued the ultimatum, she’ll also accuse you of being the abusive control freak. There are many ways for this to blow up in your face, even though, ironically, you’re trying to save the relationship.

Why Couples Therapy Rarely Works


An abusive woman, particularly a narcissist or a borderline, typically can’t tolerate effective therapy because it puts boundaries in place and holds her accountable. In this case, therapy often degenerates into yet another vehicle to complain about and blame others, namely you. It becomes a device to a) get you to do whatever it is she wants you to do (e.g., stay in the marriage or quit asking her to get a job); b) get you to shut up and do as you’re told; and/or c) co-opt the therapist into validating her distortions, forcing you to “prove” yourself and placing the entire onus of the relationship on you.

Meanwhile, she continues to play the “Queen of Hearts,” declaring, “Off with his head!” when you inevitably displease her. The following are some key reasons why therapy rarely works with this kind of woman:

1) Ego syntonic vs. ego dystonic. Personality disorders, particularly the Cluster B personality disorders (Narcissistic, Borderline, Histrionic, Antisocial) cause the most pain and suffering to others rather than themselves. Abusive narcissistic and/or borderline women often experience negative consequences for their bad behaviors, however, they don’t see themselves as the ones with the problem. They believe they’re okay (syntonic) and blame everyone else for their problems and unhappiness. They will not connect the dots back to themselves, until their behavior becomes dystonic, i.e., they see their own behavior as the source of discomfort, pain, etc.

2) You can’t help someone who won’t admit there’s a problem. This kind of woman will readily admit that you have problems, but that doesn’t count. Therapy not only doesn’t work with an individual who takes no responsibility for her actions, it also becomes another mechanism by which this woman controls and emotionally bludgeons you.

Just like your wife/girlfriend twists the things you say and do, she’ll also twist what a therapist says—especially if the therapist holds her accountable. This woman “shops” for therapists she can use to blame and shame her husband/boyfriend into submission. The moment a therapist tries to hold her accountable, they’re denounced as a quack and she moves onto the next “expert” for hire or denounces therapy altogether and refuses to see another therapist.

Everything is about control. Controlling your reality, controlling the therapist’s perception of her and you—i.e., she’s great; you’re a boorish ogre. If she senses she’s losing control of the therapist and the session and the focus shifts to her behaviors, she’ll probably flee the scene and begin a smear campaign to devalue the therapist and/or the entire field of Psychology. She behaves this way in order to avoid having her flaws and/or pathology exposed and to avoid being held accountable.

3) Predators don’t get “better,” but they do become “better at being predators.” Predators don’t get better and they often become better predators with the help of an unwitting therapist. Bad therapy helps an abusive narcissistic or borderline woman to manipulate her partner. It helps her maintain the pattern of blame and zero accountability. It strengthens her role of the professional victim, which hides the true aggressor lying just beneath the surface.

An ineffectual and colluding therapist can also be used as an “ally.” In other words, she uses the therapist as an authority figure to beat you down. For example, “Dr Ann Abler said that you need to forgive me.” Translation: Let her get away with and forgive her abusive behavior. “Dr Ann Abler says I should do what my heart tells me to do.” Translation: I can act as badly as I want and you can’t say anything about it. “Dr Ann Abler said you need to be more sensitive to my feelings.” Translation: Tolerate her criticisms, put-downs, rages and emotional/sexual frigidity. You get the idea. Sometimes, the therapist doesn’t actually tell her any of these things. This kind of woman is masterful at twisting everything to support her distorted beliefs and demands.

Abusive predators use Psychology to engage in name-calling. They learn just enough psycho-jargon about their own pathology, but instead of recognizing the abusive behaviors, distortions and emotional issues in themselves, they project it onto everyone else. Everyone else is crazy. Everyone else is a bully. Everyone else is a narcissist or a borderline. Some of them even buy books on these topics and begin diagnosing their partners, friends, co-workers, and family.

This kind of woman also uses therapy (usually with a shrink she’s manipulated into believing her tales of adversity in the face of lesser beings such as yourself who can’t appreciate how wonderful she is and who stifles her creativity, talent, intellect, blah, blah, blah) to cloak herself in a false shield of individuation. “I’ve done my work, you haven’t. I know, you don’t. I solved my issues. Dr Ann Abler says you’re an angry person and says it’s normal not to want have sex with such an angry person.” Meanwhile, the opposite of everything she claims is true.

4) FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE AND ADMINISTER APPROPRIATE TREATMENT. Many therapists fail to detect the real problem when this kind of woman enters couples or individual therapy. Worse yet, msny therapists willfully don’t diagnose their condition and encourage the husband/boyfriend to “hang in there” and be more patient. Narcissists, borderlines, histrionis, sociopaths and your garden variety victim/bullies usually don’t improve on their own nor do they improve when you instruct the target of the abuse to jump through hoops and walk on eggshells.

These conditions only improve if they’re accurately diagnosed and the individual with the disorder undergoes a highly structured form of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Working on “communication skills,” “exercising patience” and scheduling a “weekly date night” simply doesn’t cut it. It’s like putting a band-aid on an open chest wound.

5) Couples therapy doesn’t work if there’s ongoing abuse in the relationship. Couples therapy isn’t viable if you’re in an ongoing abusive relationship. Since abusive women use therapy to continue to blame and attack, all it does is set you up to be re-victimized. If you insist on couples treatment, it’s probably better to start off with individual therapists who consult one another—that’s if the abusive spouse will attend treatment and consent to sharing information. Since most abusive types fear a loss of control and being exposed, this is highly unlikely

How Therapy Can Help You

If you’re involved with an emotionally abusive woman, you can benefit from treatment that:

Helps you decide if you want to end the relationship and, if so, how to best extricate yourself and mourn the loss.
Helps you work through your fears and worst-case scenarios about ending the relationship.
Helps you decide if you want to continue the relationship and, if so, learn how to manage and cope with her abusive behaviors.
Helps you understand what secondary gain you’re deriving from this relationship.
Helps you understand why you’re attracted to this woman and determine if you have a pattern of being attracted to abusive women.
Helps you work through these issues in order to make healthy relationship choices in the future.

by Dr Tara J. Palmatier, PsyD

Climategate: CBC finally gets it..

I did expose those liars for what they are last year I do believe. Check my sidebar for several links to the "climate warming scandal" etc..

Now we have lamestream media finally exposes that process and aptly naming Gore as one of those climate warming hysterics wallowing in lies and deception..

The singular problem with carbon reduction is that we will all die if they succeed. But what are humans worth anyway. It's better to save the planet than humans anyday. Is that not the end goal of the "warming" fanatics ?

No carbon, No life..

Twilight Struggle with the Opposite Sex is Over. Our victory is total..

Actually, I was of the opinion that the reason for the pill was just way to obvious but it allowed people to shag themselves silly without increasing the population but according to PM, there is more..
Feel the irony and the end goal of feminist ideology..

Matt Peterson: Gender Wars Are Over and Men Have Won

By Novaseeker | Thu, Dec 03 2009, 12:54 AM

From Pajamas Media comes a somewhat tongue-in-cheek article with yet much truth contained therein.

A few quotes:

Men, our long twilight struggle with the opposite sex is over. Our victory is total.

Can you believe the way things used to be? Remember when our fathers and grandfathers would drag themselves to mind-numbing jobs every day, having the sole responsibility for the feeding, clothing, and housing of their entire family?

And things were no easier before marriage, when men’s quest for sexual satisfaction was all too often hampered by the widespread moral code which taught women not to give out the “milk” for “free.”

Well, that state of affairs just wouldn’t do. So we men came together and did what we do best — formulate and implement a plan. First step, design the perfect world, the perfect male world. We decided such a world would consist of two things: less responsibility and more — and no-strings — sex.

Brothers, have we succeeded.

Indeed. And he goes on to note:

But that was only a start. To really fix things, we had to root out that old bourgeoisie mentality that had in previous times kept girls frustratingly modest and chaste. And what better way to do that than to convince women that the most reckless elements of our sexuality — the promiscuity — were in fact the correct behaviors, which had to be imitated in order for them to be “liberated”?

Amazingly, they bought that, too.

Unfortunately, our sister selves are less suited to such behavior, which can cause painful and lasting tears in the feminine soul. But no matter — we were also able to convince them that there was no such thing as a “feminine” soul, any more than there is a “masculine” soul, and that both sexes are equally suited to all things.

(Many of you said that women would never buy this, that the accumulated history of our species speaks to the deep and abiding difference between the sexes, a difference which has benefited both sides from time immemorial. But I was sanguine about our ruse — have I not been vindicated?)

…

No — it is men who now have it all.

Congratulations, brothers. Our day is at last at hand, a day of no responsibility and easy mating access as far as the eye can see. Best of all, women are convinced that they have done this themselves, and for their own good.

Sure, there are downsides. Civilization has now entered into free fall; those masterpieces of art and science and literature, for which men have been almost exclusively responsible, have ceased to issue forth from our minds and hands — and is it any wonder? Such pyrotechnics are no longer necessary to impress women, which, really, was the only reason we bothered. High culture seems a small price to pay, though, for the loosening of morals and duties which has brought our present Sex and the City-fueled bounty.

So sit back, men, and enjoy the slide. It’s Miller time.

Well done, Matt Peterson. Well done.

It’s often struck me that the past 40 or so years have been in many ways an own goal for women. Let’s see what happens next.

Tiger Woods Meets the Feminist Spin Machine..

I just love it when feminists start attacking the mens movement. It just make my day..

The reference to mensactivism.org is just great as that site has done great work and has been a presence on the web for years, thank girls..

It just displays their desperation as well as their ongoing frustration in witnessing that not all is well with the feminist pogrom..

Let's have a look at some of those outrageous statements..

Although some women surely are perpetrators, as a rule, women tend to use violence as self defense, or impulsively, not as a systematic method of control the way male abusers do.

Now this comment is supposed to come from a person of intelligence and I must query the fact that it does..

How many female murderers and abusers do we have to show to clearly demonstrate that women are vicious, callous and violent abusers..

When is the last time you read about a Father drowning his FIVE children in a bath while the others watched ?
When is the last time you read about a man skinning his wife, filleting her and serving her up as casserole to the kids ?

Both of those acts were carried out by women..

I have both those articles on this blog..

Spin much ?
Hypocrisy much ?
Lying much ?

One thing that feminists live in denial of is that women are violent in any way , shape or form but this will be their undoing as the facts are there for all to see.

A bit like that "Global Warming Scandal"...

If in doubt ?

How many times have you been abused by women, either verbally, mentaly or physically ?

By the way, you may want to remember this feminised mangina..

Jack Straton, a Portland State University expert in “the myth of the ‘battered husband syndrome.’ 

Add him to that tribunal list..

Tiger Woods Meets the Feminist Spin Machine
Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Men’s rights groups, for their part, have already made the Woods case their cause célèbre, proof of their long-held, if unsubstantiated, view that women are just as likely to abuse as men. “Of course, we could hope this will call attention to DV by women, except I think it’s illegal to say women commit DV,” wrote one sardonic commenter on Mensactivism.org. These groups have always admired Tiger because of his close relationship to his father and because of the time his daughter, Sam Alexis, jumped out of her mom’s arms and back into his. And they have used gender equality to their advantage, arguing that women can be just as powerful and manipulative as men. But in any reasonable sense, this isn’t true, argues Jack Straton, a Portland State University expert in “the myth of the ‘battered husband syndrome.’ ” Although some women surely are perpetrators, as a rule, women tend to use violence as self defense, or impulsively, not as a systematic method of control the way male abusers do. They may slap a man or throw a cup of water at him, but they’re less likely to run through the usual cycle of domestic abuse: seduce, punch, beg for forgiveness month after month. Studies that say otherwise tend to equate all acts of violence—a tear in the breast pocket, say, with a shove down the stairs.

At this point, Tiger’s only choice is to skirt gender equity and opt for chivalry. He’s already said his car accident or whatever happened was his fault, and he could elaborate just enough to make it seem as if his wife were defending herself, in which case she would be off the hook. (Of course, he’d have to do it subtly enough that he would not seem threatening—also an endorsement downer.) Under Florida law, Woods could also use the most common out for people who regret having involved the police: admit that, yes, she did hit him, but say it was an accident—which means, in this case, coming up with whatever is the golf-club equivalent of walked-into-the-door.

full article available at slate.com

You Need a Wood to Catch A Wood..

A pretty good version on the "Wood" incident but I am surprised by the racist comments by this black female. I always thought that whites were the racists and everyone else was immune..

Anyway..

Check it out..

Feminist Hyperbole: At it's best..

I don't know who the McGill Tribune or what it is and neither do I care but Carolyn Gregoire make some rather interesting statements..

Here's one..

many feminists fight for fathers' rights

Have you ever read such lies in your life before. What a total load of rubbish. Yet it also states that..

RADAR's attempt to take funding away from "discriminatory" women's-only shelters, rather than fighting for resources for male victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment,

Because feminists fight it tooth and nail you hypocrite..

Amazing how feminists and as usual the female variety justify their own sexist behaviour by claiming that men are not doing enough and yet still attack the Men's Movement for even trying..

Annoyed yet..

They are sweating, writhing and as their ludicrous and extravagant incomes will disappear once people realise the truth and the con they have perpetrated over the last forty years..

Oh dear..

Better start shopping at the local mall ducky, because we have only just started and it's not going to be pretty..

Notice the rampant claims and also the assumption that anyone really give a rats arse about feminists. We have already clearly demonstrated how corrupt and useless those shelters are thanks to Carey Roberts. Carey has written numerous articles demonstrating precisely what a sham they really are. Helping no one but themselves as this appears to be the feminist aim..

Cause chaos, distrust, mayhem and then claim victory..

This entire article is just another feminist attempt at covering up their incompetence and their male-hating intentions while covering it with their usual hyperbole..

The men's movement certainly does not want any feminist assistance or guidance as you are the enemy and it's you that declared the war..

Finally, have a read of this..

As feminist Gloria Anzaldua suggests, "Men, even more than women, are fettered to gender roles … We need a new masculinity and the new man needs a movement."

Fascinating is it not. On the one hand they claim to be for men and on the other they do everything possible to destroy us..

We need feminist assistance like we need Iran to have Nuclear Bombs..

You have got to be kidding me..

"The fight for men's rights"

McGill Tribune

Carolyn Gregoire | Published: 12/1/09

http://media.www.mcgilltribune.com/media/storage/paper234/news/2009/12/01/Opinion/Off-The.Board.The.Fight.For.Mens.Rights-3842224.shtml

Discrimination against men has, understandably perhaps, never occupied a prominent position on the feminist agenda. Recently, however, the rise of the men's rights movement has led men's rights groups and feminists alike to call issues specific to male identity into question. A recent article on Slate's women-oriented webzine DoubleX entitled "Men's Rights Groups are Becoming Frighteningly Effective" has spurred contentious debate extending beyond the feminist blogosphere as to whether feminism should encompass issues of men's rights.

The article was triggered by the actions of men's activist group RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting) who gathered in Washington this October to lobby against issues such as false allegations of rape and domestic violence, unrecognized domestic violence against men, and child custody rights for divorced fathers.

Many women, and not only those who identify as feminists, are outraged by the measures these groups have taken. Rather than addressing the negative impact that patriarchy and gender stereotypes have on men and calling for change, RADAR chooses instead to undermine the prevalence of rape and domestic violence against women. Relying on hyperbolic claims and sensationalism - suggesting, for instance, that domestic violence laws represent "the largest regression in civil rights since the Jim Crow era" - RADAR succeeded in blocking the passage of several domestic violence bills, such as the Violence Against Women act. It is also worth noting that many of the movement's leaders are themselves accused batterers.

Though issues of men's rights and injustice towards men deserve attention, the anti-feminist approach employed by RADAR and many other men's rights groups in battling these issues is counterproductive and alarmingly reactionary. RADAR's attempt to take funding away from "discriminatory" women's-only shelters, rather than fighting for resources for male victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment, epitomizes this ineffectual methodology.

While it's true that all human rights are men's rights and that history is essentially a men's rights movement, discrimination against men should be a feminist concern because male and female rights are inextricably intertwined. Though a patriarchal society operates for male benefit, societal standards of masculinity are also harmful to men in real ways which deserve to be acknowledged. Rigid definitions of masculinity which narrowly cast men into aggressive, machismo, bread-winning roles are damaging to men, and further, they are damaging to men in ways that are also damaging to women. Following this line of reasoning, many feminists fight for fathers' rights as a means of countering the socially sanctioned notion that nurturer or caregiver must be a female-occupied role. A central objective of the feminist movement is debunking gender stereotypes, even when they apply only to men.

Male victims of sexual harassment, domestic violence, and rape deserve to be recognized and taken seriously, mothers should not be unjustly favoured over fathers in child custody proceedings, and individuals of both genders do not deserve to be systemically limited and harmed by rigid social definitions of masculinity. Feminist concerns and men's rights are not mutually exclusive, and should meet on the common ground of seeking gender equality - the irony of it all is that we're both fighting the same battle. As feminist Gloria Anzaldua suggests, "Men, even more than women, are fettered to gender roles … We need a new masculinity and the new man needs a movement."

Hate Mail: Number 2420..

Amazing how these haters can so conveniently make up any information they like and then proceed to attack on their own induced hysteria..

She does mention food, I wouldn't have to guess too hard to determine it's carbon footprint..

First they ignore you etc...

From:
"Elayna"

To:
"christian J"
I bet you really had to get to lengths to look that up. Project much, toots?
You men's rights freaks are so laughable. A lot of silly, moral cowards who
need to blame women all the time. Yawn.

I don't hate, sweets, I'm not a bitter failure like you and yours. Hmmm,
what sick things did YOUR daddy do to you to make you so twisted and sick?
Seriously, that fucker seems to have screwed you up for life. Blame that
stupid louse, not women.

Get professional help, hon, you are crying for it. Or rather, work harder in
life and intelligent, well-rounded women wouldn't show you up at every turn
in the road.

Bitter because life hasn't handed you everything because you have a penis?
LOL Grow up, you arse.

Transient Global Amnesia (TGA): I Think I Was Raped..maybe..

Now here is an interesting study that may even throw some light on the " I was raped last night" claims that women falsely make the morning after..

Interesting how once again the feminist mindset that dictates that wommin have the right to claim they were raped or assaulted if they recall the following morning that "something" happened or they were either too drunk to remember jumping into the sheets voluntarily or were possibly coerced..

That it's more from guilt than anything else is yet to be determined..

But any female can make that claim to any court or police and have that Man arrested, life ruined and automatically jailed ..

Ahh ! memories..

Make them up as you go..

FoxSexpert: Sex-Related Amnesia - Can It Happen to You?

Monday, November 30, 2009

By Yvonne Fulbright

You just had the most incredible sex of your life. Only you can’t remember it. Sounds like a sick joke, but forgetting the absolutely unforgettable is a real occurrence.

Lovers have been known to blank out on entire sexual experiences, having no recollection of the event or their orgasmic responses.

What exactly is this phenomenon? And could it ever happen to you?

Sexual amnesia can happen to anyone, and most unexpectedly. Did you and your lover really have sex this morning or is your sweetie pulling your leg? Why do you have no recollection of that night of passion? What exactly happened with the hottie you brought home last night?

In many of these baffling cases, alcohol or drugs aren’t to blame. But you can point the finger at another culprit. Well-described in medical literature since 1956, transient global amnesia (TGA) is known as "recurrent coital amnesia" when it is triggered by sex. During such sudden, temporary memory loss, a person’s ability to recall recent events and new information totally disappears.

Suddenly, you can’t remember where you are or how you got there. You do know who you are, and can recognize and name the familiar, including your sexual partner (unless you just met). You just can’t remember what happened during this memory impairment and possibly anything that happened several hours before its onset.

So what brought on this state? Surprisingly, this rare, short-lived phenomenon isn’t due to a neurological condition, like epilepsy or stroke, or recent head injury. Instead, TGA is typically traced to a stressful emotional or physical event. These include:

— Hard physical exertion;

— Sudden cold or hot water immersion;

— Overwhelming emotional distress from bad news, conflict or working too hard;

— Medical procedures, like an endoscopy (a minimally invasive medical procedure);

— Sexual intercourse.

With sex in particular, TGA is typically triggered after climax. Medical practitioners have also noticed that using the Valsalva method -- a discouraged sex move involving squeezing the pelvic floor muscles while pressing down, as though having a bowel movement -- precedes TGA in some males.

Sex-related or not, one thing all of these factors have in common is a sudden lack of blood flow to the brain. Brain scans indicate that blood flow to areas of the brain involving memory appears disrupted during TGA. And any time blood flow is restricted to the brain, a person’s ability to record new memory is severely impaired.

Because it cannot be distinguished from other life-threatening conditions, immediate medical attention needs to be sought when TGA strikes during or after intercourse. Dead giveaways that something is wrong include babbling, apparent confusion and repeatedly asking questions about ongoing events like "What are we doing?" or "What time of year is it?"

When asked by their partner or later by a doctor, they’re unable to correctly answer questions like "Who is the president?" or "What year is it?" Equally perplexing, however, is the fact that one’s vocabulary and movement are not impaired. There is no clouded consciousness.

Other symptoms may include headache, nausea, vomiting, anxiety, agitation, dizziness, chills, fear of dying, "pins-and-needles" sensation, trembling, sweating, visual disturbance, racing heartbeat, cold hands and feet, and great emotionality.

TGA episodes last an average of six hours (going for no more than 24 hours), with one’s memory returning gradually. Thankfully, all indicators are that a person’s memory is OK afterward, and the TGA has apparently done no damage. One’s immediate recall ability appears to be preserved.

TGA is equal opportunity when it comes to sex and race, but those over 49 are at higher risk of experiencing this sudden memory loss. Physical events tend to precipitate TGA in men, while emotional events, a history of anxiety, or pathological personality are more associated with women.

While the underlying cause is unknown, a history of migraines is a prime suspect for any individual. Experiences with migraines or coital headaches (sex headaches) have been linked to some who experience TGA.

Overall, incidence in the U.S. is 5.2 cases per 100,000 individuals. Interestingly, this is higher than incidence estimates in Alcoi, Spain, which is at 2.9 cases per 100,000, but lower than the 10 cases per 100,000 in Belluno, Italy. While the annual recurrence is low, over one’s lifetime, recurrence can be as high as 24 percent, which may work to your advantage.

After all, almost any lover is open to a good excuse when it comes to rationalizing having done anything regrettable. TGA may just be the perfect fib for that unfortunate time you forget your partner’s birthday, anniversary or seemingly most amazing sex session.


Dr. Yvonne K. Fulbright is a sex educator, relationship expert, columnist and founder of Sexuality Source Inc. She is the author of several books including, "Touch Me There! A Hands-On Guide to Your Orgasmic Hot Spots."

Women are happier: No, wasn't that Men last week ?

I think there is something at play here. Jealousy maybe or even another attempt by feminists determined to ensure that women are never seen as less in any way, shape or form..

It's pathetic really..

The "Women SEEM happier" statement appears to be somewhat neutral would you not agree..

Good old University research, can always count on them wallowing in that feminist agitprop..

Link to one of my blog entries showing the opposite..

Is this getting tacky or what ?

Study: Women Outdo Men in the Pursuit of Happiness

Monday, November 30, 2009

Women are happier than men — but only by 15 minutes a day.

That's the latest theory in a new analysis of how much pleasure we get out of life.

Both sexes enjoy watching television and hanging around the house. However, men have more "negative" time during their day, according to Social Policy Research Center fellow, Dr. Roger Patulny, from the University of New South Wales in Australia.

"If you add up all the times together — the good times and the bad times — men have about 10 minutes less time that they enjoy than women in a day and six minutes more time that they dislike," he said.

Both men and women liked their leisure — looking after children and voluntary work — but women did more of those pleasurable activities.

"Women tend to enjoy the things that they do with their time more than men do," Patulny said.

The biggest negative for women was housework: 90 minutes of it every day.

Men only did about 50 minutes of unenjoyable chores, but they also endured more "bad" time in paid work and commuting.

"Women seem happier," Patulny added.

A Woman confesses to lying about domestic violence..

It is no too often, as a matter of fact quite rare for the doctor to even bother exposing the damage false accusations of domestic violence has on the victim. His preferrence in the past was to follow the Oprah mentality of "find the female victim"..

Here we have a woman that lied in court in order to jail her ex. for 10 months just to gain an advantage in the divorce proceedings..

The courts will automatically accept a woman's lying testimony without proof on any event without question, all thanks to that sexist, biased and illegal VAWA policy, feminist introduced hysteria as well as their interference to jurisprudence..

Will this woman be charged with willfully perverting the course of justice ?

Wrong lifetime, right anatomy..

Link to DrPhil's site for video on confession..

Justice Official Gives Thanks for Bias and Bigotry..

As we have witnessed so many times in the past, feminists persistently lie, exaggerate and just ignore any situation or issues that one half of the population faces. If it ain't happening to women then nothing is happening at all. Feminists constantly rage on about violence only happening to women which demonstrates clearly their blatant sexism as well as creating even more hysteria than necessary.

More hysteria equals more funds and more funds means the ability to raise that hysteria to an even greater level..

Sadly, lying or exaggerating is not restricted to the general public. Now we have public servants raising the bias..

Catherine.Pierce@usdoj.gov

Maybe a few words to the above bigot may have some affect, who knows !

Justice Official Gives Thanks for Bias and Bigotry
Sunday, November 29, 2009
By Carey Roberts

Last week we were jolted with the news that the global warming crisis is a hoax, an ideologically-driven scam based on data that have been routinely doctored, selectively presented, and when necessary, furtively disposed of.

But there’s another global disinformation campaign that is still going strong. It’s called the Cult of Domestic Violence. This ruse threatens the very foundation of American society: the traditional family.

This past Thursday Catherine Pierce, acting director of the Department of Justice Office of Violence Against Women, issued a Thanksgiving message – now that sounds comforting, doesn’t it?

Ms. Pierce called for “a national conversation about violence against women and teen dating abuse. The Department of Justice will also dedicate this day to talk about ways to end the violence against women and girls that pervades every community in America.”

Those sentences contain two very generous helpings of Ms.-Information.

First, domestic violence does not “pervade” every community in America. In fact, among couples in intact, married relationships, partner violence is essentially non-existent. Yes, intimate partner aggression lurks in some corners, but it is concentrated in low-income, substance-abusing couples not connected by the bonds of marriage.

Second, domestic abuse is not limited to violence against women. There is also a substantial level of female-perpetrated violence against men that goes unreported to the police. All the research shows women are equally likely to aggress, whether it’s a slap-the-cad rebuke or a teach-you-a-lesson knee to the groin.

For example, the Centers for Disease Control reports 8.9% of adolescent males are victims of dating violence each year, compared to an almost identical number – 8.8% — of adolescent females.

And let’s not purge our memory banks of the tragedy of former NFL star quarterback Steve McNair, shot four times in the chest this past July by his ex-girlfriend as he lay asleep.

So how does Ms. Pierce’s one-sided Thanksgiving proclamation embrace mean-spirited bigotry?

Because when gobble-gobble statistics are floated before an unsuspecting public, persons begin to believe the lies. Segments of the population become stereotyped and demonized.

Laws are eventually passed that eliminate persons’ fundamental civil liberties – just consider all the states that have passed “mandatory arrest” laws that shred Constitutional guarantees of probable-cause. Once a man is saddled with an arrest record, it becomes a cinch to tar him with the abuser label and take away his children.

Just as the global warming religion has come under scrutiny in recent years, a growing number of persons have begun to question the rigid orthodoxy that envelopes the domestic violence industry.

On October 1, President Obama issued a proclamation that highlighted the plight of both male and female survivors of abuse: “Domestic violence touches the lives of Americans of all ages, leaving a devastating impact on women, men, and children of every background and circumstance.”

Three weeks later Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL) declared on the House floor, “When we think of domestic violence, we think of the women as being the victims. But it’s also men victimized as well. Male victims are less likely to report the violence, and seek services due to the stigma associated with being a male victim or not being believed.”

And on Tuesday December 1, WETV will be airing its latest installment of Secret Lives of Women. The promo reads, “The fact is however, that more than a third of all DA [domestic abuse] cases feature males as victims, and even that number is considered low due to the relatively low reporting of these cases by men who are ashamed and afraid to do so.”

Maybe we should all encourage OVW director Catherine Pierce to tune in: Catherine.Pierce@usdoj.gov . The last thing our families need is half-baked holiday greetings foisted upon us by self-serving government bureaucrats.

When is a pedophile not a pedophile ? When it's a woman..

So, when is a pedophile not a pedophile ?
Apparently it's "different" when women sexually abuse children for some reason only known to themselves, the media and the courts. The law seems very hesitant and the main stream media feels it necessary to avoid that as much as they can, cannot have women being accused of being sexual deviots, now can we.

Maybe the meaning has changed. Maybe it only applies to my sex. Maybe the dictionary offers a different "better" explaination ?

ped·o·phile (pěd'ə-fīl', pē'də-)
n. An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.

The dictionary version seems quite clear to me but as usual there must be another explanation for the privileged sex to

she said, began with kissing and progressed to acts of oral and digital sex.

Interestingly both those actions does not a pedophile, much !!

In a another interesting display of lesbian affection we have the "Vagina Monologue" version of child rape by plying her with alcohol just to get laid..
Another issue that did not escape my notice, there is no mention of the child's age. I wonder why ?
Why does lamestream media ignore or maybe just edit that out for some inexplicable reason..

Teacher Leonie Pech had sex with female student - prosecutors
Article from:
SEAN FEWSTER, COURT REPORTER
November 30, 2009 11:30am

A MUSIC teacher had sex with a female student in her home and in a classroom during their lesbian affair, a court has heard.

The District Court was today told Leonie Beverly Pech - author of a report on "grabbing truant students through music'' - repeatedly kissed, fondled and had sex with a teenage girl during their 22-month relationship.

One of their trysts allegedly occurred in a parked car somewhere in West Lakes, after the couple attended a Rolling Stones concert.

Prosecutor Emily Telfer said the pair's illicit bond was forged during after-school rehearsals and "individual performances'' that were supposed to help the girl win a $500 music prize.

"In 1995, Pech wrote the girl five or six letters signed 'WY','' Ms Telfer said.

"When the girl asked what the letters stood for, Pech replied they meant 'I wuv you'.''

Pech, 42, of Prospect, today pleaded not guilty to two counts of indecent assault and seven counts of unlawful sexual intercourse.

Opening the trial, Ms Telfer said the girl began studying music with Pech in 1992.

By 1994, Pech was "paying special attention'' to the girl, offering her private after-school rehearsals and "individual performances''.

Their intimate contact, she said, began with kissing and progressed to acts of oral and digital sex.

One instance allegedly occurred when Pech barricaded the door of the school's music room with a chair, then sat upon it with the girl on her lap.

"On another occasion, Pech brought a television into her bathroom so she and the girl could watch television together,'' Ms Telfer said.

"Pech offered the girl a drink she called a Black Russian.''

Ms Telfer said the girl suffered occasional panic attacks during the relationship, which ended in 1996.

"The girl's feelings began to change when she discovered letters in Pech's house,'' she said.

"Those letters suggested Pech had relationships with students before the girl, and she was therefore not as special as she had thought.''

Ms Telfer said the girl informed another teacher of the affair in 1997, but was visited by an "agitated'' Pech.

"She told the girl that the other teacher had said she was never to make those allegations again, and was not to speak to Pech again,'' she said.

The trial, before Judge Rosemary Davey in the absence of a jury, is continuing