No Sperm, No Peace..

There are other studies that have demonstrated the same facts as this and that is, if you are in a stable relationship, you are just about guaranteed to be sane, happy and behave like a female supposed to, physiologically speaking..

Unlike heterosexual females, lesbians haven't got a chance in hell as the comment below really suggests, no sperm, no peace and if you doubt that then have a read of this study on lesbian behaviour and the ongoing abuse they dish out and encounter..

It's part of an older lesbian-feminist paradigm which says most of the problems in the world come from men ...

Butch lesbians may think they are a male but without sperm, they are just sad, pathetic imitators of the real thing without the benefits..

… because lesbians would be expected to be in closer, more intimate contact with one another on a daily basis than other females who live together. What is it about heterosexual females that promotes menstrual synchrony, or conversely what is it about lesbians that prevents menstrual synchrony? It occurred to us that one feature that distinguishes heterosexual women from lesbians is the presence or absence of semen in the female reproductive tract. Lesbians have semen-free sex.

And they wonder why we tire after injecting that magic potion..

An ode to the many evolved virtues of human semen

Link..
Now, medical professionals have known for a very long time that the vagina is an ideal route for drug delivery. The reason for this is that the vagina is surrounded by an impressive vascular network. Arteries, blood vessels, and lymphatic vessels abound, and—unlike some other routes of drug administration—chemicals that are absorbed through the vaginal walls have an almost direct line to the body’s peripheral circulation system. So it makes infinite sense, argue Gallup and Burch, that like any artificially-derived chemical substance inserted into the vagina via medical pessary, semen might also have certain chemical properties that tweak female biology.

It turns out that this insight, so obvious as to be all but invisible, has been a theoretical gold mine for this hawkeyed pair of adaptation-minded thinkers. But before we jump into their rich vat of seminal theory, let’s have a quick look at some of the key ingredients of human semen. In fact, semen has a very complicated chemical profile, containing over 50 different compounds (including hormones, neurotransmitters, endorphins and immunosupressants) each with a special function and occurring in different concentrations within the seminal plasma. Perhaps the most striking of these compounds is the bundle of mood-enhancing chemicals in semen. There is good in this goo. Such anxiolytic chemicals include, but are by no means limited to, cortisol (known to increase affection), estrone (which elevates mood), prolactin (a natural antidepressant), oxytocin (also elevates mood), thyrotropin-releasing hormone (another antidepressant), melatonin (a sleep-inducing agent) and even serotonin (perhaps the most well-known antidepressant neurotransmitter).

Given these ingredients—and this is just a small sample of the mind-altering “drugs” found in human semen—Gallup and Burch, along with psychologist Steven Platek, now at the University of Liverpool, hypothesized that women having unprotected sex should be less depressed than suitable control participants. To investigate whether semen has antidepressant effects, the authors rounded up 293 college females from the SUNY-Albany campus, who agreed to fill out an anonymous, written questionnaire about various aspects of their sexual behavior. Recent sexual activity without condoms was used as an indirect measure of seminal plasma circulating in the woman’s body. Each participant also completed the Beck Depression Inventory, a commonly used clinical measure of depressive symptoms.

The most significant findings from this 2002 study, published with criminally modest fanfare in the Archives of Sexual Behavior , were these: even after adjusting for frequency of sexual intercourse, women who engaged in sex and “never” used condoms showed significantly fewer depressive symptoms than did those who “usually” or “always” used condoms. Importantly, these chronically condomless, sexually active women also evidenced fewer depressive symptoms than did those who abstained from sex altogether. By contrast, sexually active women, even really promiscuous ones, who used condoms were just as depressed as those practicing total abstinence. In other words, it’s not just that women who are having sex are simply happier, but instead happiness appears to be a function of the ambient seminal fluid pulsing through one’s veins.

And it gets better. A smaller percentage (4.5 percent) of the sexually active women who “never” used condoms were less likely to have attempted suicide than were those who “sometimes” (7.4 percent) and “usually” (28.9 percent) and “always” (13.2 percent) used condoms...

In addition to their semen-as-antidepressant model, Gallup and Burch have worked out many other intricate, persuasive arguments about how the various chemicals in human semen served—and continue to serve—biologically adaptive functions for both sexes. For example, among the more curious ingredients in human semen are follicle-stimulating-hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). The reason this is curious, point out Gallup and Burch, is because these are distinctively female hormones. “What are female hormones doing in human semen?” The authors speculate, and convincingly so, that the presence of FSH and LH in human semen is related to concealed ovulation in human females.

Unlike females of other primate species, women do not have breeding patterns governed by season or standardized cycles, and there are no obvious signals—such as a fire-engine red, swollen rear end—giving away their time of the month. So for a naïve human male, impregnating a woman as a consequence of sexual intercourse is much more a roll of the dice than it is for males of other species in their mating behaviors. Just as with any other species, though, getting the timing right so that release of semen coincides with the release of eggs is key. As a counterdefense against women’s concealed ovulation, male evolution had a trick up its sleeve, which was the ability to manipulate the timing of a woman’s ovulation to suit his own insemination schedule—that is to say, semen chemistry seems to give premature eggs a nice little nudging. Hence the conspicuous presence of FSH (which causes an egg in the ovary to ripen and mature) and LH (which triggers ovulation and release of that egg).

Julia Gillard: Let's Turn Boys into Girls..

Yet again, we have the usual stories about the educational system wanting to turn boys into girls and here we have further examples of this bias as well as the blatant sexist attitudes fostered on us by feminists, in this case Gillard, Australia's number one feminist and male-hater..

In my podcast on "Can Boys Survive School", I argue the exact same outcome as boys are told to behave like a girl, no running, no sports, sit down and sit still..

No wonder all that energy turns into misbehavior but it's another tool feminists use to malign boys and to downgrade their efforts. Meanwhile they have produced an environment suited specifically for girls and that ofcourse is their original intention..

Liz has no problem whacking the agitprop stick against the feminist's hypocrisy and malice ..

Call me crazy, but the school building program is turning boys into girls
September 30, 2010

Elizabeth Farrelly



There was a small flurry of aghastness recently when primary school canteens were exposed as serial breachers of government healthy-food nazism. By ''healthy'', here, we mean essentially non-fattening, worried as we are that before they hit 30 the roly-poly little dears will blow the nation's entire health budget on diabetes, heart disease, joint replacement and fully funded lap-banding. Quite right, too. The danger is real.

But from the child's-eye view, as I recall it, the whole point of the school lunch-order is to eat forbidden trash. Pie and chips, one-and-six, yum, yum, yum. I also recall the daily after-school pig-out on inch-slabs of fresh white bread, peanut butter and honey, all the while staying heedlessly skinny. This was bog standard, then. Not any more. So what else might be going on here?

On the basis that paranoia is just knowledge that precedes evidence, I offer the following hypotheses. The schools themselves are fattening our kiddies because, just as cricketers fix matches, governments now ''fix'' entire populations and bet among themselves, selling futures in lap-banding consultancies. Or this: a Gillardist fem-coup to make the Rudd assassination pale in comparison. Or, more sinister yet: a Third World plot to effeminate the West.

Sounds crazy. But look at the facts.

Schools across the country, force-fed by Julia Gillard's ''education revolution'' funding, are eating their own playgrounds. Two-and-a-half thousand in NSW alone, yet we're all happy about this, since it plumps the economy and could, we tell ourselves, drag our education system out of the toilet.

In construction are thousands of brick-veneer multipurpose halls and aluminium-windowed air-conditioned computer rooms with not a single string attached. No requirement to be carbon-neutral (kick-starting a new industry), or to be as gracious as their 19th-century counterparts, so steadfast in presenting education as a dignified pursuit. And no consideration at all, apparently, of what this rampant playground-guzzling might mean to the kiddies.

Perhaps, in Quirindi or Euchareena Heights where land is still (seen as) limitless, it's fine. But here in mid-metropolis - where play space is already scarce and school rolls are still swelling after decades of naked government profit-taking neglected the inevitable city-centre revival as habitat for breeding pairs of young professionals - here it's a problem.

Already, schools have lunchtime ''no running'' rules. This is true. No big balls (I'm refusing the obvious joke here, but have you ever tried to play soccer with a tennis ball?) and no chasey, barring the tamest possible version. Now that almost every school has a major chunk of its ''open'' space fenced and scaffolded, what will give?

Boys, and boy-ness, for a start. As even boisterousness becomes frowned-upon and the fighting that is bound to erupt in such pent conditions becomes punishable by that boys' own worst-possible penalty, endless hours of raking-it-over talk, just being a boy becomes a problem.

The incentive is to stay static, watch the screen, make like a girl, gossip, get fat. Which is where the double whammy kicks in. Estrogen.

Double whammy, double mammy. For not only does estrogen generate fat; fat also generates estrogen. Add this feedback loop to the xenoestrogens already ubiquitous in the environment and you have a very interesting development in endocrine politics.

Xenestrogens are industrially synthesised compounds - chemicals, in a word - that are not estrogen but have estrogen-like effects. They are in almost everything, from petrol fumes to food additives to sunscreens to plastics (especially food packaging) to drinking water (which may also contain actual estrogen, which so many women ingest daily either as the pill or hormone replacement). It's like feminism's revenge; our whole environment is becoming estrogen-soaked.

A 2008 study published in the Chemical Research in Toxicology journal found that two chemicals in particular - propyl gallate and 4-hexylresorcinol - were estrogen-mimickers, likely to be acting as endocrine disrupters in the food chain. It concluded that "some caution should be issued for [their use] as food additives".

Far from using caution, however, we gaily add these chemicals to cosmetics, hair products, food packaging and food itself. They're in edible fats, oils, mayonnaise, shortening, baked goods, candy, dried meat, fresh pork sausage, dried milk and throat lozenges.

And these are just the ones that were tested. There are dozens of other suspects. BPA, or bisphenol A, is known to leach from food-packaging polycarbonates (including most drink bottles) and has been suspected for 20 years of links to cancer, developmental disorders and reproductive damage.

Many countries, including France and Canada, are in the process of banning it, at least from babies' bottles. Food Standards Australia New Zealand, however, is blithe, saying "no one is eating unsafe levels".

What is safe? We don't know. Longitudinal studies don't exist. We do know that these chemicals mimic estrogen in mice, that estrogens accumulate and that excessive estrogen in boys causes gynecomastia (man boobs), premature growth spurts, lack of muscle and facial hair, decreased adult height and quite probably (though this is poorly understood) sub-fertility. We also know that these characteristics are increasing - in the West.

This makes it a brave experiment we're engaged in - turning our boys into girls while, elsewhere, they turn to AK-47s.

You could see this as offering the other cheek. Or you could see it as what goes around, comes around.

The lies we are told about rape . . .

Sadly, people will wallow in this as they have already been convinced that "RAPE" is out of control. My friend (Amfortas) and I did some major investigating into the "RAPE" phenomena via the Australian Bureau Of Statistics last year and found it to be a total lie..

Podcasts here..  or have a look under the main heading for the link named MP3 Podcasts..

Take a pick as there are plenty there. Even your's truly sprucked on a few..

We basically found that a survey called the "Women's Safety Survey" was so biased and factually incorrect that we produced three MP3's just to cover those blatant, obvious lies and misinformation. When comparing those lies and false statistics to a later survey by the ABS ( Personal Safety Survey), we can finally see, without bias or feminist manipulation that women are actually a lot safer than men are..

But you will not hear about that because the "victimhood" mentality that feminist have introduced for so long is way too prevalent..

Just have a think about their claim for a minute. In a University of 10,000 (not uncommon) students, that would mean that 1,500 women will be raped according to the feminist lies. Assumption being that there are more female than male students present. Now, how many rapes have you seen or heard of ?
Most cases are fraudulent, most cases are raised because she was either too pissed or stoned out of her head to even remember. I don't by the way condone or suggest that rape is anything minor or that the perp. should not be held accountable, (preferably on both sides) but because feminists have included some rather questionable reason that they claim to be rape, it is just totally incomprehensible and unworkable.

The lies we are told about rape . . .

By False Rape Society | Mon, Sep 27 2010, 04:55 PM
Link..
The following is an article published this month by Caroline May:

College campus rape rate 10 times higher than Detroit’s? Don’t believe everything the Justice Department tells you

As college students poured back into classrooms this week, ABC Nightline breathlessly reported (and other news outlets and blogs echoed): “A recent study from the Department of Justice estimated that 25 percent of college women will be victims of rape or attempted rape before they graduate within a four-year college period.”

The short statement is enough to make parents think twice before sending their daughter to college. Despite the seriousness of the claim, the hook is riddled with inaccuracies and misrepresentations — not least of which is the actual statistic.

Indeed, nearly 50 percent of the “rape victims” referred to in the report said they had not been raped.

The document in question, “Acquaintance Rape of College Students,” by attorney Rana Sampson, is not a study but rather a report combining and relying on several studies — the largest of which remains problematic.

Sampson released her report more than four years ago and though the Justice Department provided her with some funding, she was not a Justice Department employee. “The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice,” the report disclaims.

The one-in-four statistic, according to footnotes, is derived from a study conducted in 2000 called, “The Sexual Victimization of College Women” (SVCW), by Bonnie S. Fisher, Francis T. Cullen and Michael G. Turner.

Dr. Neil Gilbert, a professor of social welfare at University California, Berkeley, told The Daily Caller that the SVCW’s numbers are severely inflated due to the study’s broad definition of rape and the manner in which subjects were questioned.

According to Gilbert, the SVCW study results found a rate of rape that was 10 times higher than when the methodology for the National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) was used. Namely, “the National Crime Victimization study had a check to make sure that the codes [or definitions of rape, force, etc.] of responses reflected the interviewees precise description. The SVCW study did not use this type of control on coding,” Gilbert explained.

In the SVCW study, researchers asked subjects to explain what happened to them and then decided, using their own definitions, what was and was not rape. The study defined rape in exceptionally wide terms: “Forced sexual intercourse including both psychological coercion as well as physical force. Forced sexual intercourse means vaginal, anal or oral penetration by the offender(s). This category also includes incidents where the penetration is from a foreign object such as a bottle. Includes attempted rapes, male as well as female victims, and both heterosexual and homosexual rape. Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”

The inclusion of the phrase “psychological coercion” as part of the definition greatly increased the number of “victims.”

In an interview with TheDC, Sampson made no distinction between violent rape and regret after seduction. “Rape is rape is rape,” she said. “I think that the kind of harm that one experiences during rape is not something we want to belittle.”

Apart from the hair-raising 25 percent figure, the SVCW study reports that when those categorized as rape victims were asked if what they described was rape, nearly 50 percent said “no.” Further, 80 percent of the subjects researchers labeled as rape victims stated that the incident resulted in neither physical or emotional injuries. Only 5 percent of those identified as victims of rape actually reported the incident. “If an attorney defending a rapist were to use this, they’d say ‘Well, what’s the big deal? 80 percent of women who are raped don’t have any adverse affects,’” Gilbert said.

“It expands the definition in a way that it includes a lot of events — you know sexual activity at that age can be confusing, there is regret after, there are break ups, all kinds of things that go on,” Gilbert said.

But, according to Sampson many women do not actually realized they have been raped. “It often doesn’t register as rape to women because it does not look like the image they have in their mind. It turns out that image is not the most common type of rape and that is why so many people are able to get away with it,” she said.

Manhattan Institute fellow Heather Mac Donald put Sampson’s rape report numbers up against Detroit’s, a city with one of the highest violent crime rates of any city in the country. In that city, at the time of the report’s release, the violent crime rate was 2.4 percent, which includes crimes of rape, murder, assault and robbery.

“If 25 percent of all college women were experiencing a violent crime rate that was 10 times higher than anything experienced in the most violent areas, colleges would be transformed. They would be shut down,” Mac Donald told TheDC. “Parents would not be clamoring to get their daughters into Harvard and Yale and Brown and Wesleyan and every other college. You would have a massive revamping of admissions processes because what this statistic says is that colleges are letting in tens of thousands of violent criminals.”

While reports such as Nightline’s scream about an epidemic, Mac Donald says college rape hotlines are silent. “I mean they are so desperate to find rape that at Yale, for instance, they have thrown out the rule that the accuser has the right to confront his victim, which is a cornerstone of our Anglo-Saxon common law heritage. This is at Yale.”

Gilbert said that the desire to inflate the numbers comes down to funding. “These studies have been used to get funding for women’s centers on college campuses,” Gilbert said. “I call it advocacy research, these people mean well and have legitimate concerns. But at some point they exaggerate so much that it is no longer a problem but the norm and with studies like this they risk doing just that.”

Family Court: The Excuse For Injustice..

Time to get back to reality and expose the "Family Law Courts" for what it really is. A billion dollar business which can only be regarded as a feeding frenzy for  lawyers as it's purpose has demonstrated to be irrelevant as far as the "best interest of the child" is concerned. Feminists introduced that metaphor for the purpose of introducing their male-hate agenda. Meanwhile the divorce and litigation lawyers are growing rich of the backs of those who can least afford it.

Maybe some day, justice may actually be applied in that arena but not until it is completely dismantled and re-written but what are the odds when there are so many jobs involved and so many well heeled lawyers not willing to see their cash cow, nurtured..

It use to be the "snout in the trough" but that has been elevated to "sucking the golden teet"..

UK: Childhood casualties of the family courts

By Men's Activism News | Mon, Sep 27 2010, 10:52 AM
Link..
Article here. Excerpt:

'Fathers still have the odds stacked against them when it comes to custody battles in the family court system, but are warring parents forgetting what and who they are fighting for?
...
When Paul returned home from a six-month tour of duty in Afghanistan, he found his key no longer fitted his front door.

"My wife had changed the locks on the house I was paying the mortgage on, and my kids were inside with her new bloke," he said. "I can't tell you what I felt, trying to make sense of it all. It was a bad dream. She had a lawyer lined up to talk about money and they seemed stunned when I said I wanted contact.

"I had kids because I wanted to be a dad. I am a dad, not a sperm donor."

His little boys were then aged three and 18 months. He hasn't seen them for almost two years and struggles on with his legal battle.'

Canada: "It’s time to blow up Divorce Court"

By Men's Activism News | Mon, Sep 27 2010, 10:54 AM
Link..
Article here. Excerpt:

'Ontario Chief Justice Warren recently recommended “dramatic” changes to the family law justice system that would deny litigants access to the courts if they didn’t go through mediation or arbitration first.

“(O)nly in the event that the alternative dispute resolution process is unsuccessful would access to the costly, time-consuming, adversarial and sometimes acrimonious court process be available to litigants” Justice Winkler said earlier this month in a speech marking the opening of Ontario courts for the current session.

Apparently fine-tuning the system is of little value and a new approach, “a fresh conceptual approach,” is required.

But a report on family law by the Law Commission of Ontario questioned the effectiveness of mediation. It’s no big surprise that our family justice system was found to be lacking, indeed the title of the report refers to our “Broken Family Justice System.”

Apparently mediation isn’t a cure for what ails the system. Mediation only works when both sides want it to work. Of course, mediation can be expensive and not all mediators are effective.
...

Instead of more mediation, we need to deal with the high costs of litigation by lowering fees and providing more money to lower-income litigants. Flexible payment plans would also be nice.

So what’s the answer: More mediation, more money or dealing with the high costs of litigation? What if it’s none of the above?

If we recognize that the current system is costly, time-consuming and often acrimonious, why don’t we come to the obvious conclusion? Perhaps we need to blow up the system and build a new, improved system from the ground up. What better place to start than with our cherished adversarial system?'

Um, I dont know what to call this..

As far as I can tell the content of this video is not contagious. I did wonder if hypnotherapy might help or even an anti-distemper shot. Maybe a visit to your Reiki "expert" may help (you know, all that cosmic energy funneling), maybe a trip to Madam Hadashi-Guru with a quick flick of the tarot cards could be beneficial, who knows ?

Anyway, you have been warned..

Disclaimer:

Watching this video may cause double vision, irrational behaviour or in some cases blind rage. We are not accountable for the damage to your screen or mental capacity after viewing.

AFL Grand FInal "A Draw"..

Well there you have it. The one final in the Australian Football or Aussie Rules game and it ends in a draw between St Klida And Collingwood. Excellent game where the lead changed several times but they will all be back next week to do it all again..

This game is huge in Australia with 100,000 people packing the stadium..

Collingwood Football Club

St Kilda Football Club..

Date Rape Cannot Apply if you're Pissed..

Feminist have been lying about rape on campus for years. Studies have clearly stated that the event is minor but it does not stop them from claiming that it is of "plague" proportions. Who was that female a few months ago fraudulently claiming dollars and admitting to lying about the plague proportions of imaginary rape.

Sadly, it's women themselves promoting and encouraging the lies as they are very prepared to believe anything that places them into the "victim" position..

This woman could have made a false rape claim and that is what it would have been, on her word, without question where the campus gestapo are concerned (guilty until proven innocent (Duke Boys)). She has to take responsibilty for her own actions as much as they usually refuse to..

Friday, September 24, 2010

Rape Culture 101 -- Haunting, maybe, but was it rape?

by Connie Chastain*

Earlier this month, Salon.com ran a "human interest" story in its "Life Stories" section titled "Haunted by the Morning After." A first-person narrative by Elizabeth Kennedy (which is a pseudonym), the piece tells the story of a high school party at which Ms. Kennedy may or may not have been raped. She doesn't really know for sure; she was too drunk to remember.

What happened, in a nutshell, is that Ms.Kennedy went to a party with friends, drank too much and hit on a guy. They traipsed into the woods together and made out. After sending the boy mixed messages about having sex, she passed out. When she awakened to the sound of her friends calling her, she was half undressed and the boy, naked, was passed out beside her.

She couldn't remember what happened, but it must've been bad because she was a basket case the next day, a state that lasted on into her freshman year of college. She saw a therapist for her depression; the therapist concluded that she had been raped. There was some comfort in the diagnosis, but Ms. Kennedy wasn't sure that was truly what happened. In any case, through her early twenties she engaged in boozy, highly unsatisfying hookups until at age 26 she'd had enough and quit drinking.

On the surface, Ms. Kennedy's experience is a cautionary tale with an uplifting ending -- wayward girl faces some unpleasant truths and takes responsibility for herself, her actions, her life. But that's only part of the story.

I was fascinated and appalled when I first read it. Part of it is generational, I'm sure. In my high school days, nobody "did it" just for fun. Sometimes girls with long-term steady boyfriends would give in, in a moment of weakness, but they didn't write human interest stories about it, and only their closest confidants knew.

But since those days, feminism and the sexual revolution have worked their evil spells, and "hook ups" are common even in high school. Our whole culture has become sexualized, starting with preschool girls in makeup and sexy costumes strutting on a pageant stage, to sex-ed in the schools, and from there moving into every aspect of the popular culture, particularly movies, television, and now the Internet.

Women, so feminism says, should be in charge of their own sexuality. In the days of second wave feminism, that meant taking control of a woman's sexuality from men, mainly her husband, so that she decided when and if to have sex, permit pregnancy, and have children.

Somehow, now, it has come to mean that women should be able to be as promiscuous as men -- at least, to the extent they believe men are promiscuous -- without harm to their reputation and, significantly, to their chances at marriage, when they're ready.

But evidently there is enough of a stigma left, in some circles (Ms. Kennedy is from a Catholic family and attended Catholic schools) that women can feel morning-after regret. Sometimes this regret morphs into accusations of rape. By now, readers of this blog are familiar with how and why that happens.

In Ms. Kennedy's case, it didn't end in a rape accusation, but it easily could have.

One thing that stands out about her tale is that it is liberally sprinkled with her attempts to give herself the benefit of the doubt -- to present her inexperience and naiveté, which are evidently supposed to absolve her of responsibility for her part in her predicament.

In fact, she begins the piece with a bid for sympathy, putting forth the possibility that she'd been raped in the very first sentence and describing her bouts of suicidal depression that presumably resulted from it. Excuses and pre-emptive explanations continue throughout her narrative -- she got so drunk the night of the party because she was "selectively bulimic in those days" (bulimia being a female malady) and drank on an empty stomach at the party. She gives some backstory about never having had "the talk" with her mother, about her fascination with her friends' tales of their sexcapades.

The self-absolvement continues in her recounting of the encounter with "Tony," who may or may not have raped her.

I must admit I was surprised at the comments following the story at Salon. Some took a practical, level-headed view of her predicament, declared it was not rape, and put the responsibility for her problem squarely where it lay. Nevertheless, there were many poor-little-thing sentiments that raveled my patience.

Whatever she was trying to accomplish by writing the story and having it published, here's the bottom line for me: She got herself drunk. She initially hit on the guy. She asked him for sex once. She answered in the affirmative when he asked her if she still wanted to.

Read that one again. He. Asked. Her. And. She. Said. Yes. That is consent. Consensual sex is not rape.

It is a rather depressing story, and I have to wonder how many other young women in our permissive society have similarly ruined their lives. About the only good thing to come out of this one, to me, is that she didn't report the boy to the police and get him thrown in prison for thirty years.

*Connie is a member of the FRS team whose column appears here every Friday. Her blog is http://conniechastain.blogspot.com/

Dating Site Miss-steps: "I am An Independent Woman".

I have posted previously on the subject of women on dating sites stating they are an "Independent Women",now I would imagine that that comment would appear to be rather superfluous as being on a dating site automatically rules that comment as null and void..

But it does not deter them from throwing that statement endlessly. So when I came across a forum where that topic was introduced I thought I would post those comments here for your perusal..

I recently signed up to one of these online dating sites. I would say that in the majority of the profiles the women declare themselves to be "independent". I'm trying to figure out what the hell that really means. It seems to me to be nothing more than a buzzword in the dating scene. Some of them even say something like, "I'm looking for a man who's independent." I don't think they even have a meaning behind it. It's just part of pop-culture now to be "independent"; whatever the hell that means to you.

Honestly, when they use this phrase it's kind of a turn off. Not that I want someone who is submissive but, I find authenticity to be one of the most attractive traits. When they say, "I'm independent," they sound just like all the other women on the site. There is nothing unique about them. They just seem like another product of the feminist propaganda machine. Why struggle to be seen as "independent" or anything else, when you can just be yourself? That doesn't mean you need to be dependent on someone. Stop saying you're independent and just be that. When they say it, it just sounds like a bunch of bullshit.

I have to ask, "Am I independent?" I have no clue. I've worked hard to get an education, get a good job, and live on my own. I never thought of myself as "independent" though. It just seemed like that's what I should be doing with my life and how I wanted to go about it. The idea behind my efforts were not to be come independent, but to achieve what I want in life.

Yes, precisely. Why claim to be independent when one can just be themselves instead of wallowing in feminist mantra which would automatically lower your potential as a possible match. Obviously it's inclusion is missed by the desperate females trying to find their "soul mate" as it just basically indicates the following..

Whats does it mean? I'll tell you. It's a slap in the face. When an woman claims she's "independent" it means she, "doesn't need a man". And that means you and everyone else with an XY chromosome. It means she can do just fine on her own. She doesn't need your money or your protection. She doesn't need your advice. She doesn't need your shoulder to cry on or your arms to embrace her. She doesn't need your intellect and desire to improve yourself and the world around you. She doesn't need your masculine values or your proactive stance on life. She doesn't need anything you support or stand for. She is telling you that you don't matter to her and that you are completely insignificant to her in every way as a human being. And most importantly she is telling you that she knows you are evil, because you were born male, and she wants no part of it. In other words it is one big fuck you that as a man you are supposed to tolerate as a penance for all the wicked things you have done as an oppressor of women. Got it?

The irony..

Recidivate: How to find a...

I posted this on Dec 2006 and wondered if any of these recommendations or guidance steps may have changed with time in comparison to today's demands..

Oh, by the way, I did include the diametrically opposed version purely for reasons of equality, ofcourse..

A guide on finding a Girlfriend...........

A female's advice for men on finding a girlfriend.....

If you're looking for one special girl, consider following these tips to get a girlfriend.

Instructions

STEP 1: Know what type of girl you're looking for. Make a list of traits that appeal to you, such as intelligence, looks, ambition, sense of humor, or respect for other people's feelings.

STEP 2: Resolve old hurts and disappointments. Make sure you're ready for a new relationship by setting aside any grievances about old girlfriends.

STEP 3: Attract the type of girl you're looking for by emphasizing your best features and downplaying undesirable traits. Make the most of what you have, both physically and mentally.

STEP 4: Learn how to make a girl feel good about herself by taking an interest in her life and her aspirations.

STEP 5: Consider any unattached girls at your school or work. Do any of them match the qualities that you want in a girlfriend?

STEP 6: Get involved in activities that you enjoy to give yourself the chance to meet new girls. Expand your horizons and your circle of friends.

STEP 7: If you have your eye on a certain girl, let mutual friends know about your interest in her. Ask someone you trust to discreetly tell her about your interest.

STEP 8: If you don't have the nerve to directly approach a girl who has caught your eye, consider being her secret admirer for a while. Send her sweet, anonymous messages or notes (with a few subtle clues about your identity) to let her know about your interest in her.

Tips & Warnings
Love can surface in unexpected places and at unexpected times. Keep your eyes open for the right girl for you.
Don't settle for anybody just so you can say you have a girlfriend. Be selective to find the right girl for you.

Revised for accuracy:
by the dquaidman....

If you're looking for one special girl, consider following these tips to get a girlfriend.

Instructions

STEP 1: Lower your standards. Your “dream girl” no longer exists in any way, shape or form. The kind, supportive, respectful woman you want has gone the way of the dinosaur. Aim low or suffer from severe disappointment when the girl you find turns out to be a conniving, self-righteous, lying, money-grubbing version.

STEP 2: Get a lobotomy in order to forget about the numerous times you’ve been betrayed and/or emotionally abused by one or more former significant others.

STEP 3: Get rid of anything that she might find offensive, including personal opinions, beliefs, hobbies, friends, and personal possessions that have no monetary value (to her at least). Throw away all your favorite, comfortable clothes and dress trendy. Reinvent yourself into an “edgy yet sensitive” type. Forget about all the interesting and valuable knowledge you’ve acquired over the years, since you never want to say anything that makes her feel dumb (however dumb she may actually be).

STEP 4: Learn how to make a girl feel good about herself by learning about fashion, soap operas, celebrities, talk-shows and menopause. Never talk about history, politics, science or other demeaning topics.

STEP 5: Consider any unattached girls at your local Alcoholics Anonymous or red-light district. After a few showers and the obligatory tests for venereal diseases, one of them might just be a keeper, at least until her bad boy ex-lover shows up and starts sleeping on your couch.

STEP 6: Get involved in activities that you hate (such as going to the ballet or shopping for shoes) to give yourself the chance to meet new girls. Expand your horizons and your circle of friends to include drug addicts, ex-convicts, prostitutes, strippers and homeless people. One of them surely has to know some fine upstanding girl who is looking for a nice guy.

STEP 7: If you have your eye on a certain girl, for god’s sake don’t talk nice to her. She’ll only think you want in her pants. Instead, treat her like she’s worthless or simply ignore her. She’ll be making you pancakes in no time.

STEP 8: Get rich.

Tips & Warnings
Love can surface in unexpected places and at unexpected times. Always carry a condom and a fake ID.

Settle for anybody that comes along. All women are beautiful, at least on the inside.

Google Search: Feminism, Boring..

Here is a good example on how many people "worldwide" are interested in Feminism and Feminists..

Note the search on feminist critics completely wipes out any interest in the above. Feminism is not only lacking interest but here it is demonstrated that the anti-feminist attitude prevails..

Female Desperation: Project Husband..

The desperation is surfacing as the clock ticks and gravity takes hold. Rather sad actually, as more and more women fail to comprehend that while those "rape the Hubby" laws exist, fewer males are willing to be raped of his finance, children and endure future psychological battering..

But, here she is having booked in a wedding for next year. Grab your tux and your credit card and off you go..

Any takers ?



Next article..

Project Divorce..

UPDATE..

Just like you would choose a clothing item or a dish on the menu. Here we have Cinderella with co-conspirator lining up the next sucker..



Thanks to Will S..

Boys Playing With Girls, Sport ofcourse..

Just another example of the disastrous affect of Title IX that feminists introduced to ensure that Men's Sports is reduced and women's sports elevated even though they do not play as much sport as the men do..

So now it would appear that the boys have to join the girl's team just to keep it functioning but ofcourse we have the ongoing whining from women coaches, decrying it..

Another case of  "making your bed and now having to sleep in it..

Poetic justice..

A group of boys at a high school in Greensburg are carrying sticks these days, running around on a "pitch" and actually wearing skirts in public. That's what field hockey players do.

Introducing Dom Antonucci, Ryan McHugh, Eric Lewis, Tyler Hillman and Ben Kerestan -- all members of the Greensburg Central Catholic girls' field hockey team.

And you thought "Five Guys" was just a restaurant name?

It is not unheard of to see a boy playing field hockey in the WPIAL. It has happened numerous times over the past few decades at different schools. But five on one team? That is unheard of in the WPIAL, and is not being met with open arms around girls' field hockey circles.

Greensburg Central Catholic coach Molly Reese said the boys are playing because the team didn't have enough girls players. The squad has 16 players (11 play at a time).

But McHugh said he came out to keep in shape for boys' lacrosse season in the spring. Antonucci said he is playing "just to do it. It's just something you don't see, five guys on one team. Maybe it will be more guys interested in playing."

Greensburg Central Catholic is 3-0 this season after defeating Vincentian, 2-0, Thursday at Vincentian's pitch (field). The boys are making a major difference. McHugh has seven goals. He and Antonucci dominated play against Vincentian -- essentially because they were bigger, stronger, faster and quicker than anyone else. McHugh is 5 feet 8, 170 pounds, and Antonucci 5-7, 165.

The boys wear the same uniform as the girls -- all the way down to the skirts.

"I'll be honest, I don't think it's fair at all to have that many boys playing at one time," said Vincentian coach Lauren Dorsch. "Aside from fairness, I don't think it's safe. I have three girls out right now with concussions [before the Greensburg C.C. game]. Head injuries are prevalent in field hockey and I just don't think boys at this age should be playing against the girls."

This is the first season the "Five Guys" have played field hockey at Greensburg Central Catholic, although Antonucci did play two years ago for Greensburg Salem. Dorsch believes Greensburg Central is now one of the top contenders to win a WPIAL championship -- because of the boys.

Lewis plays goalie for Greensburg Central. Three of the other boys were always on the field against Vincentian. A few girls saw little playing time.

"Our girls didn't think it was fair, either," Dorsch said. "These aren't wimpy boys. They're strong boys. I mean, where do you draw the line? Is this a coed sport now? Are you going to be allowed to have 10 boys and one girl playing?"

Contrary to popular belief, there are no rules in Pennsylvania high school athletics to prevent gender crossing in sports, ever since a 1975 Commonwealth Court issued a permanent injunction directing the PIAA to permit girls to practice and play interscholastic sports with boys.

But it also works the opposite way. Boys can play any girls sport. For example, a boy could play girls' basketball, even if the school has a boys' basketball team.

Individual school districts, however, can come up with their own rules concerning gender crossing in sports, and a few have in eastern Pennsylvania. Four years ago, the WPIAL urged school districts to come up with their own rules.

"We asked districts to consider adopting a policy, so that these types of situations [like Greensburg Central Catholic field hockey] do not occur," said WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley. "But that's a philosophy the school district needs to develop, based on what their solicitor advises them to do."

Reese said her girls' players have totally accepted the five boys and she defends the idea of boys playing on the team.

"We've played against boys before when we've had an all-girls team, and we've won," said Reese, in her fourth season. "We're playing by the same rules as everyone else."

McHugh and Antonucci also play hockey and lacrosse.

"On our hockey team, girls are welcome to play, and our lacrosse team had a girl a few years ago," McHugh said. "Girls can play guys' sports, and our school doesn't have a men's field hockey team, so ... We're not doing it as a joke. If we were joking, we wouldn't go to practice five days a week for two hours a day."

Antonucci said, "I understand that this used to be a girls' sport. But over in India, it's a guys' sport. Pretty much in every other country, guys play. So why can't we play over here?"

Women's 2009 Driving Awards..

Number 10

Number 9

Number 8

Number 7

Number 6

Number 5

Number 4

Bronze

Silver

Gold

Mosque at Ground Zero: Problem Solved..

Here is the problem of a mosque near the ground zero site with options, solved..

I am truly perplexed that so many of my friends are against a mosque being built near Ground Zero.

I think it should be the goal of every American to be tolerant.

The mosque should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance.

That is why I also propose, that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque

thereby promoting tolerance within the mosque.

We could call one of the clubs (which would be gay) "The Turban Cowboy"

and the other being a topless bar "You Mecca Me Hot".

Next door should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork and

adjacent to that have an open barbeque pork rib restaurant,

called something like “Iraq o’ Ribs”?

Across the street there could be a very daring lingerie store called

Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret with sexy mannequins in the window modeling the goods.

Next door to the lingerie shop, there would be room for an Adult Toy Shop (Koranal Knowledge),

its name in flashing neon lights, and on the other side a liquor store, maybe call it" Morehammered"?

Then the Muslims could be allowed to show their tolerance. Problem solved.

GA

Femisogynists Demand That Women Must Win All Marathons..

Femisogynists have introduced methods that would demand this type of behaviour in Women. Firstly, they assassinated, garroted and finally buried chivalry as they determined (and women in general) it to be cancer against women. How dare men show respect towards women (the bastards).Funnily enough, now they want it back. Then in their efforts to be "equal", murdered Men's sporting activities in all colleges and Universities, introducing positive discrimination even though a lot fewer women play sport than Men do. Then they introduced blatant bias into marathons and other sporting events allowing women to start a half an hour before Men in order to be first across the line and be claimed the winner (Boston, New York Marathons, on this blog)
And they are still at it..

Some races take steps to ensure that a female crosses the finish line first—whether she has the fastest time or not.

And this..

After Mr. Mederos won last year's Disney race debut, organizers decided that this year, only women would be allowed in the first corral of runners, giving them an advantage of several minutes over men. Though a 41-year-old Canadian male posted the fastest time, a 33-year-old North Dakota woman crossed the finish line first.

The princess must win at all costs..
No wonder the loathing is deep seated and festering..

On top of all that, the femisogynists demanded that all sport events have to be gender exclusive and women should be able to join which ever team they want and play any sport and compete with the Men regardless of her size, ability or experience. So how has that worked out ?

It must be downright embarrassing for those women who have been raised into the feminists demands that they can do anything a man can just to be thrashed and humiliated when applied to real life..

But on they dream, they assume that they are able but even the most determined, fit and capable female at the age of 22 years is only equivalent "aerobically" to a 50 years old male (given similar training). That they forgot to tell them, oops..

Interlopers Run Amok: Guys Crash Road Races for Women

By KEVIN HELLIKER
Link..
Jonathan Mederos set a personal record in Disney's Princess Half Marathon last year, winning first place with a time of 1:16:17.

The reception he got was far from his personal best, though. "When I crossed the finish line, the announcers were silent, and I got downcast looks from the crowd," says Mr. Mederos, a 25-year-old high-school philosophy teacher in Miami.

That's what a guy gets for winning a women's race. As Rick Cordes took last year's Nike Women's Half Marathon, he slunk across the finish line, with a finger pressed to his lips, beseeching silence after having been heckled throughout the race.
ASI Photo

Jonathan Mederos

"Maybe I shouldn't have been so competitive in a race that I would have been slaughtered in if it were an all-men's field," says Mr. Cordes, a 48-year-old California real-estate broker, in an email. He was one of nearly 700 men among more than 12,700 women in the Nike Half Marathon.

This year, at least a dozen races styled for women are having their debuts across America, from the Nashville Women's Half Marathon on Sept. 25, to Long Island's Divas Half Marathon a week later.

The growth results from an explosion in the number of female runners, who last year accounted for 53% of all U.S. road-race finishers, according to the research center Running USA.

"You take out the testosterone and these events are kinder, cleaner, gentler and sweeter," says Robert Pozo, who runs a group of women's races from a website called Run Like a Diva.

Men can register for these races, as footnotes on the event websites note. Technically allowing guys to run avoids legal spats, pleases charity sponsors whose fund-raisers are often male and engenders a magnanimous spirit. But these races tolerate rather than welcome male participants.

The growing acceptance of men at women's races represents a sort of reverse Title IX, the federal law that opened the doors for women to compete in many sports. But men aren't exactly jumping at the chance, even at women's races that actively encourage male participation, such as the Nike Women's Half Marathon. Brook Gardner, an Oregon sports journalist, went to San Francisco last year to cover the race, and at the urging of Nike officials agreed to run it. As it turned out, he heard constant cries of "go, girl" and at the finish line received a tiffany necklace from a man wearing a tuxedo. "I felt a little awkward," says Mr. Gardner.
[CRASHERS] ASI Photo

Jonathan Mederos races in Disney's Princess Half Marathon—for women.

"We suggest men only do the race in support of a woman or charity," says the website of this week's Nashville Women's Half Marathon. "If he is looking to win a race, get an award or [set a personal record], we would be happy to suggest some other events in the local area that would be better suited for those goals."

To discourage male interest, many women's races present trophies only to female winners. Goodie bags often contain feminine-cut T-shirts, along with swag like perfume samples, chocolates and pink sandals. One race is giving away feather boas and tiaras.

Ahead of its Oct. 2 inaugural half marathon, Run Like a Diva announced that finishers' medals will be awarded by bare-chested male firefighters. "We had four men signed up, but two dropped out when they heard about the firemen," says Mr. Pozo, the race organizer. "We're making this race so girly that men won't want any part of it."

While male participation in the Nike Half Marathon has risen steadily over the years, the number of men running Disney's Princess Half Marathon jumped to 423 this year from 196 in the debut. Men remained vastly outnumbered, with nearly 11,000 women running this year.

Some men run at the behest of girlfriends and wives. Mr. Mederos, unheralded winner of last year's Disney race, says he ran as a "prince" for his girlfriend, not to show up females.

Other men see a target-rich environment. "If you want to meet fit young women, it's hard to beat," says Maj. Christopher Sopko, a 31-year-old pilot in the Ohio Air National Guard.

Although men are loath to admit it, one appeal women's races have for them is the shot at a better finish. Men who ran in the middle of a pack of guys can finish near the top of a field teeming with women.

Mr. Cordes had never won a heavily attended race before taking first place in last year's Nike Women's Half Marathon. (He ran it, he says, because his wife, coach of a Nike running club, encouraged him.)

Although the Disney race's website says the half marathon is officially designed "for a princess earning her glass running slippers or a woman who runs her kingdom already," Rick Gausche found this year's event a fine ego-booster. The 29-year-old process-design consultant ranked fourth among men and eighth overall. "I've never passed so many women in my life," he says.

Some races take steps to ensure that a female crosses the finish line first—whether she has the fastest time or not.

After Mr. Mederos won last year's Disney race debut, organizers decided that this year, only women would be allowed in the first corral of runners, giving them an advantage of several minutes over men. Though a 41-year-old Canadian male posted the fastest time, a 33-year-old North Dakota woman crossed the finish line first.

Not that all women need a head start. At last November's St. Petersburg Women's Half Marathon in Florida, a 23-year-old medical student named Clayton Hofstra stood at the start recalling what a junior-high-school cross-country coach had told him: "Never let a girl beat you."

But standing nearby was Christa Benton, an older graduate of his high school who had dominated long-distance running. Sure enough, Ms. Benton finished first, followed by three other women.

Still proud of finishing 13th overall and fifth among the 138 men, Mr. Hofstra tried wearing his pink T-shirt to class the next day, only to find it was too tight. "I guess I hadn't realized that the shirts came in women's sizes," he says.

Feminists: The New Femisogynists..

I thought I would post this for two reasons..

1. I learned a new word.
2. Feminists hate women almost as much as they hate men..

Femisogynist: The hate feminists project at any women who does not agree with their unexplainable hate process ( my interpretation by the way)

Oh yes, and you thought it was only me !!..

Feminazis Open Fire on Taylor Swift

from The Greenroom by Cassy Fiano

There is no limit to the amount of control that feminazis want to have over our lives. If women do not adhere to the unbelievably strict rules set down for us by the fascist feminist Left, then they are labeled anti-feminist and anti-woman. The latest example of the femisogynist litmus test is Taylor Swift, denounced as unfeminist… for writing about true love and having a wholesome image. The nerve!
Taylor Swift isn’t even 21 yet, and she’s already a force to be reckoned with. She became a superstar in 2006 at the age of sixteen, and today she’s sold over 10 million albums and appeared in several major motion pictures. She’s written her own music and said that most of her songs are autobiographical. She not only sings, but she also plays guitar and has produced much of her own music. Does any of this matter? Nope! Her latest song, Mine, has the femisogynists up in arms.

This song is rife with freaky-deaky, weirdo language that frames Swift as someone perpetually under the ownership, or at least care, of a male authority. The lyrics describe her as not a woman, but as a “careless man’s careful daughter” that her new boyfriend has “made a rebel of.” This is problematic to me, in the sense that it implies a transfer of her ownership from one man to another. I think it’s weird in this song that she doesn’t seem to have any sense of her own identity away from the love interest, or her father. I do, however, give her props for the use of the line “we got bills to pay.” Though grammatically incorrect, it implies that Taylor will be helping to pay the bills though some means of gainful employment. Let’s go back in time 50 years so that I can congratulate her on being progressive!
The other thing I found noteworthy was how Taylor was dealing with the transition from teen star to general entertainer. As much as she infantilizes herself, Swift is distinctly more adult here as compared to her previous videos. She’s got bills to pay! She has children! Usually when you see “teen” stars (she’s 20) make the transition from adolescence, they do it via the sexy route, à la Britney, LiLo, and Miley. This video is unique in the sense that Taylor Swift appears to be trying to age herself into a more matronly, albeit still conventionally attractive, role. It’s not often that we are encouraged to make an association between young pop starlets and motherhood….

Aside from completely misconstruing the lyrics, why does it matter what Taylor Swift writes about? Here is a self-made woman, someone who has built a career for herself, and done it in a classy, age-appropriate manner. For most rational, normal people, Taylor Swift is considered a role model. But it’s not good enough for the feminazis. Heaven forbid someone writes songs about their own feelings without consulting the fascist feminists about whether or not it’s considered Feminist Approved.
Feministing also jumped on the anti-Taylor Swift bandwagon, because Taylor Swift — a woman — is somehow “sexist.” And the reason that she is sexist is because a few femisogynists decided that the message of her music is somehow bad. Traditional love and romance is considered the most sexist thing ever when it comes to these enlightened beings. (After all, why should a woman be in a traditional, loving, respectful relationship?) When you consider that, as stated before, most of Swift’s songs are autobiographical, as in, based on her own experiences in relationships, it’s even more ridiculous. The feminazis claim that the issue is that music should speak to people, but obviously her music does speak to people, or she wouldn’t be selling millions and millions of albums. The issue here isn’t that women and girls don’t empathize with Taylor Swift’s lyrics, it’s that the feminazis want to decide what kind of relationships are sexist and not sexist.
The issue here is not about Taylor Swift. It’s about the monster that these feminazis have turned feminism into. Equality has gone completely out the window. It’s just like how pro-abortion advocates call themselves “pro-choice”. It isn’t about women deciding what choices to make for themselves. Taylor Swift, for example, is a successful, independent, wealthy woman who has accomplished so much at an incredibly young age. But because certain women who have hijacked the term feminist don’t like what she sings about, she’s automatically labeled as sexist and anti-feminist. Wouldn’t equality mean that a woman could choose to write whatever kind of music she wanted to write about… and that women could choose to listen to whatever kind of music they like? Feminism is not about a litmus test for how a woman lives her life, and it isn’t a list of rules. Feminism is about equality… something that the women who claim to be fighting for women’s right threw out the window a long tim

Kevin Rudd: MORE Money for WOMEN only..

Rudd announces Australian pledge of $225m foreign aid for women, children

Don't be fooled about the "children" addition as they will see as much of that as I will. The funding is just another example of Labor's feminist hegemony, "women only" interests. Claiming they are helping children if they do it will definitely exclude boys as well..

The blatant and obvious sexism Labor pursues is without doubt so blatantly obvious at chasing the vagina vote and as usual they will usually vote them back in for that reason. Purely selfish reasons..

Link to feminist whimp article..

KEVIN Rudd has announced that Australia will boost aid for maternal and child health programs in poor nations with an additional $225 million.


The new Foreign Minister said the bulk of the funding would go to African nations, with $140 million in new funding earmarked for Ethiopia, Tanzania and southern Sudan.
And $85 million in aid announced last month will be provided for Australia's nearest neighbours, Papua New Guinea and island states in the Pacific, where Mr Rudd said problems remained "huge".
Speaking in New York, Mr Rudd committed the funding as part of a $US40 billion aid package agreed at the United Nations to potentially save the lives of 16 million children.
He addressed a conference at UN headquarters after discussions held on Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's “global strategy for women's and children's health”.

Scientists invent first male contraceptive pill..

Now, this cannot be good news for the opposite sex. Their reliance on "controlling" their own body (which basically means that she can decide to get pregnant whenever she feels like it) appears to be under a threat. In future, the privileged princess may have to reconsider her false claim that it's "your child" only to be informed there is not a chance in hell it's mine as I am on the pill. That scenario is going to be played through a few thousand times before it will sink in..

So it would appear that in the near future, men will have control over his own spawning and how will this affect that outcome, well the mind boggles..

It will be the case where she says "I want to spawn" and he will say "I ain't spawning", that outcome should shed a little more light on the feminist's version of her deciding when it's suitable and we may as well include those 40+ females desperate to hitch up with any male in order to spawn as well as ensuring future income..

It is going to be interesting..
Link..

Scientists invent first male contraceptive pill
Scientists have developed the worlds male alternative to the female contraceptive pill.

Until now all attempts to develop a male pill have failed with scientists working on a contraceptive jab for men given by doctors.

But researchers in Israel have finally been able to create a oral pill that deactivates sperm before they reach the womb.

And they've developed a version that means it only needs to be to be taken once every three months.

The breakthrough pill could be available in as little as three years, according to the scientist behind the discovery.

Unlike the jab form of the male pill it doesnt use a combination of the male hormone testosterone and the female hormone progesterone to block pregnancy.

The scientist behind the male pill discovery has developed a tablet that removes a vital protein in sperm that is required for a woman to conceive.

So while sperm still get through to the uterus they are unable to fertilise an egg.

Using this approach, researchers believe they have a pill that is 100 pc effective at stopping pregnancy.

Not only is it long lasting but it also has other pluses. There are no side effects as suffered by women who take the contraceptive pill.

Men on the male equivalent hormone jabs, which are still undergoing trials report feelings of moodiness, depression and loss of sex drive.

Professor of Haim Breitbart of Israel's Bar-Ilan University, who has helped develop the pill said: Men dont cope well with side effects and having side effects would probably put many off wanting to take a pill. Weve had none of those problems with our pill.

What we found is that by treating the mice with our molecule we can get sterility for a long period of time -in the lower dose, about one month, and in the higher dose we found three months of sterility.

The mice behaved nicely, They ate and had sex. All I can say is that we couldn't see any behavioural side-effects - all their sex behaviour was retained, which is a very important consideration for men. Human trials of the pill are due to start next year.

A big drawback against men being in control of fertility is the fear they would forget to take a pill.

Polls have repeatedly shown wives and partners do not trust their men to remember to pop a pill every day.

But now that problem has been solved. The new pill can be taken either once a month or once every three months.

Professor Breitbart said: "I think most women would trust their man to remember once a month or once a quarter.

Breitbarts pill jams the sperm's chemical machinery that allows it to create a pregnancy. So while the sperm reaches the womb it dies away unable to fertilise the egg.

He said: We looked at a number of compounds that have no effect on male sex drive, but succeed in impairing the reproductive ability of the sperm.

Because there are no hormonal side effect we believe that it will be fairly easy to get approval for this pill.

Professor Breitbat stunned the world of fertility science four years ago by revealing the commonly held belief that conception was immediate once sperm entered the womb.

The research showed that sperm could surive for up to three days before fertilisation took place.

Professor Breitbart said: I then decided to turn my interest to see how to stop that process. I wanted to develop a form of male contraception that would be free of an intervention using hormpones.

Divorce Insurance with Probabilty Calculator..

Now here is something that may be quite a hit if it wasn't quite so ironic..

You can insure your dog, your tree and even your legs if they are worth it, but this ?

Insure Your Marriage
Against Divorce

Now we already know that insurance companies operate on the percentage principal and are obviously considering this to be a winner but who for ?

They have done the research..

Maybe we should read this first..

Women's relationships today follow
a very predictable pattern:

Link to Women's Infidelity

They push men for commitment
They get what they want
They lose interest in sex
They become attracted to someone else
They start cheating
They become angry and resentful
They begin telling their partners that they need time apart

They blame their partners for their behavior...and eventually, after making themselves and everyone around them miserable for an indefinite, but usually, long period of time, they end their relationships or marriages.

So, good luck. Don't forget to keep up the premiums..

So what Hasn't Feminism Destroyed ?..

I have on a few occasions read articles that pointed out the damage feminists have perpetrated on this Planet, that is, The Planet itself..

Bear with me..

The rise of Feminism introduced a rise in divorces, abortion and single moms. These actions alone insured an increase in accommodation requirements (houses,units,apartments)therefore more structures had to be built. More cars had to be manufactured as one vehicle was now not enough as the parties split and separated. More furniture had to be manufactured, more power produced, more roads built, more shopping centers and it's a never ending list..

I am sure you can come up with quite a few of your own. But, here is another side affect that the male haters ensured..

Has feminism killed the art of home cooking?

Yes, it’s feminism we have to thank for the spread of fast-food chains and an epidemic of childhood obesity.

I really enjoy it when feminists are held accountable for the destruction they have heaped onto society..
Quite a few are jumping onto the MRA bandwagon as outcomes are recognised and studied.

Feminists demanded that boys should be treated like girls. End result ?..

Participation in sports has been dropping since the mid-Nineties, especially among boys — although this has not been helped by the great sell-off of school playing fields.

And ofcourse there is more..

Yet, though many say they aspire to cook, the consumption of convenience food continues to rise — there was a 300 per cent increase between 1997 and 2008, according to a government report.

SO, more fast food outlets had to be built as well to cater for the "supermom" who was not being that at all, preferred obesity for the kids rather than wasting her "executive" hours cooking useless, time wasting food.

Feminists forced women into the work force which in turn increased prices sharply ofcourse, how much does a house cost now ?

And with 70 per cent of women in employment, it cannot please the architects of the gender revolution that we remain the main carers for children.

Anyway, for some more along the same line with some feminist drivel thrown in, here is the link..

Exposing Australian Feminists: Carly Hennessy, Courier Mail, Q'Land..

More grist for the mill, the feminist grist that is..

I came across this site and wanted to include it in my "exposing feminist supporters". So here we have some more..

Fears that teen girls pressured to look like porn stars

• Carly Hennessy, Sam Healy and Daryl Passmore

Now on the face of it, this would be an interesting article were it not for the fact that it references and quotes a feminist by the name of Ms Tankard-Reist Link..
A feminist ofcourse, another follower of the male-hating doctrine wallowing in obscurity if you judge the one single comment that article received. Well, two now, as I could not resist making one..

More of the article..

GIRLS as young as 14 are getting Brazilian waxes, a trend experts have labelled ''pornification'' of teenagers.
Intimate beauty treatments are becoming popular with girls as boyfriends demand they look like porn stars, the experts say.
Leading child protection advocate Hetty Johnston said the trend was ''scary'' and called for legislation to stop it.

While you must be 18 to get a tattoo in Queensland, as well as some types of intimate body piercings, there is no age limit on waxing, although many salons require parental permission for under-16s.
With the formal season about to start and Schoolies just around the corner, beauticians are seeing an increase in girls grooming for the big events.
Author Melinda Tankard-Reist said the ''pornification'' of youth culture was having a diabolical effect on young girls' body image.

Link to article..

 Note ofcourse the standard response feminists are known for. Do not blame the female for her stupidity, blame the guys. They force them to have a "Brazil cut" while towering over them and guiding the razor oir melting the wax just a little too hot..

The journalists listed are also questionable..

Carly Hennessy: Feminist Link..

Sam(antha) Healy:  Cannot determine..

Daryl Passmore: Cannot determine..


Ms Tankard-Reist: Feminist Link..