DV Debate: Paul Elam against Feminist, David Futrelle..

This debate quite rightly covers the area of "women are the only victims" as feminists have always blindingly stated. As you will read, the blatant bias in domestic violence research is not denied even by researchers but the feminist version simply exclude any mention of "female on male violence" as being insignificant and according to their "philosophy"(sic), unnecessary.

Paul's excellent "body of work", demonstrates clearly how feminist methodology and misinformation can be so easily rendered useless and tossed into pages of history as lies, irrelevant and basically a complete waste of time and efforts. Discrediting the researchers and belittling their efforts.

Links to "A Voice For Men" and the Great DV Debate..

Sadly, the whimsical, feminist Futrelle, as All feminists have done in the past when confronted with their own lies and deceptions, they run and head for cover. They are well aware of the fact that their doctrine cannot withstand the blowtorch of truth or even the light of day..

These are the cowards we are up against. Their typical attack regimen in the past consisted precisely what Ghandi stated about the affects of confronting anyone with an argument that they refuse to even consider. First they ignore you but the Men's movement is getting way too big to do that, then they ridicule you and feminists have that down to a fine art and finally they attack you and feminists are ignorant and stupid enough to believe that they are blameless and totally justified by their adherence to an ill-conceived, demonstratively biased, sexist, hate doctrine..

Not to take away from Paul's excellent debate but just to add to the blatant bias that has filtered through the western countries regarding false reporting of DV..

It was for the same reason that Amfortas and I produced these MP3's, exposing the biased "woman centered" research in Australia..

Amfortas & Christian J Lying about Domestic Violence Part 1 by amfortas1

The ‘woman’s Safety Survey’ was “uncorroborated, biased and manipulated” ‘Advocacy research’ orchestrated by the Office for the Status of Women and passed off as Bureau of Statistics report. It caused an enormous row, says MRA Amfortas. Manipulated definitions and hysterical claims copied from America made innocuous behaviour criminal. DV sells commercial products to women and expropriates public funds for the fastest growing ‘Industry in Australia.

Amfortas & Christian J Lying about Domestic Violence Part 2 by amfortas1

Three other sources of ‘official’ data which are routinely manipulated and presented to support DV lies are analysed by Amfortas and compared to Independent University research which completely contradicts the ‘official message’.” It would be generous to think that this manipulation and bias was just the result of incompetence. But as we can see there is something far darker behind it. It is corruption. It is deliberate.”