Newsweek's Jess Twins demonstrating their anti-male prejudice..

As Paul states in his article and response to another "Newsweek" feminist rant one must wonder where "equality" arises in feminist doctrine. One would be of the opinion now that feminism has succeeded in indoctrinating the general public, they would encourage Men to start standing up for themselves, "you go for it guys, we can see how you have been screwed". Not likely apparently. Their usual incoherent ranting can now be read with rapt attention as we have already witnessed their pyrrhic victory..
One would imagine that their attitude would at least take a second to consider the damage that catering to victim-hood may induce in future (as did the "Spin Sisters" of New York in the last decade) but not Meme-Jess and Mini-Jess (Jessica Bennett and Jesse Ellison). No, that would take character, dignity and even a small level of comprehension when confronted with an issue they fear so much their response is akin to witnessing two children planting a fart cushion on their great aunt's chair and watching from behind the couch, waiting to snigger, hand over mouth..

Feminists and especially feminised female journalists very rarely argue any point of fact but prefer to avoid any direct argument as they know they do not have a leg to stand on when it comes down to denying all men their natural rights..

Journalism was once a respected and hallowed profession and I am glad to see there are still the odd professional taking that responsibility seriously. But ever since the flood gate was opened to politically indoctrinated gnomes, biased male-hating feminist with non-credentials, we wonder if journalism should be recast as a story-telling/opinionated/feelings past-time rather than what it is really supposed to be, delivering facts, independent viewpoint developed by sound research and taking non-partisan viewpoint; would appear to have been severely downgraded if not totally ignored. The end result are the Jess twins, twisted, huge chip on their shoulder and incapable of impartiality..

Why do you believe feminists are so threatened by one single meeting that only seeks to balance gender inequality. There are "women's studies" programs floated by taxpayers dollars so why not a men's studies course equivalent ?

Paul Elam's Article..(sample)

Well, they actually did have some assistance. For expert analysis, the duo secured the opinion of the cabbie who dropped them at the conference. She expounded on the concept of male studies with an incisive cackle, and punctuated her expertise by throwing back her head as she laughed.

And the link to Male Studies: A New Academic Discipline

The subject, Male Studies: A New Academic Discipline, brings the world's leading scholars together to discuss Male Studies at the university level. For information on this important event, and how to register, click here.

Duke University "Needs to Know": 90% of students reported never experiencing dating violence.

Some more studies concerning date violence and general violence against both sexes  here...
for your information. Just to keep you updated with factual, peer-reviewed studies that is undeniable and guess what ?

Over 90% of students reported never experiencing dating violence.

Just like the global warming scam has been exposed so will feminists be exposed for the corrupt liars they are. Duke University must be looking even more stupid as they are trying to convince parents that "date violence and date rape" is so rampant that all male students should automatically be listed as incorrigible instigators, be denied natural justice (automatically guilty) on the sole reason for not possessing a vagina..

Feminists have blatantly promoted that women do not indulge in or act out, any acts of violence as they have always avoided answering that or just denied it, concentrating solely on vilifying all men and generalising at will..

	SUMMARY:  This bibliography examines 271 scholarly investigations: 211 empirical studies and 60 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 365,000.

 This is not really what any government department or politician wants to know about. That would clearly demonstrate their anti-male bias, their obvious sexism and would clearly explain their pandering to feminist hysteria..

Ackard, D. M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2002).
Date violence and date rape among adolescents: associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health.  Child Abuse; Neglect, 26, 455-473.
(A Minnesota statewide school sample of 81,247 students;(40,301 boys, 40,946 girls)) in the 9th and 12th grade responded to the question of whether they ever experienced date related violence.

Over 90% of students reported never experiencing dating violence.  In terms of grades, (3.3%) of 9th grade girls and (2.8%) of 9th grade boys reported experiencing violence, while (5.5%) of 12th grade girls and (2.3%) of 12th grade boys reported experiencing violence.

In terms of ethnicity, American Indian boys; (7.1%) and African American boys;(7.2%) reported experiencing higher rates of dating violence than American Indian girls; (6.8%) and African American girls; (3.6%)

Let's Get Real, Ladies..

Let's get real, ladies..

One of Paul's more viral efforts. One of those educational videos women just do not want know about or listen to..

The truth rarely tells you what you want to hear..

Walk a Mile in His Shoes For a Change...

A couple of articles for your perusal and comment. Both from M.a.n's very good and interesting site. May be worthwhile your while to sign up for the almost daily updates on articles and other bits from around the world..
I have to agree with the footwear interpretation as it does nothing more than marginalize ALL men and boys, making women the only victims worth bothering about and ofcourse in the process everyone else suffers..

I wonder which male-hating doctrine and complying organizers come up with that one ?

Maybe someone could come up with some facts on their names and don't forget the companies that sponsor such as well.

The second article has got to be my favourite as it totally contradicts the first article. While feminists busy themselves trying to close ALL "women" prisons as they live in denial that the privileged sex does not raise a hand against anyone, they may confess to raising an eyebrow, probably while they are at that hate rally below..

Walk a Mile in Her Shoes Campaign Couldn’t Walk Three Feet in His

By Men's Activism News | Wed, Apr 07 2010, 

Excerpt:

'Each April we expose another generation to the “light hearted” spectacle of grown men in high heels, leading a parade to help break the silence about how “1 in 6 women” are violently sexually assaulted by men. Men should “walk in women’s shoes” is the theme of April as “Sexual Assault Awareness Month” an event calling attention to how women are hobbled by both fashion and by the evil patriarchy. 

... 

There is not even a hint that women ever commit serious acts of violence including the sexual abuse of children. It’s just a Politically Correct event hammering home the point that girls and women suffer because men are evil. It’s not a parade, it’s a charade. And it crosses the line into hate as surely as if the marchers were wearing sheets and pointed white hoods. Never in all the years of asking men to walk in women’s shoes have we asked women to walk in men’s shoes. That too would be politically incorrect.'

Russia: Violent crimes by women increase

By Men's Activism News | Wed, Apr 07 2010, 

Story here. Excerpt:

'Moscow: Crimes committed by women, particularly theft and crimes of passion, have risen sharply in Russia, reflecting an alarming trend, a top law official has said.

About 49,000 women convicts are at present imprisoned in 46 female prisons in the country.

"I would like to point out an alarming trend: female crime has been steadily on the rise," Russia's Deputy Prosecutor General Yevgeny Zabarchuk said Tuesday.

According to statistics, the most "popular" crimes committed by women in Russia are theft, drug trafficking and crimes of passion.'

So much for the myth that female criminals are less violent as compared to men.

Dealing with Feminist Religious Hyperbole..

Do not criticise Feminism is the equivalent to "Never criticise a Woman" in it's usual emotive and celebrated "MeME". Criticism is foreign to feminists as feminism has never been open to public debate or critical discussion. This has only ever eventuated due to the Web, to such an extent that Feminists tried their hardest to close down Men's/MRA Sites and any site that dared to call Feminism to account. Those debates are now left to some brave MRA's refusing to accept the bias, disinformation, blatant half-truths and lies favoured by those harpies blinded by self-interest and as the Dictionary states.."(harpies) a greedy, predatory person".


How appropriate..


Link
http://theeagleonline.com/opinion/story/dealing-with-aus-anti-sex-brigade/

Dealing with AU’s anti-sex brigade

(Or at least the feminist version of imaginary date rape.. )

Jeremiah Headen likely lost the vice presidency of the Student Government over a hyperbolic Facebook note. Its contents ‚ a blast of old-school masculinity ‚slammed men for not realizing that being manly had nothing to do with what is between one‚ legs, but rather is about values, stoic resolve and hard work. It ended with a silly, all-caps call to raid booty and women from neighboring villages.

The comments on The Eagle‚ Web site, mostly by Gay Party activists and feminists, condemned Headen for being an ‚anti-queer misogynist‚ and for undermining American University‚ commitment to being ‚safe space‚ for the ‚gay community. He was also rebuked for using the term ‚hermaphrodite‚ instead of ‚intersex.

What a sniveling bunch of emotional cripples! I have never encountered a more insular, solipsistic view of human sexuality than at this college. The rigidity of Pat Robertson has nothing on feminism.

Feminist religious dogma, long ago disposed of by neuroscientists and psychologists, states that men are essentially born as eunuchs, only to have wicked masculinity imposed on them by an evil society. This is usually presented as "social construction" theory.

Like the other great religions of the world, though, the goal of contemporary feminism and Gay Party activism is not to explain sex, but to abolish its passion. The yin and yang of masculinity and femininity is what makes sexual exploration exciting. Sex isn’t about contract-signing. It's about spontaneity, raw energy and control (or its counterpart, surrender). Feminism envisions a bedroom scene in which two amorphous, gender-neutral blobs ask each other, Is this OK with you? before daring to move their lips any lower on the other body. Worse yet: a gender-neutral sexuality can have no conception of the inherently gendered thrills of fetishism, sadomasochism, kink or cross-dressing. How blase

For my pro-sex views, I am variously called a misogynist, a rape apologist and my personal favorite ‚ a pro-date rape protofascist.
Let‚s get this straight: any woman who heads to an EI party as an anonymous onlooker, drinks five cups of the jungle juice, and walks back to a boy's room with him is indicating that she wants sex, OK? To cry ‚date rape‚ after you sober up the next morning and regret the incident is the equivalent of pulling a gun to someone's head and then later claiming that you didn't ever actually intend to pull the trigger.
Date rape‚ is an incoherent concept. There's rape and there's not-rape, and we need a line of demarcation. It's not clear enough to merely speak of consent, because the lines of consent in sex‚ especially anonymous sex ‚can become very blurry. If that bothers you, then stick with Pat Robertson and his brigade of anti-sex cavemen! Don't jump into the sexual arena if you can not handle the volatility of its practice.

Feminists don't understand history, psychology, biology or sexuality. To repair this desperate situation, I have altruistically prepared a list of five favored books about sex and gender: ‚"The Myth of Male Power" by Warren Farrell, "The Sexual Spectrum" by Olive Skene Johnson, "Vamps and Tramps" by Camille Paglia, "Philosophy In the Bedroom" by the divine Marquis de Sade, and "Who Stole Feminism?" by Christina Hoff Sommers. Put down the Andrea Dworkin and embrace the fires of sexuality!