Women Respect Only One Thing: Assholes..

Well, what can one say when those facts are out there and exploited in every which way. It would appear to be the case that it is so by simply reading any media outlet on the web where examples are a plenty. How many times have you read about the "Oh, he has had jail time" but women in their complete and utter ignorance are of the opinion that they can change them through sheer willpower and their magic "V'..

Too many have come to grief but continually return to that "relationship" thinking once again the impossible will happen..

I have blogged before about similar situations where the female will return to it as it sadly turns them on..

Women Respect Only One Thing: Assholes
in
Tom Leykis.
* Tip Of The Day

It's a phrase that is thrown around constantly, especially in Your Professor's direction: "You have to respect women!" Oh really? What exactly does that even mean?

* Put up with their shit? You know, like when they say one thing and then contradict it 20 seconds later? Or when they expect you to pay for anything and everything while telling you that they expect to be treated equally? Or when they lie about being on birth control and then later, when they get pregnant, want to know if you'll be "man enough to step up?"
* Do what they tell you? Like when to take out the garbage or who you can be friends with? How late you can stay out without checking in with Headquarters? What you should wear and what is wrong with what you are wearing?
* Listen to them bitch? Pay attention to their complaining about what you do and how you are and where you go? Complaining about what magazines you read or what websites you visit? How many people are trying like hell to finish this sentence only to have to her some bitch shrieking, "How long are you going to be playing with your computer?"
* Always correctly guess what is bothering them and then find a way to fix it? Accept responsibility for things you never did just to shut them the fuck up? Remember every anniversary of everything that ever happened? Your first date? Your first fuck? The day you two signed up with Netflix? To breezily accept the consequences of forgetting such "special days?"
* To accept that you are always, always, always wrong? And that you're a piece of shit?

Is that what women mean by saying that they "need to be respected?"

Stop worrying about respecting women. Women don't want to be respected. They want to be taken. They love being treated like shit and they come back for it time and time again.

Remember those nights that some chick kept you up late telling you about what an asshole her ex-boyfriend was? There's one thing that asshole got that you have never gotten and may never get: her pussy! Over and over! Hundreds if not thousands of times! "He was such a rude bastard. Such an asshole! And, as a result, the next time I am having sex is on my wedding night!" That's been you listening to that bullshit late at night at least once, hasn't it? Hoping that she will respect you enough to let you be her next boyfriend one day? And going home with blue balls? Yep, that has been you!

Are your parents divorced? Never forget that your mother told That Asshole (your father) that she was spreading her legs and it was time to stick it in, and not to worry about condoms because you "can't get pregnant" after just one time unprotected. In most cases in America, you are here only because your mom couldn't get enough sex from an asshole. Haven't you ever made the connection?

It is time for you to be the asshole women complain about to the next poor guy, and not to end up being the poor guy who has to hear about the previous asshole. When chicks threaten to tell their friends about you, just remember: it pays to advertise! Who's a bigger, more well-known asshole than Your Professor?

Time reach inside to find your inner asshole and stop worrying about being "more respectful to women." And never forget: your divorced Mom is on Match.com right now tarting herself up so she can find the NEXT asshole..

Link..

Eat, Pray and behave like a child..

Gotta like this article as it finally hits on the "I am so interesting because I am a woman" which ofcourse could be considered to be an oxymoron if you give it some thought, that mentality apparently, relentlessly sweeping not only the net but have convinced woman that it the standard as well..

NO DOUBT you've noticed that I've focused almost exclusively on women.

That's not a coincidence. While men do the memoir thing, too, like Jack Kerouac giving us tales from the road (and St. Augustine and Augusten Burroughs providing interesting confessions), women seem to have cornered the market on these paginated therapy sessions.

They also have an inflated sense of how interesting memories can be.

Maybe it's time for a little amnesia.

Amnesia would definitely be justified in this situation..

Christine M. Flowers: Eat, pray, love - but please don't write!

By Christine M. Flowers
Philadelphia Daily News

I WAS IN the seventh grade when I first heard of Anne Frank.

Like most schools, ours included in our required reading the moving diary of the tragic teenager who lost her life at Bergen-Belsen.

Frank's account of her imprisonment is a fine example of autobiography: The exquisite simplicity of her words masks the profound nature of their significance. Anne's life, though brief, was important, and the hours spent immersed in her world aren't wasted.

Unfortunately, that can't be said about most of what passes for autobiography these days.

The shelves are filled with books that raise narcissism to an art form, with more navel-gazing than on the Florida Citrus Council. Today, with our short attention spans, they call them "memoirs" - and just about anybody with a keyboard and an inflated sense of her own self-importance can try to get into Oprah's Book Club.

The genre includes. . .

Books by Unexceptional Women Who've Deluded Themselves into Thinking That Their Every Thought Is Transcendental.

Elizabeth Gilbert owns this terrain, having written the iconic "I am woman, hear me bore" title of all time: "Eat Pray Love."

Not since Anais Nin started writing about the angst in her pelvis has one woman made such a splash with her midlife crisis, dragging us along on her journey to (alleged) self-discovery.

She feels unappreciated in her marriage, so files for divorce from a husband who still loves her. And then, to recover from the split, she dines in Italy, divines in India and ultimately ends up supine in Bali with a hot Brazilian.

I know that a lot of women found that life-affirming, but the only affirmation I came away with was that she did her ex a huge favor by dumping him.

Books by Misfits Who Need to Tell Us How Pathetic They Used to Be but Aren't Anymore (Wink-Wink).

I'm not even going to get into the whole "James Frey lied to Oprah" situation in which people write books that pretend to be fact-based about how screwed up they used to be.

I'll limit myself to the people who were authentically screwed up but found God or AA or Dr. Phil and now feel good enough to write explicit tell-alls where, for $25.95, they'll make us feel sane (or depressingly normal) by comparison.

Most of these confessions are by people with eating disorders, drinking problems, co-dependency issues or a combination of all three. One such tome is called "Loose Girl: A Memoir of Promiscuity," which was described by Publishers Weekly as a "deeply poignant, desperately sad account of a confused, directionless adolescent girl's free fall into self-abnegation." What they call self-abnegation, I call hooking up with whatever guy crosses her path and blaming it on her parents' divorce. The only thing "desperately sad" about this is that it got published in the first place. Note to Lindsay Lohan: It's already been done.

Books by Women Who Dare You to Call Them Sluts.

Not to be confused with the previous category. While people who have suffered from a disorder-of-the-month at least have the good grace to frame their lives as cautionary tales (even "Loose Girl" has an epiphany in the end), these are by exhibitionists who like to push the envelope of what is socially acceptable, making us feel ashamed for even thinking of criticizing them.

The hands-down (or wherever) queen of the genre is Chelsea Handler, the late-night talk-show host and comedian who hit the New York Times best-seller list with her memoirs "My Horizontal Life," "Are You There, Vodka? It's Me, Chelsea" and "Chelsea, Chelsea, Bang, Bang." From the titles, it's clear that the series started by Handler is less "Little House" and more "House of Ill Repute."

And she feels absolutely no shame in laying bare her soul about her many relationships with men, drugs and alcohol.

Unlike poor "Loose Girl," Handler is proud of her accomplishments in the sack (and on the floor, under the eaves, astride a drain pipe, in the grain silo, and so forth). While literature has always had its bad girls like Dorothy Parker and Mary McCarthy, at least they could write.

NO DOUBT you've noticed that I've focused almost exclusively on women.

That's not a coincidence. While men do the memoir thing, too, like Jack Kerouac giving us tales from the road (and St. Augustine and Augusten Burroughs providing interesting confessions), women seem to have cornered the market on these paginated therapy sessions.

They also have an inflated sense of how interesting memories can be.

Maybe it's time for a little amnesia.

Christine M. Flowers is a lawyer.

E-mail cflowers1961@yahoo.com.

Humour: Or maybe Not..

Well, you know every now and again  I sometimes slip in a little bit of humour..?

This should get the blood rushing every time you even think of going to the beach..

Grankini: Helen Mirren sparks boom in bikini sales for over 50s

Read more:

Lap Dancing Applicants May Now Require a Degree..

Any research surfacing from the bowels of any University these days has to be put under the "feminist" microscope just to ensure that it is not just another attempt at maligning and tarring all men and treating the opposite sex as an endless, insatiable, victim-hood, merchant which ofcourse they are..

I am undecided on this specific article but it does ofcourse raise the level but the author (Dr Sanders) does concentrate her studies solely on men as if women do not purchase sex at all which ofcourse would be a blatant lie..
These days ofcourse an (Arts) degree is not even worth it's weight in tinsel and recycled rice paper but this does not apparently make any difference. Funnily enough, over the last week I met two females, both with University degrees working in, a. A drive through bottle shop and b. Behind the counter of a small food store. Neither were in management positions by the way..

And another point..

Feminists have been raging sickeningly about this type of work. Maybe next time they should at least ask the women they claim to be representing (by force) exactly where they stand on this rather than making ludicrous statement like "she was forced into it" which ofcourse is just another example on how easily and consistently they lie..

One in four lap dancers has a university degree

By Arthur Martin
Last updated at 12:41 AM on 28th August 2010

Read more:

They are traditionally viewed as uneducated young women who are coerced into the lap dancing industry.

But the first academic study on the subject has found that one in four lap dancers has a university degree and works in strip joints to boost their income.

Strippers take home an average of £232 per shift - or £48,000 a year - after paying commission and fees to the club where they work.



Many are aspiring actresses, models and artists who hope to use exotic dancing as a lucrative platform for breaking into their desired industry.

Unemployed new graduates – mainly with arts degrees – are also dancing because they cannot find graduate jobs.

They decided to work as strippers because it pays much better than bar work and the hours means they can still attend interviews, training days or further education courses during the day.

The research, conducted by Dr Teela Sanders and Kate Hardy from the University of Leeds, found the vast majority of women claimed to have high levels of job satisfaction.

It concluded that career and economic choices were the key reasons for dancing rather than drug use or coercion. There was no evidence of trafficking in the industry, researchers found.

However, the academics claimed dancers' welfare was often disregarded because women could be in danger when alone with customers in private booths.

They called for better regulations to improve dancers' safety, including the banning of private booths in clubs.

Dancers are also open to financial exploitation by clubs who could impose charges and fines, the study showed.

One dancer told researchers: 'There's not enough security. I know of girls who have been raped and abused at work.

'You cannot go to the police as you are a stripper, so there's no legal standing.'

The findings come after a change in the law saw lap dancing clubs reclassified as entertainment venues, giving local authorities more power to limit the number of clubs in their area.

Dr Sanders said she had been surprised at the 'endless supply of women' wanting to be lap dancers.

'These women are incredibly body confident,' she said. 'I think there is something of a generational cultural difference.

'These young women do not buy the line that they are being exploited, because they are the ones making the money out of a three-minute dance and a bit of a chat.

'You have got to have a certain way about you to do it. They say 80per cent of the job is talking. These women do work hard for their money – you don't just turn up and wiggle your bum.

'But there is an issue about whether these women become trapped in the job because of the money. I think people often stay longer than they want.'

All the 300 women interviewed during the year-long study had finished school and gained some qualifications.

Almost 90per cent had completed a further education course, while a quarter had undergraduate degrees.

Just over one in three dancers were currently in some form of education, with 14 per cent using dancing to help fund an undergraduate degree.

The researchers found arts degree graduates were most likely to turn to dancing after being unable to find other work.

Others used dancing to provide a more steady and reliable income when working in more unstable arts jobs.

One dancer had been doing a law degree which included a work placement during her third year.

While working, she got used to earning a good wage, decided she would struggle when she returned to university without an income, and began dancing as soon as she went back to finish her degree.

Amber, a 32-year-old who gave up a career in financial journalism to work as a lap dancer, said: 'It doesn't surprise me that dancers are well educated - I've met dancers who have degrees in astrophysics from top universities.'

Welmer: From Liberation to Chattel..

Another great article from Welmer at The-Spearhead.com. Posing a few interesting observations regarding the interference of feminists and the behaviour of women for centuries..

Food for thought..

For years, feminists have relied on the idea that a patriarchal conspiracy has been responsible for the nearly universal tendency to treat women as something in between an enfranchised individual and property. However, if one takes a closer look at the behavior and demands of women themselves, including and especially those who have been “liberated” since birth, the reality that presents itself is that this is exactly the role that they want.

From Liberation to Chattel

The radical reinterpretation of marriage that has been underway in the West for the past century or so, which began in earnest with universal suffrage, has put men in a tight spot. Comparisons to chattel slavery are entirely apt, given the legal regime surrounding marriage, which can put a man into lifelong indentured servitude, restrict his movement, and imprison him for failing to follow the state mandate to pay his ex-wife or children’s mother. At this point, men are on the ropes. Women control most of the wealth in the United States and probably a number of other Western countries, men’s traditional entitlements as fathers and husbands have been entirely stripped away and replaced with obligations (the opposite of entitlements), and politicians – conservative and liberal alike – are gunning for more of the same.
However, the ultimate consequences of radical policies are not always what folks intended them to be. It is common for people to become virtually enslaved by their entitlements, as men were in the 20th century, when the meaning of being “head of the family” switched from lord and master of the home to dutiful wage slave. As many men have remarked, having a man as “head of household” became a better deal for the wife than the husband following the Industrial Revolution. What benefit is it to be head of household when one spends little time at home, and is unconscious for the better part of that time anyway?
Now that the tables have turned, and men have incurred legal obligations to remunerate women for drawing breath, women’s role in society is undergoing a change that, although subtle, is readily evident from one decade to the next.
As an example, billionaire Donald Bren, a Los Angeles real-estate tycoon, has recently been in the news over a child support lawsuit pursued by his adult children at the behest of their mother, Jennifer McKay Gold. The appropriately named Ms. Gold had a 13-year “affair” with Mr. Bren and bore two illegitimate children by him, who are now 18 and 22 years old. Bren came to an agreement with Ms. Gold about child support, paying her some $3.5 million over 24 years and spending considerably more exclusively on the children. Toward the end of that period, Ms. Gold was receiving $216,000 per year of untaxed income — a tidy sum for taking her clothes off and providing entertainment from time to time. There’s no doubt that she was the envy of all her girlfriends, lived in a nice house, drove a nice car, and had a closet full of expensive clothes and shoes — all the trappings that fulfill life’s purpose for your typical California female.
But that wasn’t enough for her. No, she wanted to bequeath a fortune to her illegitimate children, doubtless purely out of altruism and motherly concern. So she urged them to sue their father for no less than $134 million (if there was ever any doubt that she was the driving force behind the lawsuit, Gold eliminates it by repeatedly speaking for her children and using the pronoun “we” when making statements to the press). Unfortunately for Ms. Gold and her children, they had to make the case to a jury that was likely comprised mainly of people who had never made as much on a monthly basis as she collected in child support. Her attorney, Hillel Chodos, unintentionally injected some humor into the pathetic situation by arguing as follows:

They are not here because they didn’t have enough to live on, they are here because they were deprived by Donald Bren of their birthright. They had the right to share in his standard of living.

Now I don’t know Mr. Chodos personally, and he may have been having a bad day, but that line of argument – especially in front of a jury – makes him come off as a second-rate attorney at best.

What’s so ridiculous about the argument is that the children were the result of an “affair,” and therefore appeals to old-fashioned notions such as “birthright” are entirely out of place — opposing counsel might as well have countered with the legal rights of bastards, which in English law stipulated that there was no birthright (i.e. inheritance).
But if you really want to be technical about it, Ms. Gold was a de facto concubine, and that’s why the jury rejected Chodos’s argument.
Concubinage was common in many civilized societies throughout the world for thousands of years, but widespread legal reforms based on Westernization or Communism essentially eliminated the practice in all but a few places. In the West, concubinage (at least the legally recognized variety) was snuffed out by Christianity, which imposed harsh penalties to limit the practice, including stigmas against bastards, religious sanction against those who practiced some form of it (churchmen such as bishops were frequent offenders) and strong social pressure. Without an ideology or religion to counter concubinage, it appears to be something that occurs naturally in human society. It is a social contract whereby the big man who hoards more than his share of women is expected to maintain the females and their offspring at some minimum level of comfort, which usually turns out to be greater than that enjoyed by your typical peasant or tribesman.
In general, the biggest difference between wives and concubines was that wives were much more difficult to put away due to property arrangements (e.g. dowries, land consolidation), and wives’ children were considered legitimate heirs. Of course, there were exceptions, but as a rule the status of a wife was significantly higher than that of a concubine.
If one takes a close look at contemporary American society, it appears that concubinage is gradually reasserting itself in Western culture and law. This is an inevitable result of the idea that men have an obligation to financially support illegitimate children; an idea that was rejected by Christians because it fatally weakens the incentives for women without significant property to engage in monogamous marriage. In fact, Islam prohibits concubinage as well, and dictates that although a man may have up to four wives, each one will have the same status under the law. Abuses have always occurred, but the contrast between European and East Asian society (Chinese in particular) was stark up until modernization in Asia. Rich Chinese men often had a “first wife” and varying numbers of concubines, the Emperor would have hundreds of them, and lots of ordinary Chinese men had to make do sharing prostitutes or going entirely without a woman.
For young women, a life as a concubine is often preferable to being married to a poor man, and increasingly that option is open to them in the US. For the lucky few women – usually the exceptionally attractive and mercenary – a sexual relationship with a wealthy businessman, athlete or politician can guarantee decades of support if she manages to get pregnant. Rielle Hunter, John Edwards’ adulterous lover, is an example of a woman who pulled it off. Scores of women manage to hit the jackpot with young, unsophisticated athletes; thousands upon thousands of others we’ve never heard of take advantage of relatively wealthy men. In these cases, where child support will be enough to live on, the arrangement is concubinage in all but name. The only argument against equivalency is that sexual exclusivity is not guaranteed, as it usually was in ancient forms of concubinage, but given that sexual exclusivity is neither guaranteed nor enforced in marriage any longer and concubinage has always been held to be a lesser alternative to full marriage, it is fulfilling the exact same role the institution did in ancient times.
What is ironic about all this is that the endless demands women make for financial entitlements are slowly creating a legal basis for women’s status as chattel. Culturally, the effect will likely be similar, as it is difficult to counter the sense that what is paid for is owned. Despite the endless complaints from feminists about women being objectified and treated as chattel, now that women have secured the right to do as they please they are busy lobbying themselves into a position where it would be difficult to treat them in any other manner.
For years, feminists have relied on the idea that a patriarchal conspiracy has been responsible for the nearly universal tendency to treat women as something in between an enfranchised individual and property. However, if one takes a closer look at the behavior and demands of women themselves, including and especially those who have been “liberated” since birth, the reality that presents itself is that this is exactly the role that they want.

Quentin Bryce: Feminist and Labour Supporter..

This is what happens when you put a feminist/socialist in charge as a Govener General of Australia. This toady has done the former Prime Minister's bidding (K.Rudd) and sent off to Africa to drum up support for a position in the UN, a position to which he has been appointed..

Nothing like putting a woman in charge is there to thoroughly screw everything up..

They even have to explain her bias..

Men in the past have been unbiased as well as apolitical, carrying out their duty with dignity and honour but not this politically appointed feminist. It is truly laughable..

No conflict for Governor-General Quentin Bryce, says Solicitor-General

GOVERNOR-General Quentin Bryce would not have to step aside if she was called on to settle the political deadlock in Canberra, despite Labor powerbroker Bill Shorten being her son-in-law.
Government House today released legal advice from Solicitor-General Stephen Gageler that said Ms Bryce does not have any constitutional or other legal impediment that would impede her performing her job.
In her letter to Mr Gageler, Ms Bryce said circumstances could require her to be “playing some role” in settling the deadlock and “integrity and trust” were of the upmost importance.
Her daughter Chloe is married to Mr Shorten and Ms Bryce said “it has been suggested in some quarters” this might create a conflict of interest.
Mr Gageler said in normal circumstances the G-G would take advice from the PM but in “extraordinary circumstances” the GG might have to exercise “her own deliberative judgment”.

He said extraordinary circumstances “cannot wholly be excluded”.
But he said former G-Gs had been politicians and maintained personal relationships with politicians and that did not disqualify them from holding the office or performing the job.
“Where they exist, connections and relationships of that kind must be recognised as realities. They fall to be managed as a matter of prudence, not of legal obligation or legal impediment,” he wrote.
“My advice to Her Excellency is that the marriage of her daughter to Mr Shorten gives rise to no constitutional or other legal impediment to the proper discharge of her functions of office.”

Microsoft: Going Politically Correct On Meter Maids..

Okay, I am not a big fan of Microsoft as they have caused me so much misery starting with Dos and Windows 3.2, way back when and I thought this may be a good time for some payback..

Now, let me see if I recognise the issue here.

Here is the story..

Link..

Meter Maids hit back after Microsoft criticism of their appearance 

GOLD Coast Meter Maids boss Roberta Aitchison has labelled Microsoft's objections to the gold bikini-clad icons' appearance at their 'boring' Tech-Ed conference welcoming reception as 'ridiculous'. ''They (the meter maids) provided glamour to what could have been a very boring event,'' she told the Gold Coast Bulletin.
''Microsoft picked the outfits a week before and knew exactly what they would be wearing.
''Everyone there had a ball and they were telling the meter maids in Surfers Paradise how much fun they had.
''I don't know if it was just a few bitter women (complaining) or what.''
The Meter Maids were dressed in gold bustiers, wet-look hot pants and three-quarter length jackets for the event, she said.
Microsoft stood by their previous statement and said they apologised to their conference delegates for any offence cause by the Meter Maids.

The calamity hit micro-blogging site Twitter yesterday, with people tweeting from the conference about the "badly done" stunt.
The conference is being held at the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre this week with all tickets sold out to about 2500 people.
The Meter Maids were hired by Microsoft as part of the welcoming reception on Tuesday night.
"It seems that there are still marketing and promotional folks in the IT world who consider objectification of women to be OK," female IT worker Kate Carruthers told a Fairfax newspaper.
Carruthers said the meter maid stunt detracted from Microsoft's long history of supporting and encouraging women in the information technology sector.
And ironically the conference, which is aimed at encouraging developers to write software for Microsoft, also devoted a key session to "women in IT."
Even some of Microsoft's own icons, Nick Hodge and Catherine Eibner, went on Twitter to express their disapproval. Eibner said it was "a badly done attempt at providing local Gold Coast context."
Microsoft released a statement saying they would like to "sincerely apologise for any offense caused by the promotional staff."
"We were unaware of their exact costuming until the day of the event, at which time it was too late to be addressed," the company said.

 Having spent copius nights sleeping on the beach at the Gold Coast (for reason I will not go into here) in the 70's, even back then these icons were wandering the streets and what they do is feed your parking meter so you do not get a parking ticket. Back then it was a tourism promotion and went down well with all and sundry. Go to the Gold Coast, park anywhere and no parking ticket. Eh ! works for me..

But Microsoft pro-feminist, politically correct assuages obviously had heartburn witnessing women (GASP) in bikinis doing a promo (this would probably explain when you play Age of Empire 2 your new additions to the community are mostly women at a ratio of two to one)..

Dear oh dear, bearing in mind that the Gold Coast is akin to Florida, so most of the year it's either hot, not so hot or nearly hot..

Microsoft released a statement saying they would like to "sincerely apologise for any offense caused by the promotional staff."

So if you are wondering which company is promoting and ensuring "political correctness" I think we may have found one..

It would appear that Microsoft is just another feminist apologist. Bear that in mind the next time you purchase their over priced products..

Scott Moss: Another Feminist Apologist..

Well I suppose one had to respond if only to demonstrate how affective we have become at naming the names of the individuals who are not only answerable but should be held accountable for the destruction they have forced onto society with their male-hatred and their "Only women are victims" mentality. This apparently justifies their lying, exaggerations as well as supplying rubbery figures in so called research, statistics, imaginary studies that are so biased and ludicrous that even a child can see through them, (my favourite is the 1 in 4 statistic, which one is yours ?)..

But Scott Moss ( feminist sycophant and anti-male sympathizer even though being one himself, figure that one out yourself) protests that his name is on that list. And I wondered why, why would anyone bother to respond to a blog that in his opinion is irrelevant and in turn is authored by an anonymous blogger but Scott is well aware of the "best part of defense, is attack" which he demonstrates nicely..

Why a  nom de plume, several reasons Moss,

1. ..and this is the most important, the mentality of nastiness feminists have introduced to the net is there for all to see. Their automatic "If you are not a feminist, you are the enemy, A MISOGYNIST" again is there for everyone to read and witness.Anyone daring to question feminism must be destroyed as we already know that it's anti-male programs and lengthy incoherent ramblings become just that when exposed to scrutiny and common sense. It's for that reason it has never been argued in the public arena.
2. Feminists enjoy nothing more than to tarnish and ruin anyone who does not cow-tow to their male-hating doctrine and they need to be obliterated as we expose their so called claims of equality for what it really is and that is, misandry at it worst and it's destructiveness towards the sexes at best..


So here is his response in it's full, unedited. untarnished response..

Dear Anonymous Blogger:

I saw the recent list you posted, and I’m curious about several things. First, I’m curious why you thought I am “male-hating.” I’m not; some of my best friends are men, and I’m one too.

Second, I’m curious how you could have researched, or how you expect others to have researched for you, the work of over 200 law professors to tell who secretly is “male-hating.” I suspect the use of some proxy, like assuming every professor who writes on XYZ topic or belongs to XYZ organization is “male-hating”? That would be a pretty odd assumption — that everyone who disagrees with you on a topic, or belongs to an organization you dislike, actually “hates men.” (As a side note, a few of the professors you list are no longer at the institution you list as their affiliation, so you probably want to do some updating.)

Third, I’m curious why, if you think “naming names” behind certain issue stances is so important, you remain anonymous on your blog. In another post, you blasted an anonymous commenter, calling her "'anonymous' for the coward she is." So I’m wondering how calling out other folks by name, while remaining anonymous yourself, is consistent with your disdain for cowardly anonymity.

Non-Anonymously,
Scott Moss

Feminists are always cowards when it comes actually admitting they are one, Scott is ofcourse no exception. So I had a quick look at the link supplied and guess what..

An Excerpt..

Women Choosing Diverse Workplaces: A Rational Preference with Disturbing Implications for Both Occupational Segregation and Economic Analysis of Law

Scott A. Moss
University of Colorado Law School



Harvard Women's Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2004

Abstract:     
Despite women's dramatic labor market gains, there remains a striking degree of occupational segregation by gender. Analysts typically blame discrimination or women's work/family priorities. This Article offers a different explanation.

It is hard for women choosing jobs or occupations to know where they will face discrimination, particularly since recent judicial decisions eliminated certain employer signals that once differentiated fair and discriminatory firms. One way women can effectuate a preference for nondiscriminatory workplaces is by choosing gender-diverse workplaces. Nondiverse workplaces often are not female-friendly, and discrimination may be the reason they are nondiverse. In economic terms, women rationally use level of diversity as a proxy for discrimination, since the latter is harder to observe.

For those of you who enjoy reading this dysfunctional drivel, feel free by all means but remember it's the usual cognitive dissonance that we have tolerated for way too long..

These are the same feminists that have fought tooth and nail denying "equality" to men. (Such as a Men's Health Department, Men's Health programs, the blatant sexism demonstrated by Universities, denying all men and boys equality in education, denying unemployed men work by redirecting Obama's plan by ensuring the majority of those billions were allocated to areas that employ mostly women even though 80% of the jobs lost were male workers..)

I could go on infinitum but say only this Scott. You are a sexist, you deny your own gender and succour policies designed to further women only and you wonder why we have called you to account.

This is only just the beginning by the way. The Mens Movement will ensure that everyone like you and your male-hating compatriots will be held accountable for your actions. We are instituting programs that will ensure that your position, income and longevity in the Educational System is limited by reducing funds to your misandric policies and methods..

We will promote the "Canadian Government" lines and dry up your funds and if possible ensure some charges or jail time be made available for your crimes against (Humanity) half of the population.

That is our aim and that is what we are working towards right now..

So enjoy your cushy little position Scott because I can guarantee that it's end is inevitable.

Plotting ex-wife gets 7-14 years in jail..

At least on the odd occasion justice can be seen to be served, not often enough though..

Before her arrest in September 2008, Ruggiero nearly had the criminal justice and family court system fooled, according to prosecutors.

The Family Courts requires no proof of any claims any woman makes and they have and will go on making ludicrous claims which the family law courts will automatically accept as fact regardless of the absence of witnesses, proof, doctor's certificates or medical reports, and even a sworn statement is totally unnecessary..

If it's a women making any statement, no matter how ridiculous, it is deemed to be fact..

How's that for administering justice..

So we have a prime example of another privileged princess behaving probably normally as far as I can tell but this is not the family court, it's one of the other ones and here you are held accountable..

Plotting ex-wife gets 7-14 years in jail

By JAMES A. KIMBLE

Union Leader Correspondent
Friday, Aug. 20, 2010

BRENTWOOD – Kristin Ruggiero will spend 7 to 14 years in state prison for what police say was part of a years-long ploy to use the criminal justice system against her ex-husband, who was thrown in jail and nearly lost his career during a bitter divorce.

Judge Kenneth McHugh said Ruggiero's attempt to set up her ex-husband and use the legal system as a weapon was unlike any other case he has seen.

"There's a lot of people, usually women, who have been subjected to abuse by their significant others," McHugh said, during Ruggiero's sentencing yesterday. "As a result of her actions, their cases, their safety, their security has been damaged. The web for this is much greater than what has just happened to Mr. Ruggiero."

A jury found that Kristin Ruggiero registered a disposable cell phone under her ex-husband's name and sent herself a dozen threatening and suicidal text messages. She then reported to East Kingston police in May 2008 that her ex-husband had violated bail conditions tied to a criminal threatening case, which police learned was also fabricated by the 34-year-old mother.
Aug. 17, 2010 ruggiero 60px

RUGGIERO

By portraying herself as a victim, she duped local police and portrayed her ex-husband, Jeffrey Ruggiero, as a violent monster while the couple was going through a contentious divorce in family court, according to prosecutors.

A nasty little individual that I hope and pray you never come across..

While Jeffrey Ruggiero was being investigated, his ex-wife called him at all hours and taunted him over the phone, according to court testimony.
"She mocked him. She laughed at him. (She said) 'I took all your money, I took your daughter and now I am going to take your career'," Assistant County Attorney Jerome Blanchard said in court yesterday.

And that is apparently not all..

Prosecutors revealed during Ruggiero's sentencing hearing that a new criminal investigation related to her is under way.

Link to video and rest of article..

Black Women Make their Own Choices: But they Need to Be Saved..

Chee ! the pain and agony of it all..

But Ms. Lui has hope. "Our government knows how to build wealth for people," she explains. "They've done it for others and they can do it for all of us." All they need is a push -- probably a big one -- in the right direction.

Yes, ofcourse, only for women though and specifically only black women need to be promoted and saved. The sexism is outstanding..

Forty-five percent of black women in America have never been married, compared with 23 percent of white women, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey in 2006.

Link..

Should that not be some indicator about their attitude and behaviour ?

Over the past few decades, black women in America have made historic strides academically and professionally. According to the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, at least 60 percent of black students who get awarded college degrees are women. Black women make up 71 percent of black graduate students.

So no regrets leaving Black Men fending for themselves as black women are given the usual and preferred "women only" preferential treatment and maximise only their options..

So how well has that worked. Many have warned in the past to the fact that women very rarely marry "down" if ever, so they have actually created their own problem by ignoring the education of black men right across the board..

Link..

They have been caught out by their own greed and selfishness and now don't like the end result, typical feminist agenda and attitude..

This following link most probably states their situation very succinctly..

WTF? OMG! Single Black Women Are Gonna Die Alone

So in the blame game they really have no one to blame but themselves.  Black women's reputations preceed them and we all know what that is already and it ain't pretty. When is the last time you watched a program where the black female was not a major obnoxiuos pain in the arse..

Really, WHEN..

 And to top all that of we have this bit of self-serving sexism and the usual "Women are such Victims" saga..

Question: What do $42,600 and $5 have in common?

Answer: they both represent the median net wealth of middle-aged American women. The only difference between the two numbers is race; while single white women from the ages of 36 to 49 have a median wealth of $42,600, single black women have a net wealth of just $5.

You read that right. The average net worth of middle-aged black women is just $5. And this statistic was drawn from the recently released 2007 Survey of Consumer Finances, which means that current post-recession figure could be even worse.

Before jumping into an explanation of this ridiculously low number, let me provide a quick note for the economically disinclined. Net wealth refers to "the total of one's assets -- cash in the bank, stocks, bonds and real estate; minus debts -- home mortgages, auto loans, credit cards and student loans." And a median is the middle number in a set of data, meaning that about half of single, middle-aged black women are worth more than five dollars and half are worth less.

So why is the net wealth of black women less than a fast food value meal? "The popular image is they spend too much, which is the reason they are running up credit card and consumer debt," explains Meizhu Lui, director of Oakland's Closing the Gap Initiative. "But the cost of living has risen faster than income, and they need to go into debt for basic daily necessities."

One such "necessity" is taking care of struggling friends and family members. A 2008 ING report found that over half of black women surveyed had loaned more than $500 to friends or family in the previous year. "Black women's sense of obligation to community and family is both extraordinary and commendable," stated ING president Rhonda Mims. "But when you are pulled in so many directions financially, something or someone has to pay the price." That "someone," unfortunately, is often the generous black woman herself.

And then there's the employment factor. Black women are the primary breadwinners in 44 percent of black families with children, as opposed to only 24 percent of women across all racial and ethnic lines. As a result, explains the American Prospect, "the gender wage gap and the lack of labor-market opportunities has a bigger impact on the economic well-being of black families than it does for other groups." Compound that with inequitable pay -- black women make 85 cents for every dollar earned by white women and only 63 cents per dollar paid to white men -- and an ongoing eviction epidemic, and black women have a crisis on their hands.

But Ms. Lui has hope. "Our government knows how to build wealth for people," she explains. "They've done it for others and they can do it for all of us." All they need is a push -- probably a big one -- in the right direction.

Another Comment: "Wimmin's Studies" Need to Change Their Robotic Droning..

Yes, I know, another one..

How boring is this. Why don't they change the standard response they learn at "Wimmin's Sudies" and at least stop responding like automatons for a change..

So let's AGAIN witness the drivel and all it's ignorance..

It first of all throws in a strawman argument " How about men that move into a mans place" eh !!!, I have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about. What has that statement got to do with this post ?

But it answers it anyway. I like these type of comments as it clearly demonstrates that they have neither grown up or are capable of applying their own "equality" as feminists have been screaming about for years..

It is about equality Anunomous (not an error), pay your own damn way, pay your own bills and let Men get on with their own lives. The fact that you are not included is totally irrelevant, ducky..

And ofcourse, ironically, it is she who hates women as she derides the mother ( a bit like the ultimate insult gays make when they accuse you of being gay)

had a mother that never showed him any love and affection!!

 for being unfeeling and incapable of affection, include the unbalanced ex wife as well and throw in the kids for good measure..

And ofcourse that inevitable  " You need to get some help!!! ". It is not I apparently that requires psychological assistance..

Apparently totally ignorant of the virulent and toxic situation they themselves have instituted and created..

But let's blame everyone else..

Anonymous said...

How about men that move into a mans place, what for if you are only doing it for sex??!!!

Who ever wrote this article is bitter towards women and had a mother that never showed him any love and affection!!

Perhaps an ex-wife that can't stand him and kids that won't talk to him either.

Keep thinking like this and you will grow old alone and live a pathetic life!!!

You need to get some help!!!

August 24, 2010

Feminists: Naming Names..

As part of my New Years Resolution I am pleased to name the names of your oppressors, these feminists and feminist supporters are responsible for the misery and pain inflicted daily on many Men and Women in western countries. Their on going promotion of a male-hating doctrine is there for all to witness..
 From The-Spearhead..

These lists are golden for political purposes, as cross-referencing can easily identify associations that are dedicated to feminism, allowing us to identify enemies and their allies as well as their opponents. They should be widely distributed so that plenty of people can use them.

Albany Law School

• Alicia Ouellette
• Laurie Shanks

American University Washington College of Law

• Ann Shalleck
• Anthony Varona
• Billie Jo Kaufman
• Christine Haight Farley
• Mary Clark
• Nancy D. Polikoff
• Pamela Bridgewater
• Victoria Phillips

Boston University School of Law

• Katharine Silbaugh
• Linda McClain
• Wendy Gordon

Brigham Young University School of Law

• Cheryl Preston

Bristol Law School

• Rachel Fenton

Brooklyn Law School

• Anita Bernstein
• Liz Schneider
• Minna Kotkin

California Western School of Law

• Nancy Kim

Chapman University School of Law

• Francine J. Lipman

City University of New York

• Caitlin Borgmann
• Deborah Zalesne
• Jenny Rivera
• Julie Goldscheid
• Michelle Anderson
• Penelope Andrews
• Rebecca M. Bratspies
• Richard Storrow
• Ruthann Robson

Cleveland State University College of Law

• Lolita Buckner Inniss

Columbia Law School

• Ariela Dubler
• Carol Sanger
• Caroline Bettinger-Lopez
• Elizabeth Emens
• Elizabeth Scott
• Jane Spinak
• Katherine Franke
• Kendall Thomas
• Patricia Williams
• Susan Sturm
• Suzanne Goldberg

Cumberland School of Law, Samford University

• Marcia L. McCormick

Drexel University College of Law

• Anil Kalhan
• David S. Cohen

Duke University School of Law

• Kimberly Krawiec

Elon University School of Law

• Eric M. Fink

Emory University School of Law

• Martha Fineman

Florida Coastal School of Law

• Nareissa Smith

Florida International University College of Law

• Cyra Akila Choudhury
• David D. Walter

Florida State University College of Law

• Faye E. Jones
• Lesley Wexler

Fordham Law School

• Sonia Katyal

George Washington University Law School

• Alexa Freeman
• Joan Meier
• Naomi Cahn
• Neil Buchanan
• Phyllis Goldfarb

Georgetown University Law Center

• Nan Hunter
• Rebecca Tushnet

Golden Gate University School of Law

• Leslie Rose

Gonzaga University School of Law

• Mary Pat Treuthart

Hamline University School of Law

• Marie A. Failinger
• Sharon Sandeen
• Tom I. Romero

Harvard Law School

• Elizabeth Bartholet

Hofstra University School of Law

• Barbara Lukeman
• Elizabeth M. Glazer

Humbolt University Berlin Law Faculty

• Susanne Baer

Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law

• Felice Batlan

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

• Susan H. Williams

Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis

• Jennifer A. Drobac
• Shawn Boyne

John Marshall Law School

• Colin Miller
• Doris Long
• Susan L. Brody

Lewis & Clark Law School

• Kathy Hessler

Louisiana State University Law Center

• Christine Corcos

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law

• M. Isabel Medina

Marquette University Law School

• Andrea K. Schneider
• Jessica E. Price
• Lisa Mazzie Hatlen
• Rebecca Blemberg

McGill University

• Kim Brooks

Michigan State University College of Law

• Catherine Grosso
• Cynthia Lee Starnes
• Joan Howarth
• Kristi L. Bowman
• Melanie B. Jacobs

New York Law School

• Ann F. Thomas
• Carlin Meyer
• William P. LaPiana

New York University School of Law

• Amy Adler
• Meg Satterthwaite
• Sylvia Law

Northwestern University School of Law

• Elizabeth L. Inglehart
• Kimberly Yuracko

Ohio State University College of Law

• Marc Spindelman

Pace Law School

• Adele Bernhard
• Alexander K.A. Greenawalt
• Andrew C.W. Lund
• Audrey Rogers
• Barbara Atwell
• Bennett Gershman
• Bridget Crawford
• Darren Rosenblum
• David Cassuto
• David Dorfman
• Don Doernberg
• Emily Gold Waldman
• Horace Anderson
• Janet A. Johnson
• Jeffrey Miller
• Jill Gross
• John Humbach
• Leslie Yalof Garfield
• Linda Fentiman
• Margaret M. Flint
• Marie Stefanini Newman
• Michael Mushlin
• Michelle Simon
• Noa Ben-Asher
• Ralph Stein
• Vanessa Merton

Pennsylvania State University

• Eileen Kane

Princeton University

• Imani Perry

Rutgers University School of Law – Camden

• Imani Perry
• Sarah Ricks

Rutgers University School of Law – Newark

• Suzanne A. Kim

Santa Clara University School of Law

• Margaret M. Russell
• Michelle Oberman
• Stephanie M. Wildman

Seattle University School of Law

• Julie Shapiro
• Lily Kahng
• Margaret Chon

Seton Hall University School of Law

• Rachel D. Godsil

South Texas College of Law

• Kathleen Bergin

Southern Methodist University School of Law

• Rose Cuison Villazor
• Susan Scafidi

Southwestern Law School

• Angela Riley
• Danni Hart
• Gowri Ramachandran
• Judy Sloan
• KC Sheehan
• Myrna Raeder
• Sung Hui Kim

St. Thomas University School of Law

• Lauren Gilbert

Stanford Law School

• Deborah Rhode

State University of New York at Buffalo

• Athena D. Mutua
• Martha McCluskey

Stetson University College of Law

• Ellen Podgor
• Marleen O’Connor

Suffolk University Law School

• Frank Rudy Cooper
• Jessica Silbey
• Kate Nace Day
• Marie Ashe

Syracuse University College of Law

• Kevin Noble Maillard
• Leslie Bender

Technorati

• Technorati

Temple University School of Law

• JoAnne Epps
• Kathryn Stanchi
• Marina Angel

Texas Southern University School of Law

• Deana Pollard Sacks

Texas Tech University School of Law

• Jennifer S. Bard

The University of Chicago

• Mary Anne Case

Thomas Cooley Law School

• Kimberly O’Leary

Thomas Jefferson School of Law

• Marjorie Cohn

Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

• Deseriee Kennedy
• Meredith R. Miller
• Tracy L. McGaugh

Tulane University Law School

• Elizabeth Nowicki

Umeå University

• Ã…sa Gunnarsson

University of Alabama School of Law

• Kimberly Ann Bart
• Meredith Render
• Montré D. Carodine

University of Arkansas at Little Rock School of Law

• Theresa M. Beiner

University of Baltimore School of Law

• Leigh Goodmark
• Margaret Johnson
• Wendy Gerzog

University of British Columbia Faculty of Law

• Claire Young
• Susan B. Boyd

University of California at Irvine School of Law

• Dan L. Burk

University of California Berkeley Boalt Hall

• Melissa Murray

University of California Davis School of Law

• Courtney Joslin
• Dennis Ventry
• Lisa R. Pruitt
• Madhavi Sunder

University of California Hastings College of Law

• Kelly Weisberg

University of Cincinnati College of Law

• Barbara Black
• Kristen Kalsem
• Margaret Drew
• Verna Williams

University of Colorado School of Law

• Carolyn Ramsey
• Clare Huntington
• Laura Spitz
• Marianne Wesson
• Scott Moss

University of Dayton School of Law

• Pamela Laufer-Ukeles
• Vernellia R. Randall

University of Denver College of Law

• Ann Scales
• Kristian Miccio

University of Detroit Mercy School of Law

• Bonita Gardner
• Bret Boyce
• David Koelsch
• Jennifer Henderson
• Julia Belian
• Julie St. John

University of Florida College of Law

• Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol
• Nancy Dowd

University of Houston Law Center

• Nancy B. Rapoport

University of Idaho College of Law

• Elizabeth B. Brandt
• Maureen Laflin

University of Illinois College of Law

• Beth Burkstrand-Reid
• Christine Hurt
• Sara R. Benson

University of Kansas School of Law

• Stacy Leeds

University of Kentucky School of Law

• Lori Ringhand
• Sarah N. Welling

University of Louisville School of Law

• Jim Chen

University of Manitoba Faculty of Law

• Debra Parkes
• Jennifer L. Schulz
• Karen Busby

University of Maryland School of Law

• Danielle Citron
• Karen Czapanskiy
• Martha M. Ertman

University of Miami School of Law

• Caroline Mala Corbin
• Donna Coker
• Mary Coombs
• Zanita Fenton

University of Michigan Law School

• Jessica Litman

University of Minnesota Law School

• Dan L. Burk
• Heidi Kitrosser
• Mary Louise Fellows

University of Missouri-Kansas City

• June Carbone
• Nancy Levit

University of Nebraska College of Law

• Colleen Medill
• Eric Berger
• Sandi Zellmer

University of Nevada Las Vegas

• Ann McGinley
• Jean Whitney
• Kay Kindred
• Lynne Henderson
• Rachel Anderson

University of New Mexico School of Law

• Margaret E. Montoya
• Marsha Baum

University of North Carolina School of Law

• Tamar Birckhead

University of Oregon School of Law

• Caroline Forell

University of Ottawa Faculty of Law

• Ian Kerr

University of Pennsylvania Law School

• Anita L. Allen-Castellitto
• Anne E. Kringel
• Regina Austin

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

• Anthony Infanti

University of San Diego School of Law

• Orly Lobel

University of San Francisco School of Law

• Maya Manian
• Rhonda Magee

University of South Carolina School of Law

• Ann Bartow
• Danielle R. Holley-Walker
• Jacquline Fox
• Kim Diana Connolly
• Susan Kuo

University of Southern California Law School

• Mary L. Dudziak

University of Tennessee College of Law

• Becky L. Jacobs
• Fran Ansley
• Jennifer Hendricks
• Joan MacLeod Heminway
• Mae Quinn

University of the Pacific School of Law

• Miriam A. Cherry
• Ruth Jones

University of Toledo College of Law

• Llewellyn Gibbons

University of Victoria Faculty of Law

• Elizabeth Adjin-Tettey
• Gillian Calder
• Maneesha Deckha
• Maureen Maloney

University of Virginia School of Law

• Kerry Abrams

Vanderbilt University Law School

• Beverly I. Moran

Vermont Law School

• Joan Vogel
• Stephanie Farrior

Villanova University School of Law

• Michelle Madden Dempsey
• Penny Pether

Wake Forest University School of Law

• Jennifer Collins
• Margaret H. Taylor

Washington & Lee University School of Law

• Joan Shaughnessy
• Susan D Franck

Washington University in St. Louis

• Laura Rosenbury

Wayne State University Law School

• Linda M. Beale

Western New England College Law School

• Erin Buzuvis
• Giovanna Shay
• Sudha Setty

Willamette University College of Law

• Laura Appleman
• Susan Smith

William and Mary Law School

• Rebecca Hulse
• Susan Grover

William Mitchell College of Law

• Sarah Deer

As Women Continue on Their Murderous Spree..

Ah yes, the feminists argument that "Women do not wrong" and " they are the caring sex" has already taken a severe beating but just in case you need further convincing have a look at these to links..

Women caught on CCTV dumping a cat into a rubbish bin..

and this..

Girl allegedly poisons parents with insecticide

The teen has been charged with three counts of administering a poison with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
Link..

ABC News -

A 17-year-old girl has appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates Court accused of trying to poison three people, including her parents.

Police allege teenager Mary Sutherland MacIntosh gave the insecticide carbamate methomyl to her mother Margot Elizabeth MacIntosh, and Angharad Jane Mills, at their Longreach property in central-west Queensland in May.

It is further alleged the teenager also tried to poison her father, Robert Dickson MacIntosh, with the same farm chemical almost two weeks later.

The teen has been charged with three counts of administering a poison with intent to do grievous bodily harm.

Prosecutors have not revealed the motive behind the allegations.

MacIntosh was not required to enter a plea and was released on bail on her own undertaking.
She has been remanded to a further court appearance next month.

Woman Murders Two Men and Walks Free..

I think that in the 2400+ posts on this blog I would have posted at least fifty examples on why it would be a major benefit to possess a vagina in the world today, it allows you to kill men without any or minor repercussions or accountability, zilch, nada..

That sex change is looking good..

Here, ofcourse is another prime example on how you can kill, no, murder two men, leave their families stranded and still just get off with a few months cleaning and washing something for penitence..

What a great law system feminists have put into place and the "LAW" subjugates itself to it's manipulation, lowers itself to it's adherence, grovels in abeyance and kisses it's rear in compliance..

Ever wonder why the ongoing loathing against women in general will eventually reach a crescendo ?

NOTE also that the headline does not say that a female was responsible, something to bear in mind..

No jail for killer Winnipeg driver

Link..

A Winnipeg woman who killed two Manitoba men in a devastating crash more than two years ago will not go to jail for her dangerous driving.

Lucy Muthoka, 53, was handed a suspended sentence and two years of probation Friday in the deaths of William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, on the evening of June 25, 2008.

The two friends were killed after being struck by an erratically driven Subaru Forester near the corner of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue. They were in Winnipeg from their home community of Cross Lake to attend medical appointments.

After a prolonged police investigation, Muthoka, the Subaru's driver, was arrested and charged with two counts of criminal negligence causing death on Dec. 11, 2008.

The Crown stayed the more serious charges in exchange for her guilty pleas to dangerous driving causing death.

'It's like getting kicked some more when you already suffered.'—Marlene Castel

The conditions of Muthoka's probation include performing 240 hours of community service work, writing a letter of apology to the families of the victims and the community of Cross Lake and participating in mediation with the families if they request it in the future.

She is forbidden from driving in Canada for the next 10 years.

She walked out of court at about 2:30 p.m. CT after signing her probation order.
Sudden acceleration

Muthoka was coming out of the Millennium Library's parkade when her car suddenly accelerated, according to a brief summary of the Crown's facts of the case told to provincial court Judge Brent Stewart.

David Matsubara was also injured in the crashDavid Matsubara was also injured in the crash (CBC)She slammed into a truck, swerved across a street and struck the two men, who died at the scene despite efforts by paramedics and passersby to save their lives.

Another man, David Matsubara, was injured, but survived.

Halcrow and Ross's families travelled to Winnipeg to attend Friday's sentencing hearing. Members of each family admitted being disappointed at the sentence Muthoka was given.

'It was lenient for her but not lenient for us.'—Betty Ross

"It's like getting kicked some more when you already suffered. There's no words I could use except that I'm very disappointed," said Marlene Castel, Halcrow's sister.

Ross's sister, Betty Ross, told CBC News that it appeared all efforts were being made during the court hearing to shield Muthoka from punishment.

"It almost felt that everybody was cushioning her, and that they were lifting her up and of course, the judge took that," Ross said.

"Sure enough, it was lenient for her but not lenient for us."

At a prior hearing, court heard that Muthoka had been sent threatening notes about the deadly crash. The nature of the notes was not revealed in court.

Muthoka spoke in court and apologized for what happened, but the victims' families said they were upset she didn't look at them while saying she was sorry.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2010/08/20/man-muthoka-no-jail-crash-dangerous.html#ixzz0xQamENmT

British Airways Collapses under the Might of the MENS MOVEMENT..

EQUALITY FOR MEN VICTORY AS BRITISH AIRWAYS CLIMB DOWNS ON ITS SEXIST POLICY

As covered comprehensively on the site (and here and here) and rightly a cause celebre for anyone who believes that equality should also apply to men, British Airways had a policy which stopped a man from sitting next to a child unless he was their father.
After suffering from this sexual discrimination (the policy did not apply to women) Mirko Fischer won a court case at Swindon County Court after he has was told by British Airways to move from his seat. It also forced British Airways to review its policies.
The Sunday Telegraph reports that British Airways has now changed its policy and dropped this discrimination.
This is a clear victory for male equality campaigners and shows what can be done as many have written and called BA to keep the pressure on. The policy probably would not have changed though without Mirko Fischer winning his court case so as well as male equality campaigners keeping the pressure up, sites like and others disseminating information there is a need for men to challenge issues through the courts.
This is glib as men are not backed by or supported by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission or has a vociferous and well funded group (including by the public sector) organisation like the anti-male Fawcett Society (though they will have been screwed by their pathetic and ridiculous challenge to the Governement's Budget).
Putting that aside the equality legisiation is therefore of men and women.
On other issue is something that has been seen before (the MFI advert was a classic example) is the fact British Airways does not show any sign of remorse that it operated a sexist policy. It hides behind jargonese but does not say sorry, that is shameful and speaks volumes.
Now it is just Qantas that has such a sexist policy.
Posted by Skimmington

I just noticed this entry on "The Rights Of MAN" blog and it is some what of a thorn in my side as well. Apparently this obvious sexist policy has now been scraped and apparently Qantas Australia and I would imagine so does Air New Zealand still maintain this sexist anti-male discriminatory policy..

They need to be sued as well..

So there are the Qantas link and Air NewZealand links for your consideration and verbalism. As usual, keep it civilised and to the point..

Now one must question the function of the "Human Rights Commission/s" around the world as they made absolutely no effort whatsoever to stop still blatant and obvious anti-male discrimination ( they also ignore the 80% of female teachers which ofcourse is discrimination by all Education Departments). So why are they there and what is it exactly they are supposed to do ?