Here we have feminists trying to re-align their male-hate doctrine..
Don’t rebrand feminism, reclaim itThe arrogance and ignorance stated above just demonstrates that feminists do actually live in a self-induced mindset and cocoon of their own design, where they are of the opinion that they can save their propaganda machine and just continue with their hate doctrine like nothing is actually wrong with it..
Negative stereotypes of feminism, their internalisation by many of us in our daily lives, and attempts to rebrand feminism to make it more palatable are all missing the mark, writes Kristin Aune.
No Link..
They are mystified as to why anyone, be it male or female, have no wish to wallow in their disruptive and society destroying mantra.
Don’t rebrand feminism, reclaim it
Declared dead, irrelevant, unfashionable, yet simultaneously responsible for a host of social ills, feminism has a bad rep.
In fact, feminism’s image in the mainstream media has been pretty awful over the last decade or so.
Honestly, they actually wonder why ?
The non-feminist women explained that they thought of feminists as: 1) unfeminine; 2) man-haters; and 3) lesbians. Stereotypes of dungarees, rugby shirts, hairy legs, short hair, a so-called ‘ugly’ appearance and, predictably, bra-burning (a long-held allusion to an event which never actually happened) accompanied their explanations.
I know, they are at a loss as to why they have that reputation and even states the following response that even a child could answer..
And yet when asked to give examples of feminists they knew who fitted this description, no one could.
To answer that comment one only has to flick through some of the articles on this blog or just Google that question to receive an overwhelming response as to why feminists are indeed viewed as the obnoxious version that they deny to be.
Here is just one example..
quote..."Lesbianism allows you to explore feminism"....
But ofcourse that just touches the surface of their misandry, their downright malicious attitude and spiteful doctrine aimed at both sexes, having already achieved notoriety and demonstrated clearly to be what they really are as even they stated in the opening statement yet they still want to maintain that malicious attitude without making any changes to their fake hype and misinformation regimen.
Even articles like this are ignored..
Page Three Girls and porn-again feminists
Feminism has always had a contradictory attitude towards sex, combining demands for sexual liberation with a prudish, pursed-lips disapproval of heterosexual relationships. The focus on the problem of men has always concealed two fundamental truths: that men and women have far more common interests and problems than those that divide them, and that men and women like each other.Yes, again another female journalist against the feminasties, and in their reduced perception they would be falsely considered the writer to be one of them, except that the writer obviously does not consider that to be the case at all. Feminists have always assumed to represent women "et al" but in actual case that has never ever been the case. Even "NOW" (National Org Of W...) claimed to represent over 500,000 members but when it came to quantify that lie, they refused to supply any information and later comments by previous members determined that it may have only been a tenth of that amount (feminists are compulsive liars as we all know).
So they continue in their irrelevance and with their soul destroying practises without even recognising or admitting that they are indeed finished and their time is limited, they can see that inevitable outcome on the horizon as more and more people speak out about their "crimes against society"..
2 comments:
Seems like the snowball theory and it's inevitable conclusion of collapsing under it's own weight. I'm glad this fad is wearing thin and wearing out.
539
Feminism's effects on women can be likened to the way my brother tried to discipline his female pet cat. Whenever she took a dump under the kitchen table, he would swat her with a rolled up newspaper. This caused her to engage in more of the behavior.
The women in the video were horrid and feminism thrives on a kind of sour grapes approach: As their behavior and selfish attitude turns off men, they let themselves go to demonstrate they "don't need men" and then this behavior feeds back into itself.
Feminism sought first and foremost to goodie grab the most important stuff men had: Namely, a paycheck. Men know, however, that a paycheck isn't really his own. After you take out taxes and expenses, not a lot is left over to have "fun" with.
Feminism promised normal women the notion that they could have a hobby job and get paid as much as a man and then still marry a man to support her. In addition, she wouldn't have to live up to any traditional standards such as cooking and cleaning and being emotionally supportive but he should open her doors and praise her as a lady. In other words, feminism promised mainstream women the right to be a b*tch.
Back in the 70's and 80's, many women could be feminists and double dip. Many were quite attractive. But today, there's a plethora of attractive women with highly paid careers and a shortage of men with ready wallets to pay for things. So women who are man-haters out the door wind up staying at home late night griping that men are just so "shallow" and "only care about looks" and aren't "romantic". So they give up. That's what you see in the video.
We are now at the point where we need to question fundamental feminist dogma: Not just anti-male government policies and entitlements for women, but rather whether women should have workplace and even voting equality while still being treated as helpless damsels in distress.
The women in this video would last about 10 seconds in a middle eastern country before putting on a burka. It's just a matter of chivalrous men no longer protecting and handholding them while they bash us.
Post a Comment