And so it continues..
How Misguided Feminism Prevents Relationships
Thursday, May 6, 2010
By Pelle Billing
Do men avoid dating successful women? It certainly seems to be a common perception, and British writer Zoe Lewis is so sure of the phenomenon that she claims to understand why men won’t date successful women. According to Lewis, one of her former boyfriends explicitly broke up with her due to her intelligence and professional success:
He told me that he just didn’t want to go out with a woman who was clever and successful. He said it meant that I could never let any discussion go, or concede a flawed argument; I had to solve problems when they arose, and would argue political points with him.
Apparently Zoe Lewis cannot take a hint. The problem quite obviously was not her intelligence nor her success, but the fact that she would never let any discussion go or concede a flawed argument. That kind of behavior has nothing to do with being clever or successful, it is simply the behavior of an obnoxious person!
Let us have a look at another of Lewis’ examples of how men supposedly cannot handle a strong woman:
I invited my new boyfriend to see me perform my one-woman show on stage in London. Before he walked in to the play, we were tactile and it struck me that I had high hopes for the relationship.
An hour later, after watching me on stage and then networking with a group of high-powered theatre people at the aftershow party, he became distant.
Of course he became distant! You invited him to come with you and then you proceeded to ignore him. If you wanted to be able to network freely then it would have been better not to bring a date. Why are you blaming him for becoming distant when you are the one who ignored him first?
The problem here is not that she is a strong and intelligent person, the problem is that she tries too hard to be strong and independent. A relationship cannot be about independence only, if it is, then there is no actual relating going on. How can you form a relationship without vulnerability and connecting to your partner?
Surpringly, Lewis seems to have grasped some of these insights, in spite of her inability to correctly interpret why men pull away from her:
Modern women have learned to regard men as the competition, in order to get ahead professionally. And while men can accept this female aggression in the workplace, they evidently can’t in relationships.
Why would you want to be aggressive towards a man you’re dating? And why would you expect men to accept female aggression in a relationship? These expectations are absurd, and I’m happy that you’ve finally figured out what should have been self-evident.
These days I try to focus less on the flaws of feminism, and more on the potential in educating people about men’s issues. However, in this case I cannot help but blame feminism. Why else would a woman have these strange ideas about relationships? Common sense tells us that being cold, argumentative and aggressive is a lousy strategy for having a nurturing relationship, and yet this seems to be exactly what the writer has pursued in her dating life.
Towards the end of her article, the writer comes up with the most odd quote of them all:
Men love vulnerable women. We need to accept that, just because we’ve changed, we can’t expect them to. I don’t think they can.
So we cannot expect men to start liking cold, argumentative and aggressive women? Wow, that is a surprise. Do you as a woman like men who are cold, argumentative and aggressive? If not, then why do you expect men to like that kind of behavior in you?
Personally, I believe that men and women (on average) have some different preferences when looking for a relationship. Men place more importance on looks and softness, and women on status and confidence. But there are a lot of similarities too, especially when looking for a long term mate. Men and women alike appreciate a partner who is warm, relaxed and not overtly aggressive.
How can these common sense insights have been lost? The only answer I can come up with is that misguided feminism has taught a generation of women that men are opponents and not allies. This insight makes me tremendously sad.
Pelle Billing is an M.D. who writes and lectures about men’s issues and gender liberation beyond feminism.
7 comments:
This is another clueless woman who thinks men want competitors for relationships. And her perspectives betray a frightening lack of common sense about relationships. She might have more in common relationship-wise with another aggressive woman than most men.
When you say "the golfer," are you referring to that blowhard neocon Rush? Just curious.
"Do you as a woman like men who are cold, argumentative and aggressive?"
Yes, yes they do.
What seems difficult to understand at first is easy to grasp when you realize that these women are aping the behaviors THEY FIND ATTRACTIVE in men, in order to try to attract men.
It's a fairly idiotic mating strategy,evolutionarily-speaking, so perhaps they will die off. I hope so, because they're too fucked up in the head to understand the idea that heterosexual males are not attracted to male sexual display patterns.
"Anonymous said...
When you say "the golfer," are you referring to that blowhard neocon Rush? Just curious."
No, neither was I referring to that marxist, left wing lunatic Obama either..
-my bad! I was skimming over the article. After reading it again, I realize you mean Tigergina and his violent - soon to be - ass raping him in divorce kourt - ex. What's really sickening to me is the reaction many women had about princess's violent outburst, in that high-five-you-go-girl mode (yak).
As for my comment about that *other* golfer, the last thing in the world I am is an Obama fan! I've seen the Marxist ass-hats ruining America for decades. Folks didn't listen to me back in the day. Now they're wondering why the West has fallen so far. Many black MRAs were trying to warn black men during the '08 election that Obama is not their friend and Biden is their outright enemy (and that of all us men with his unconstitutional VAWA!). Anyway, just wanted to clarify.
My comments against Rush (blowhard), Hannity (Wallbanger), and O'Reily (Leprichan) have more to do with their fake conservatism as well as their endorsement for RINOs. that's all. God bless the MRA/MGTOW/Ghost Nation of which I am gradually becomming a ghost.
The relationships didn't work because they were incompatible. It has nothing to do with feminism. I am amazed that someone actually said it.. On this blog. You proved my point for me. "Anonymous" attributed being cold, argumentative, and aggressive to being a MAN---by writing a cold, argumentative, aggressive statement about WOMEN! In which he, and I'm guessing it's a he, refers to women as "fucked up" and wishes for them to die.
(Which is psychotic)
Well, shouldn't you be happy that more and more women are beginning to act like men--like you? You should have more in common, right?
"scarletbelle said...
The relationships didn't work because they were incompatible. It has nothing to do with feminism. I am amazed that someone actually said it."
I am amazed, as everyone else is at the constant denial by feminists to be held responsible for anything negative. You belong and promote a male-hating doctrine, so prevalent that anyone can detect this as a known and demonstrated fact. Yet, constant denial. Time to grow up and except the fact that feminism caused more damage than it tried to repair..
Post a Comment